TrueScotsman
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
““The USSR was never in an alliance with Nazi Germany.””
The footage shows Nazi Germany ceding former Polish territory, which was actually former Soviet territory taken from it by Poland in the 1920s, as per the agreement on “spheres of influence” to Soviet troops. Neither side was in an alliance. The truth about the events is explained in great detail by Grover Furr.
Grover Furr: Did the Soviet Union Invade Poland in September 1939? (The answer: No, it did not.)
“Thinking one person is a bellend doesn’t preclude you from thinking that that person’s enemy is also a bellend.”
Then why didn’t the Little Britains build a Zelensky bellend statue? Because they love Nazi Zelensky. They love Nazi Zelensky because they’re Little Britain MSM zombies who’ve been told just what to think by their betters. So think it they do like good little children.
“I know that is a bit complicated for your binary thought processes.”
So where’s the Zelensky bellend statue?
“Think about it this way –
Person A living in 1942 does not like the policies and actions of Stalin”
You mean the capitalist classes of imperialist Europe?
“Stalin is at war with Hitler”
Actually, since you love to be the pedant, Nazi Germany and its European fascist allies were at war with the USSR.
“this does not mean that person A is a Nazi”
But they could be.
“Stalin is in a supportive alliance”
BS. The USSR was never in an alliance with Nazi Germany.
“supplying large amounts or raw materials and armaments to Hitler”
They were trading and not at war with one another.
“this does not necessarily mean that person B is an anti Nazi”
But they might be.
“Do you get someone else to do the little mathematical problem required to log on to this forum?”
Oh child, is that the best you got? Run along and play. The teeter-totter is over there by the monkey bars.
“It’s just nothing you have posted on this forum indicates that you have the intellectual ability to actually complete the process independently.”
What a sharp tongue. You been eating razor blades for breakfast? I’ll try not to cry myself to sleep. Lol
“Oh and by the way Britain is the name of the country”
And the sketch comedy series Little Britain. What a droll.
“Can you explain how you de-Nazify three-quarters of Ukrainian males and two-thirds of Ukrainian women?”
I should think they’ll mostly de-Nazify themselves after the shock of being militarily defeated. Shouldn’t be too much longer now.
“TN, look, Putin wins uk vote!”
How charming. The little Britains choose to support Nazis. But then, there’s a history of that isn’t there.
http://worldwartwo.filminspector.com/2014/09/channel-islands.html
“The outlook for Ukrainian workers, much like their counterparts in Russia, looks grim”
The link says nothing about “grim prospects” for Russian workers.
“Liberals have got sod all to do with a socialist class-conscious opposition to nationalism and capitalism. So what’s your point in even mentioning this?”
She’s Russian, a member of the working class and was opposed to the war with Ukraine. She’s the very kind of person you knuckle heads are speaking of when you hope “the people” will overthrow Putin. She went to Donbass to work as a translator on a documentary. There she saw the reality of Ukrainian fascist terror with her own eyes, realised the shit she was reading in rags like the Guardian was all a bunch of lies and changed her views on the SMO. You mock her without knowing anything about her or having watched the video. You’re a hateful and willfully ignorant clown that isn’t even funny enough to be a joke. Lol
“If I chose the same way as you do of citing only overtly pro-Russian sources, I could flood this topic with pro-Ukrainian propaganda sources.”
I cite sources that are telling the truth. Nothing more, nothing less. And the truth is, Russia is fighting a fascist regime and its NATOstani backers and is winning.
“However, I choose to limit my links to those who try to be relatively balanced in their view.”
Well, I hate to rain on your parade but the war ain’t “balanced”. One side is winning resoundingly, the other is losing catastrophically.
“Using the term troglodyte isn’t racist”
Lol, All-in with the racists is now defending racist slurs. So Putin is a cave dwelling Neanderthal is he? Interesting but unimportant.
“but reference to the claims that Putin was not fully informed about much of the reality of the war’s progress”
Lol. What you smoking? Do share.
“and Russia’s political and diplomatic isolation leading it to becoming a pariah state like the hermit country of North Korea.”
Erm, back in the real world Russia has many friends. You know NATOstan isn’t “the world”, right?
