Is Increased Production the Solution?
Under the heading “Britain is Old-fashioned in Industry,” the Evening Standard (October 11th, 1944) reports speeches made at a Conference of the National Council of Women of Great Britain.
“Miss Barbara Ward, assistant editor of The Economist, said Britain must produce more goods and means of production must be more efficient.
Increase in a nation’s wealth depends on the amount of machine power behind each pair of hands.
We have fallen behind in industrial development, she declared. ‘We are old-fashioned.’
Thorough inquiry should be made into each industry—for instance, the steel industry—to discover why our costs were higher than those of other nations.
We should use our utmost enterprise and labour to increase our standards of living, she said.”
Miss Ward has failed to draw the logical conclusion in regard to what would happen if her suggestion were followed. If all nations become more efficient, and competition will force them to do so. then we shall be where we were—before the war.
“Increase in a nation’s wealth depends on the amount of machine power behind each pair of hands,”
Is not this also the cause of a nation’s poverty ? The amount of machine power behind each pair of hands in the United States before the war was greater than in any other country, and so was the amount of relative unemployment and poverty.
The assistant editor of The Economist is apparently unaware of the fact that the aim and object of capitalist production is not the production of wealth, but the production of profit.
Profit is something for nothing.
It is impossible to make something out of nothing, but the capitalist class give nothing and obtain abundant wealth for themselves as a result of playing a flim-flam game.
Labour applied to the natural resources of the earth produces all exchange values. The capitalist class do not labour, therefore they do not produce any wealth. They live by ownership. They own what is essential to the existence of the rest of us.
They allow us to produce exchange values for them in the shape of commodities under certain conditions. Before we are allowed to work we must agree to sell our wealth-producing material, our mental and physical energy, to them at its cost of production—that means, roughly, what we can live and work upon.
When we are working our energy is the property of those who have bought it, and what our energy produces the capitalist claims as his. Wages consist of the food, clothing and shelter the money will buy. The food, clothing and shelter the worker obtains as wages are all produced by those who labour, not by the capitalist class.
Consider the mighty effort of the working class during the war, and what they have lived upon, while doing it.
“Never in the history of human endeavour” has so much been produced on so little.
The working class have brought into being all the airplanes, guns, ships, etc., that were necessary to the carrying on of the war. What is to be their reward? The brutal truth is that capitalism cannot give them anything to compensate them for their efforts. The capitalist class will, however, continue to obtain their surplus values, rent, interest and profit.
The workers, however, expect to be placed in a better position after the war than they ever were before. The interesting point is how are Ihe ruling class going to devise ways and means of continuing the exploiting process. As a result of their experiences on the batlefleld in various parts of the world, many of the wage slaves are beginning to realise that there is something fundamentally wrong in capitalist society.
They will not be easily handled in the piping times of peace and will be harder to deceive.
Bevin says, “There will be unemployment but victory is worth it” (see Star, October 11th). The victory is the victory of the capitalist class, although the fighting, etc., has been done by the working class. If there is nothing for the workers after the war, what have the workers won? The capitalist class still remain in secure possession of the means of life; the land, railways, mines and tools of industry still remain in their possession.
The workers are where they were. Unemployment can be depended upon to keep wages down to that low level that is strictly in accord with capitalist interests, and then the same old grind.
Those who have acquired wealth during the war out of Army contracts, black markets, etc., will return when peace is proclaimed and disport themselves in the charmed circles of society. Many of the workers, however, who have endured the agonies of the struggle and lost their loved ones in the process, will line up at the Labour Exchange or apply for the sweet charity of the Public Assistance Committee. The means test will continue to be applied—to the working class. Homes are to be built—by whom? The landlord class are anticipating pickings when they receive compensation for the property that has been bombed. The financier will come into his own when deflation occurs—some time after the cessation of hostilities. The capitalist will have the wage slaves controlled for him by the Government, assisted by the labour leader. All sections of the ruling class will be compensated—at the expense of the wage slaves.
Everything in the garden will be lovely, as usual, for those who neither toil nor spin.
How long, fellow workers, how long? Can you not see that until the means of life are made common property there is no security for you ? Can you not see that you are doomed to the eternal treadmill of wage slavery and misery so long as the capitalist system shall last? We must do away with production for profit.
We must no longer allow the exploiter to continue to live by obtaining something for nothing. Production for use must be made to take the place of production for sale.
We are the vast majority.
Let us stand together,
All we have to do is to will it.
And the world is ours.
Let us get hold of the State, the public power of coercion, and use it to make the ruling class let go their hold on our bread and life. Those only are Socialists who stand for Socialism; those who stand for less are the allies of our enemies.
The Socialist Party of Great Britain stands exclusively for Socialism; no other party in this country has the courage to do so—at election times.
We propose to run candidates for Parliament on the issue. Socialism or Capitalism—which?
We want you to help us. If you are with us, let us know of your existence. The fight is on.
The useful portion of human society have one common enemy—the exploiting system under which we live. Miss Barbara Ward suggests that by increasing the productive power of the slave-exploiting mechanism the slave would benefit. She fails to perceive that the worker is not paid for what he produces, but for what it costs to produce him. Her remarks enable us to realise, how weak the defenders of capital have become. Against the united advance of those who live by selling their labour power, the capitalist class are absolutely helpless. The interests of the workers are identical on the class field. The class issue is ownership.
The enemies of our class will discuss anything but the real issue. It is never raised in Parliament. It will never be prominent in the capitalist press. The very thought of a revolutionary Socialist Party fills the exploiter with fear and foreboding.
Although we hold the largest meeting in Hyde Park, we are rarely mentioned in the public press.
Has word gone round that attention must not be drawn to our existence? Capitalist politicians read the SOCIALIST STANDARD and listen to our speakers, but all are faithful members of the conspiracy of silence.
The Labour Party is now always referred to as The Socialist Party, although not one of its members stands for Socialism or has been elected on the Socialist ticket.
Why the silence and deception?
The reason is that the ruling class know what we are out for, and they do not want the bulk of the workers to become interested in the issue.
Working class emancipation is, however, on the order of the day.
The freedom of humanity is at stake.
When the wage slaves free themselves from capitalist bondage, they free mankind for ever from economic servitude and the fear of war.
Society can then assume a higher form. There can be no such thing as freedom for the individual so long as some people own that upon which all people depend.
Socialism will give man the opportunity to express the noblest and best that is in him.
In capitalist society the bias is on the wrong side. The worst man has the best chance.
To change capitalist society into a newer and better social order is the job of the common people; it is a working class proposition.
Moving circumstance is slowly but surely removing the web of lies which the henchmen of our masters have been spinning for generations. Take your place, comrade. You should know by now what you are called upon to do. Demand Socialism now. Support only those who do the same.
LESTOR