Editorial – What to do about Reform UK?
Reform UK is a reincarnation of the Brexit Party and given the recent furore over Rupert Lowe MP, seems to be beset by the same type of periodic infighting among its representatives. In fact, it is effectively the same party with a change of name and led and financed by the same people — typically dissident members of the capitalist class who want less regulation of their financial activities. They realise that they can’t get this unless they control political power — the power to make laws and regulations — and that the route to such control lies through the ballot box. They are hoping to repeat their success in the Brexit referendum, by again appealing to anti-foreigner prejudice and distrust of a ‘liberal elite’ that they say is running the country. But they are no friends of the workers whose votes they need.
Reform may have been in the process of trying to develop detailed policies and promises like the other parties, but this is not the basis of its appeal nor why people vote for it. It’s the discontent felt by many about the economic problems they face and the failure of the Labour and Conservative parties to deliver on their promises to mitigate these.
Reform’s position can be described as ‘nativist’ in the sense of supporting a policy of prioritising the interests of native-born inhabitants against those of immigrants. In Britain this would include not just ‘white’ people but native-born and established ‘non-whites’. As Reform members and candidates fall into the latter group, to campaign against the party for being racist won’t wash as it can be seen not to be the case.
Even so, the way Reform expresses its nativism is crude, nasty and divisive. Obviously, socialists counter those spreading hatred against our fellow workers who are refugees or undocumented immigrants. That’s part of our general position that the workers of the world should unite to replace capitalism with socialism.
The pressure group ‘Stand Up To Racism’ proposes to ‘go door to door where Reform candidates are standing to mobilise the vote against them’. But voting for the other parties won’t stem the growth of Reform as the basis for its growth has been precisely the failure of these parties to deliver on their promises.
Reform feeds off the widespread view that the MPs and councillors of the other parties are out for themselves. But that’s not the reason these parties don’t deliver. It’s because they support and operate within capitalism. They fail because under capitalism, a system driven by profit-making, profits have to come before meeting people’s needs; a priority which those making political decisions have to apply. The established parties fail because it is impossible for them to succeed. They would fail even if all their MPs and councillors were saints.
Capitalism simply cannot be made to work for the benefit of the majority class of wage and salary workers and their dependants. Reform will fail too if ever it gets into positions where it is in charge of implementing policies. They too will have to run the system according to its priorities and economic laws.
The way to react to the growth of Reform is not to support the other parties against it. It is to campaign against capitalism and all the parties that support that system and for a society based on the common ownership and democratic control of productive resources so that they can be used to directly meet people’s needs.
One Reply to “Editorial – What to do about Reform UK?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Excellent points. I would add the illusionary ideology of class collaborationist nationalism to list of why workers see classless nativist politics as being realistic. Much of what passes for common sense amongst the ruled class is, in reality, ideas of what constitutes rationality to members of the ruling class. Of course bourgeois think that their wage-slaves should be grateful for the jobs that are given. Praise boss when morning work bells chime. And from that premise, the conservative mantra, “a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work” follows.
Working class citizens see that working class non-citizens are often quite willing to sell their skills for a lower price and who wants to buy at a higher price in the marketplace of commodities when you can get the same thing for a lower price. It all makes for common sense amongst free market conservatives, especially if you’ve been immersed in the Thatcherite ideology that there is no alternative to the wages system for your whole life. And, the rule of the meritorious over those not so well endowed. After all, top down pecking orders are all just part of human nature.