ZJW
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
ZJWParticipant
Harris vs Trump vs Stein/West:
about the Muslim vote and Arab-American vote in the US:
Harris, Trump, or Neither? Arab & Muslim Voters’ Anger Grows
ZJWParticipantALB –
Here’s a link, that will work, to the h.moss recommended article: https://archive.ph/lRWgPZJWParticipantA critique of that IP review of the David Adam book is here:
- This reply was modified 1 month, 1 week ago by ZJW.
ZJWParticipantIn the same issue (no longer the current one) an article titled ‘Political organisation is key’, which is not worth linking to, ends on this note:
‘Comrade Conrad pointed out that the left in general is in a parlous state. The much vaunted revival of the Young Communist League seems to have come to exactly naught. The Socialist Appeal/RCP success in recruiting young people has been hugely exaggerated. In reality it is a Potemkin village. Internationally too the left is doing badly. For example the Democratic Socialists of America have declined from 100,000 registered members to around half that now. Meanwhile, there has been the complete collapse of the Corbyn project. This has had an adverse effect, but without people learning the lessons.
Instead there is the search by the flotsam and jetsam for the next soft left alliance, broad party, anti-cuts initiative or some other such nonsense. What is needed is commitment to founding a Communist Party.’
ZJWParticipantNuclear energy is a relatively good thing:
https://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1503/natures-gift-to-humanity
(I omit the retort to the above by Jack Conrad titled ‘Nuclear power’s useful idiots’.)
https://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1506/another-useful-innocent
[title ‘Another useful innocent’ bestowed by disapproving editor.]
- This reply was modified 1 month, 4 weeks ago by ZJW.
ZJWParticipantAmusing article about it in the still current WW.
Title: ‘Corbyn’s maybe party —
An eclectic mixture of soft lefts, reformist has-beens, committed localists, inveterate unity-mongers and the plain deluded have been secretly meeting. But, asks Carla Roberts, can we expect anything more than yet another Labour Party mark two?’September 10, 2024 at 2:42 pm in reply to: 1931 Council Communist critique of revolutionary industrial unionism à la IWW #253921ZJWParticipantALB, if you look back at that libcom page now, the CWO’s Dyjbas has answered both your question and mine.
September 9, 2024 at 7:51 am in reply to: 1931 Council Communist critique of revolutionary industrial unionism à la IWW #253918ZJWParticipant@ALB, earlier this morning I put this question (along with another one) to leftdis.wordpress.com, old-fashioned KAPD-style German-Dutch left-communists and champions of the GIC thing. Fredo Corvo by name.
(Later I saw that you posted your question to that libcom page. )
September 9, 2024 at 7:39 am in reply to: 1931 Council Communist critique of revolutionary industrial unionism à la IWW #253917ZJWParticipantThe SPGB as _bloody_ revolutionists. How times have changed. Ha!
‘GEIS observed that the members of The Socialist Party of Great Britain were obsessed with the idea of an armed Revolution ; they could not conceive the possibility of a peaceful revolution, and therefore they insisted on the necessity of the control by the workers of the armed forces of the nation. Their eyes were full of the blood of the French Revolution. Unless the workers were Industrially organised a bloody revolution would undoubtedly occur.’
‘He (Fitzgerald) had every reason to desire a peaceful revolution, but the history of class-antagonisms and the circumstances of modern times provided him with but little hope in that direction.’
ZJWParticipantIn this week’s WW there are two letters (letters number two and three on that page) celebrating the eviction, followed by a comment by Lazare himself (usefully including a link to his site, which I how I saw his unprintable article):https://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1505/letters/
ZJWParticipantQuoting h.moss: ‘A lot of sense in much of what Lazare has to say.’
As Bijou Drains wrote:https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/topic/anti-zionism-is-not-anti-semitic/page/52/#post-250236
- This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by ZJW.
ZJWParticipantFor finding and posting that quote from THE AMERICAN RADICAL PRESS 1880-1960 a round of applause is called for.
ZJWParticipantBut more seriously, come the co-operative commonwealth, how might the Olympics be organised?
ZJWParticipant‘The Distasteful Nonsense of Olympism’:
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20240818-the-distasteful-nonsense-of-olympism
The last paragraph of which being:
‘It’s such instances of political oddities that permit the following suggestion: make all athletes truly amateurish by abolishing their associations with countries. Most nation states, soldered and cemented compacts of hatred, based upon territory often pinched from previous occupants, are such a nuisance in this regard. If Olympism is to make sense, and if the ravings of the physique obsessed de Coubertin are to be given shape, why not get rid of the State altogether, thereby making all participants neutral, if only for a few weeks?’
But what is he proposing? What could be the alternative (in a hypothetical but still capitalist/statist here-and-now) to organising by nation-state?
Well, there’s always Industrial Unionism.
The IWW’s industrial unions are generalised into six ‘departments’, that you can see listed here:https://midvalleyiww.org/member-resources/industrial-unions-and-departments.
Things having changed somewhat since 1905, nowadays one of the departmental divisions (this one, of Public Service) is:
‘Sex Industry Workers Industrial Union 690:
All workers who use sexuality as the primary tool of their industry including telephone and webcam sex workers, actors, erotic massage services, erotic and escort services, and dancers and models in night clubs, exotic dance clubs and peep shows.’
So, at the Olympics there might be a soccer team consisting of male prostitutes, porn actors etc; and likewise for women’s sports. Good, huh?
ZJWParticipant1) What is the explanation for (at least) 20% lost audio from when Keith Scholey was speaking? Very disappointing.
2) I am very much looking forward to eventually hearing a recording of the other Keith (Graham) speaking on POLITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS: WHAT LESSON CAN WE LEARN FROM MARX? and hope there won’t be a similarly missing 20%.
3) During the discussion, an individual identified as ‘Adam’ mentioned that the SPGB has in its archives a full set (he didn’t say ‘full set’, but I assume it’s so) of the mentioned International Review.
For the interested, titles of all articles in International Review, 1936-1938 can be seen here:
https://mrc-catalogue.warwick.ac.uk/records/MSH/1/133
There is a piece by the mysterious Roberto in every or nearly every issue.
The frequently seen name Jonathan Ayres among the authors rings a bell, but I can’t remember in what connection. (Anarchist? Bordigist??)
-
AuthorPosts