Young Master Smeet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 3,084 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mod Log #250899

    Forums › General discussion › Russian Tensions

    #250887
    #250891
    #250894


    @Ozymandias

    Your strong feelings and experiences are noted, but we can’t permit topics to be derailed or abusive posts about other forum members. you are welcome to post on this topic, I’d recommend creating a thread in the World Socialist Movement board.

    1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.

    7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

    @Bijou Drains
    #250895

    2. The forums proper are intended for public discussion. Personal messages between participants should be sent via private message or by e-mail.

    Your comments and intentions seemed to me to be worthy, but in cleaning out the thread I had to remove the, and also, as above, rule 2 applies.

    in reply to: George Galloway to vote Tory #250834

    https://www.newsweek.com/lauren-boebert-theater-fondling-scandal-1839324

    “Boebert gained a national spotlight in September after reports emerged that she and a date had been kicked out of a production of Beetlejuice: The Musical at downtown Denver’s Buell Theater due to their allegedly inappropriate behavior. Despite the lawmaker’s initial denial of wrongdoing, security camera footage was later released showing Boebert vaping in the theater and fondling her date in a seemingly sexual manner.”

    She begins her speeches in congress by shouting ‘glory to god’…

    in reply to: George Galloway to vote Tory #250818

    To their credit their definition of working class is sound, and anyone talking about a planned economy is useful because at least it gets those sorts of ideas on the table. Notably, their ideas don’t seem to far really from the Wilson government, so they say nationalisation isn’t necessary, so long as businesses work with the ‘national plan’: better than TUSC and assorted left of Labour ideas over recent years, but the reality is that much like the SSP and the SLP it’s a one man vehicle. That they’re advertising for non-members to stand, is an interesting big tent approach.

    in reply to: George Galloway to vote Tory #250810

    Galloway claims to be a Bennite

    “I’m a disciple of the late Mr Benn. We stand for common-sense British social-ism.”

    Re: Hamilton, I’m afraid he thinks Starmer is Israel’s puppet, there are a lot of dangerous ideas swirling around that many ‘leftists’ are carelessly picking up.

    in reply to: George Galloway to vote Tory #250799

    John Hamilton’s election page

    Seems to be working fine.

    Interesting mishmash of policies, including abolishing the Mayoralty itself and repudiating the salary. Interesting to watch.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #250659

    Aaron Bushnell sent the video of him burning himself to death to an Anarchist group (that is not a link to the video, I won’t).

    “My name is Aaron Bushnell. I am an active-duty member of the US Air Force and I will no longer be complicit in genocide. I’m about to engage in an extreme act of protest—but compared to what people have been experiencing in Palestine at the hands of their colonizers, it’s not extreme at all. This is what our ruling class has decided will be normal.”

    The socialist attitude is to ‘live for the cause’, but there is no denying the calm determined decision Bushnell made to die such a horrible death.

    I hope no-one else makes this choice, but it is a symptom of a world run mad.

    in reply to: George Galloway to vote Tory #250543

    Interestingly, Engels once advocated voting Tory:

    “What Aveling told me confirms the suspicion I already had, namely, that Keir Hardie secretly cherishes the wish to lead the new party in a dictatorial way, just as Parnell led the Irish, and that moreover he tends to sympathise with the Conservative Party rather than the Liberal opposition. He publicly declares that Parnell’s experiment, which compelled Gladstone to give in, ought to be repeated at the next election and where it is impossible to nominate a Labour candidate one should vote for the Conservatives, in order to show the Liberals the power of the party. Now this is a policy which under definite circumstances I myself recommended to the English; however, if at the very outset one does not announce it as a possible tactical move but proclaims it as tactics to be followed under any circumstances, then it smells strongly of Champion.”

    in reply to: Labour Party facing bankruptcy #250454

    You’d have to have a heart of shit not to laugh:
    Labour have disowned their by-election candidate (but their free mailout is still going out tomorrow, too late to cancel).
    They’ve disowned another candidate.
    Sue Gray is in trouble for unlawful leak investigations.

    The fish rots from the head down; when will Kier apologise?

    They’re briefing and leaking like fiends: they may yet throw the election.

    This is too funny for words.

    in reply to: Political Primary Network #250285

    I was going to dredge up that quote: but also, we need to watch out for the fascist bogey.

    It’s no coincidence that the fash vote goes up under Labour governments, it suites them and the Tories. Look at France: Macron has nothing to offer the French, except that he is not the Front National, even while stealing their policies. In America, Biden is relying on the gamble that people will vote for him, while offering them nothing, because he is not Trump. It’s the magicians trick of ‘forcing’ a card on their mark. You need to vote for what you want, not against something.

    in reply to: Refugees #250215

    Already answered:

    “the first point is honest debate is needed to try and change people’s minds alongside social practices that bring people together, a worldwide movement that attacks the reactionary interests everywhere.”

    In the scenario you paint, the refugees are just as likely to be socialists from across the globe as reactionaries, and the movement in their own countries would be having these debates.

    People’s mind can change (quite quickly) and if they can’t, then socialism will never happen.

    in reply to: Mod Log #250212

    Binned post/thread.

    Forums › General discussion › King Charles is dead.
    #250210

    1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.

    “Forum aims and scope
    The SPGB web forums are operated by the Socialist Party of Great Britain (SPGB) and are intended to promote discussion of matters related to the SPGB, the World Socialist Movement, and socialism in general.”

    This post belonged in the off-topic forum.

    in reply to: Refugees #250208

    I think the first error here is seeing refugees/foreigners as a uniform bloc of reactionary ideas: there are reactionary people enough in the UK, what is important is the material basis for said reaction, mostly around trying to secure jobs, and seeing ‘others’ getting all the benefits.

    Lets not forget the propagandistic aims of British capitalists in trying to pain foreigners as reactionary others: these claims were all made about the Irish centuries ago: it’s about building a coalition to protect their wealth as Britain’s rulers. the propaganda of a universal worldwide society without nations and borders would intrinsically challenge that.

    So, the first point is honest debate is needed to try and change people’s minds alongside social practices that bring people together, a worldwide movement that attacks the reactionary interests everywhere.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #250104

    Declassified have taken a look at the self-defence angle

    “Foreign Office says only one British merchant vessel was targeted by Houthis before the RAF bombed Yemen. And it was registered in the Cayman Islands.”

    The British government concept of interest is very expansive.

    in reply to: Lenin still dead – after 100 years #250037

    Ah, and they’re giving the supplement away Here

    in reply to: Lenin still dead – after 100 years #250036

    That’s a good article, and surprisingly well informed for the time: no annexations no indemnities was the standard Social Democrat agreed position at the time (though they added no separate peace): interestingly, one of the articles in the Star makes a virtue of Lenin’s accommodation with the peasantry into a virtue. I’ll plug the hell out of that article.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 3,084 total)