ZJW
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
A bit more here on various sorts of anti-zionism among Jews:
https://jewishvoiceforpeace.org/a-partial-history-of-jewish-alternatives/
This group — Jewish Voice for Peace — identifies itself as anti-zionist and pro-BDS.
Further on the BBC program:
Similar:
Mention of it doesn’t come to mind, but I suppose the existence of this site must have been noted?
http://www.labouragainstthewitchhunt.org
The Northites about the BBC program:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/07/13/pano-j13.html?view=article_mobile
Much of this is incomprehensible to me but smarter people might find it useful:
https://en.internationalism.org/forum/1056/jk1921/14962/recent-attacks-icc-libcom?page=1
You might begin at random from poster d-man’s July 2019 posts. (Libcom regulars will recognise him despite the new name.)
I wondered that too ………..
This I guess: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_binary.
and
And this as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_opposition#Deconstruction_of_binaries
A white nationalist on the consequences of Yang’s UBI proposal:
The Northites comments against it:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/07/04/soci-j04.html?view=article_mobile
The conference denounced by other leftists:
Criticism of Yang by a supporter (?) for his disastrous performance (failure to put emphasis on his automation issue) in the recent multi-candidate TV debate:
https://gizmodo.com/automation-should-be-a-major-2020-issue-andrew-yang-fa-1835939592
I would like to point out something supplemental to my post #132559 regarding cultural zionists or ‘semi-zionists’ (?) that while supporting Jewish immigration to Mandate Palestine, opposed partition (ie two states) but rather were in favor of a single bi-ethnic state:From a recent reading (Zachary Lockman: Comrades and Enemies – Arab and Jewish Workers in Palestine, 1906–1948, which is online on libcom), I see that at least some of these groups supported a system of political parity, such that it would not matter whether the Jewish or non-Jewish population was in the majority.A very good book by the way, or especially the earlier parts of it.(I put a question mark after ‘semi-zionist’ because to my mind, zionism means a *Jewish* state.)- Yes, he should be challenged to a debate.
- Is the rest of it missing,or does the postcard really end with “You describe as ‘preposterous’ the idea that people would be prepared to work at such jobs, or any job, ‘for nothing’.”?
Robbo’s #187584 is very clearly stated.
Question:
If it is not in too bad taste to ask, can someone tell me whether the the position of the ‘Socialist Studies’ splittists differ from what he has said, and if so, how?
