Thomas_More

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,306 through 1,320 (of 1,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Tensions #234007
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    “Next they’ll be referring to the Protestants of Northern Ireland as “ethnic Britons”.”

    You mean Welsh.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233994
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Re: Pol Pot, Mao, etc. The Taipings were similar in their lethality. Mixing a semi-Christian fanaticism with their peasant ardour and the cult-like hero-worship we see in Maoist sects, they executed homosexuals and other minorities and deified their leaders.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233993
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Movimiento, do the Trotskyists also espouse “national liberation.”

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233969
    Thomas_More
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233968
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Well said, Alan. Chinese Leninists are full of “national liberation”, unless you are Formosan, Vietnamese, Tibetan, Uighur, etc. That’s why they supported Pol Pot (liberate people from life!) Idi Amin, and, finally Nixon and Thatcher.
    I cannot recommend enough the superb book, A TRAGIC LIBERATION, whose author I will give here in a moment.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233966
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Well said, Bijou. Could it be that TS is … a coward!?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233965
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Lenin didn’t give a fig about his “national liberation” balderdash unless it suited him and the “Communist” Party.
    He sent Trotsky to butcher the Ukrainian peasantry and the Makhnovists, even though it was Makhno who had crushed the Whites and had saved Moscow.
    Lenin also sent his Red Army thugs to destroy the democratic Menshevik govt in Georgia and the Siberian Makhnovist soviets.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233940
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    So, without necessity, he’s going to nuke us, the populations of the West?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233929
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Bosnia/Srpska conflict close to flaring up again (Aljazeera).

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233928
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    60% of Japan’s military supplies came from the USA before America entered WW2, and while Japan was attacking China. Germany supplied China against its ally Japan, while Americans privately helped Chiang via the Burma airlift.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233927
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Hitler’s stand was also anti-imperialist. Like Putin, he proclaimed “Our patience is at an end”, referring to the stifling of Germany by the colonial powers Britain and France and the exclusion of Germany from markets.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233917
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Putin’s paean to Imperial Russia is anti-imperialist? I think I hear Catherine the Great laughing.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #233912
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Weren’t the Khmer Rouge “anti-imperialist”?

    in reply to: China is Capitalist #233884
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    In fact, in France the peasantry was mostly royalist. It was the nascent urban working class of the towns who joined the bourgeoisie and became its force.
    Of course, a section of the bourgeoisie of France had married into the aristocracy and been ennobled. They emigrated. Sade refers to them as the upstarts ennobled since Louis XIV, whom they paid for titles. They were called the noblesse de robe.

    in reply to: China is Capitalist #233875
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    “The Chinese Stalinists led by Mao Zedong (Mao Tse-tung) developed a particularly demented version of Stalinist doublespeak. “Capitalism” ceased to mean a concrete form of property relations; “following the capitalist road” became an epithet to be thrown at Mao’s opponents in the bureaucracy. Students were hailed as “proletarian revolutionaries” while being cynically mobilized to break workers strikes during the intrabureaucratic war known as the “Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution.” In Mao-speak, the struggle against supposed “Soviet social-imperialism” justified China’s rapprochement with the real American imperialists at the height of their dirty, losing war against the Vietnamese Revolution.
    The bureaucrats who rule in the Forbidden City continue to call themselves “Communists” as they scramble to enrich themselves and their progeny and seek to become part of a new class of capitalist exploiters on the Chinese mainland.” (Spartacist, no. 53, Summer 1997).

Viewing 15 posts - 1,306 through 1,320 (of 1,664 total)