“You misunderstood the reference to Russia and western analysts seeking Russia defeat. The author is being critical of such a strategy and like other analysts suggest that there has to be a peace agreement where Putin saves faces and no total defeat.”
Either way it’s delusional. Zelensky and his NATOstani handlers are facing total defeat not Putin.
“Say that to the soldiers in mud-filled trenches enduring incessant shell-fire, being killed to claim a little bit more of no-mans-land.”
Lol. You forgot about the mud. Lotsa mud. Oh dear, just like Agincourt! This war is Agincourt 2.0!
“It has transformed into a static stand-off, at least for the present.”
Russia has taken four towns around Bhakmut in just the last few days. Does that sound static to you?
“Even Putin no longer believes in a speedy finish to the war as you have several times suggested in the past until quite recently when you now concede it might be a year-long conflict going on to end of 2023.”
You’re getting so Zen now All-in. How “long” is “long”? While you’re at it, is Putin a man dreaming he’s a butterfly or a butterfly dreaming he’s a man?
“You believe once the ground is hard, the Russian tanks will crush the Ukrainian defences”
That is what most analysts expect. Though there are some who believe Russia will just continue to use its artillery, missiles and air-force to ever so slowly grind the Ukrainians to dust. The Russians lose less men that way but it’ll take longer. Either way Ukraine faces catastrophic defeat.
“who will have run out of ammunition”
The math doesn’t lie. Even MSM articles are beginning to admit the truth of the matter.
“and Ukraine will be forced into an unconditional surrender”
Yes, just like WW2 Germany.
“Ukraine will become a willing partner in a new Russian union.”
I’ve never said that. But the new Ukrainian state will at the very least be neutral and in time will no doubt see the advantages of ever closer ties with Russia.
“I possess no background in military, diplomacy or media literacy.”
There, fixed it for you.
“I defer to those who do have the requisite knowledge and experience.”
No, you refer to MSM hacks and propagandists.
“From all your earlier replies, you have no wish or desire to understand anything that diverges from your own entrenched opinions”
The only thing I’m concerned about is the truth.
“that are based upon a few aberrant journalists”
Though I have little regard for the man I appreciate the sentiment, “speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act – George Orwell”
“and Russian media, reinforcing the bizarre idiosyncratic world-view on history and events that you have had from long before this war began.”
Anti-imperialist analysis is bizarre to you? Why am I not surprised?
“Bijou Drain was definitely on to something when he posted that you possess a personality disorder.”
Oh, so you’ve joined the staff of Tween Vogue too now? My horoscope? I’m sure you remember I’m an Aquarium.
How a Russian liberal learned to support the SMO.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OysQ7yQl_o&ab_channel=JohnMarkDougan
“Another analysis for peace”
Lol. You say analysis” I say “an-anal-ass”. No wonder you’re so misinformed All-in with the warmongers. BS in BS out.
“Only the United States can offer the concessions that Russia presumably will seek to end the war. These concessions would include no NATO membership for Ukraine; closing the U.S. base in Poland; and ending the rotation of forces through the Baltic states that were once Soviet republics. As a result, President Vladimir Putin possibly would consider yielding some of the Ukrainian territory that Russia occupies”
Not a chance. The Russians won’t be giving up any territory. Ukraine has lost it for good. To the victor goes the spoils.
“although Crimea is probably a done deal and will never be returned.”
“Probably”? Erm, no “probably” about it.
“Ukraine believes that its military can regain all of the occupied territory, but that is extremely unlikely without much more lethal weaponry from the United States.”
Only nukes can defeat Russia. That’s it.
“Western analysts believe that Russia must be defeated to ensure that Moscow will not try to use force against another Western neighbor.”
Scott Ritter is a “western analyst” and he doesn’t believe that. I can name plenty of others.
“For all practical purposes, the Russian military has already been defeated on the battlefield and will be in no position to open another front”
Lol. Pure copium. Those words won’t age well.
“particularly with a NATO member.”
Lol, I’d like to see them try. The devastation of Ukraine was accomplished with only 10% of Russian forces. See what happens if they mobilise the lot.
“If Russia sustains greater losses in the near term, it is possible that Putin will be replaced by a greater troglodyte”
Nice bit of racism there. That aside, what planet is this guy living on? Russian military deaths are but a tiny fraction of those of Ukraine.
