TrueScotsman
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
“When was Russia invaded? When was there any attack on Russia?”
When Donbass was recognised as independent it sought protection from Russia against Ukrainian agression.
“Russia illegally under UN Charter intervened in another country’s civil war.”
Scott Ritter has demonstrated that Russia’s actions were not illegal under international law.
https://scheerpost.com/2022/04/01/russia-ukraine-the-law-of-war-crime-of-aggression/
“Stephan articles are always on the spot The concept of false flag is a term widely used by the conspiracists theoriticians”
Right, false flags are like unicorns, they don’t exist. Moron Socialista, there are entire branches of the military that do nothing but manufacture lies and false flags. It’s called miltary deception. Back to kindergarten for you.
“here the Russians can define it as a military target as indirectly related to military use”
The electrical grid is not indirectly related to military use it is directly related to military use. Ukraine’s trains run on electricity. To stop them transporting troops and war material around the country the Russians must cut the power.
Will that make life difficult for the civilian population? Very much so but it will also shorten the war. A shorter war means fewer civilian casualties.
Russia did not start this war Ukraine/NATOstan did. As with any side that starts a war all the horrors that result are their direct responsibility.
“People, like many who write rubbish on Quora, who are blase about nuclear exchanges, have really no realistic concept of the power of such weapons.”
Well I’ll be darned, something we actually agree on.
“In which case Zelinsky has overreached himself and has shot himself in the foot by lying.”
All-in with reactionaries everywhere your naivete would be touching if you were like under 12. Zelensky does nothing but lie. He’s been lying since he came into office. Since when has he paid a price? Never! Lord man, grow up.
“Surely to bring pressure on NATO to intervene militarily.”
Exactly, Lizzie! Good to know there’s at least one other person on this site with a bit of common sense.
“Instead of looking for some conspiratorial cause”
All-in with the Guardian’s narrative is going to ignore the possibility this is an attempted false flag despite the fact that the missiles were flying in the wrong direction to shoot down incoming Russian missiles, that Ukraine has a history of
carrying out false flag operations including Bucha, the attack on the opera house and the bombing of the maternity hospital in Mariuopol to name but three, that Zelensky continues to insist Russia was responsible and that NATO’s intervention is the only thing that can stave off the annihilation of the Ukrainian military. But no, All-in with the CIA doesn’t believe any of that even merits consideration.“The IAEA dismissed TS pet theory that Ukraine was planning a dirty nuke bomb”
The agency was only given permission to investigate three sites despite the fact Ukraine has many more where such a weapon could be manufactured. The IAEA has also shown itself either incompetent or compromised when its investigators insisted that they had no idea which side could have been shelling the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant.
“Russia itself now accepts that conclusion by the IAEA”
Russian officials have made no such statement.
“As for the WSPUS assessment, TS may claim it supports his view but it runs counter that Russia is preparing a Winter War”
I was specifically referring to the claims about Kherson and nothing else.
“In the coming days, the verdict of Dutch judges trial in absentia of three Russians and a Donbass separatist into the downing of MH-17 civil airliner will be published.”
It’s guaranteed to be a whitewash. The Dutch are US butt-boys, the crash site was compromised from the very start and Russia was excluded from the investigation.
Ukrainian missile strikes in Poland probably a false flag attempt.
“Ukrainian forces have ‘recaptured’ Kherson. This, however, is the result not of a battle for the city but of a decision by the new Russian commander to withdraw from areas west of the River Dnieper. Russian supply lines had become too extended and were too vulnerable to attack. Although the withdrawal was in response to real military achievement on the part of Ukrainian forces, talk of Ukraine ‘winning the war’ bears no relation to reality. On the contrary, Ukraine now faces a sharp deterioration in its position.”
Fancy that, just as I was saying. Are you a Putinist now too?
Russia is helping to usher in a new, multipolar, anti-imperialist world order.
https://multipolarista.com/2022/11/10/crisis-capitalism-imperialism-fascism/
Still waiting Bojo’s Brain. I’m often criticised by your very self for not addressing questions put to me. So, care to comment on China’s continuing support of Russia or instead, are you just going to pretend you’re a Tween Vogue pseudo-scientist?
So Bojo’s Brain, looks like China still has Russia’s back afterall. Care to offer your inane, uninformed opinion on the matter?
All-in I specifically asked you about that very thing a ways back and you cleared it. Why on earth is that needlessly offensive? It’s not offensive at all. Who’s gonna be offended by that? Lol