“who will resort to even more brutal and savage use of force.”
Putin will not lose power so the point is moot but Putin has been going soft on his Slavic neighbor. Against NATO there will be no such mercy.
“In any event, prolonged fighting is not on the side of a rational or reasonable outcome.”
Russia can keep the current level of conflict going almost indefinitely. Ukraine’s military is on the brink of collapse so the war won’t continue much longer.
Probably a year at most.“We have always argued that Ukraine would have to surrender land for peace.”
That and the Nazis.
“I am sure TS will dispute that Russia has lost any chance of total victory”
I sure do.
“much like the WW1 generals who always believed in that one final push would succeed.”
This conflict is nothing like WW1.
“And I have been raising the prospect of a possible power-grab in the Kremlin.”
Yes, because you’re a MSM zombie spared the taxation of holding a single original thought.
Some in the MSM are waking up to reality.
https://www.newsweek.com/lessons-us-civil-war-show-why-ukraine-cant-win-opinion-1764992
“I am afraid that engaging the Voice of Moscow here on this sort of thing is allowing him to land a few punches (besides distracting from the main aim of this forum).”
I’m nobodies voice but my own. I tell the truth as I see it always based on evidence. I’ve been called the voice of Sadaam, Gadaafi, Maduro, Assad and now Putin. So, I either have a multiple personality disorder or I’m an anti-imperialist undermining imperialist war narratives. You think I’m the former and in doing so you reveal what you really are, a reactionary who uses MSM shaming tactics to attempt to shut down critical voices. Well, fcuk you and every one like you. I don’t give a crap if you call me a Putinist, Putin apologist, voice of Moscow whatever the fcuk I’m gonna keep undermining the MSM imperialist narrative. At least you got one thing right ALB, your fellow “party” members are making fools of themselves regurgitating imperialist MSM talking points.
“The Kremlin never lies.”
I’ve never made any such claim. Your frustration is showing All-in with the CIA. You are reduced to telling lies in a pathetic attempt to discredit me.
Amnesty International, hummff… well-known CIA mouthpiece
Yawn.
Amnesty International: Navalny a Prisoner of Conscience. But not Manning, Assange or Mandela
https://www.blackagendareport.com/us-path-war-china-what-be-done#_edn1
Propagandist for Syria terror proxies compromised Amnesty International, leaked docs show
“Russian soldiers are humanitarians, isn’t that so?”
Killing Nazis is a service to humanity. Or do you disagree All-in with the NAZIs?
“”Yes, of course, Bucha was a staged false flag op””
You clearly don’t think so because you are a Guardian Bro. It’s already told you it was a Russian atrocity so you dutifully accept the narrative as fact. The evidence proves otherwise. I’ve already provided links.
“And we all know that Wikipedia is a CIA outlet so we won’t believe any claims that are contrary to what Russia says.”
Yawn.
Phillip Cross: The Mystery Wikipedia Editor Targeting Anti-War Sites
Wikipedia formally censors The Grayzone as regime-change advocates monopolize editing
“So, just in case you shout “fake news” which is your usual response to any argument put to you”
Rubbish. You have a better description for false reporting?
“it is from the same site that you yourself endorsed”
The site is of no import, the content is. Some right, some wrong. You judge it on its merits.
“It confirms everything I have said. There is a natural affinity between the Putin capitalist regime and the far right.”
No, there isn’t.
“I am not surprised that someone like yourself with your own quasi-fascist ultra-nationalist and vehemently pro-capitalist views should look up to and admire an authoritarian “strongman” figurehead like Putin.”
Lol. I support Russia’s struggle against Nazism and NATOstani aggression. Nothing more nothing less.
“The irony is that the Zelensky regime is in precisely the same camp, ideologically speaking – a corrupt, authoritarian far-right regime.”
Erm, no. Kiev is fascist, Moscow is not. To suggest otherwise reveals your true self: a cross-eyed, foaming at the mouth, tin foil
hat wearing MSM zombie.“It wouldn’t take much for you to suddenly switch sides and start calling the Russians, “Nazis””
That was kind of out of left field. I have no idea what you’re talking about. Happens quite a lot actually.
