Thomas_More

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,703 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Good News: And No Religion, Too #237227
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    What’s that?

    in reply to: Good News: And No Religion, Too #237223
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Religion had nothing to do with belief in ancient Rome, nor does it in Hinduism, Buddhism etc. Religion meant social performance, or ritual, and represented social cohesion. In Hinduism it was interlaced with the stages of life: childhood, parenthood, vocation and old age. It could be argued that the lack of attention to the stages of life is why so many under modern capitalism are so obsessed with sex, into old age even. They have no trajectory, their lives frittered away by the wages system or by social exclusion.

    The monotheistic big three are the belief-oriented cults, where one’s belief in a deity is paramount. This also explains their historical intolerance.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 1 month ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: Good News: And No Religion, Too #237221
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I always say hello to magpies, and ravens, crows, chuffs, foxes etc. Not out of superstition, but respect. So did the Japanese of old.

    in reply to: Good News: And No Religion, Too #237214
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    It’s the same delusion as the self/soul. The fact that we think etc. creates the illusion that there is an “I” that “inhabits” our “bodies” – so that the fact that it is a part of the body thinking etc. is blurred, but also fiercely resisted.

    in reply to: Good News: And No Religion, Too #237139
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Wish it were the same with nationalism. Patriotism is the most dangerous religion of all, is more prevalent than ever, and its gods are national flags.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237137
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    BD – “Do you think that Hitler, Churchill, Stalin, Tojo, Saddam or Roosevelt would have accepted complete defeat without going for the final option?”

    And Putin is already being pushed toward that. And NATO isn’t backing off.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237126
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    How can Putin even resign or face an election again, unless his own party wins, without fear of arrest? He can only resign if replaced by another of his own party, or at least an anti-NATOist.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237123
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Would he not opt for nuclear war, thinking he and his family have a bunker, if the alternative is to lose the presidency and be arrested?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237122
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    BD – “if a conventional war broke out between NATO and Russia (which won’t happen for lots of reasons, but mainly because it would escalate to a nuclear conflict very quickly.”

    Are you saying both sides will forever back down from it through fear of nuclear war?
    But what if Putin continues to be denied a way out and NATO keeps backing him into a corner?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237115
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    So everyone, from the puppy and new-born baby to the old farmworker whose home is now a pile of rubble, is a Nazi.

    Bet you think the bombing of Dresden was wonderful too?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237114
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Even Putin doesn’t pretend to that.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237100
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    “You are not socialists. You hate socialists and every socialist government that has ever existed. Just like liberals do.”

    And you support inflicting misery, cold, mutilation and death on masses of people because you say the top government brass are Nazis. So much for your “socialism.”
    The workers are 99% of the world’s population, so to say we care about nothing but …
    Lastly, “socialist government” is a contradiction in terms. Government implies a state, and a state is for a minority to oppress the majority with. So your “socialists” are a minority oppressing the workers, as in the USSR and China. You are, frankly, ignorant.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237063
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    [deleted by the moderator as unnecessarily derogatory]

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #237062
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    TS hasn’t even read Groucho, let alone Karl.

    in reply to: A Movement of Movements #237015
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Everyone i’ve spoken to takes great offence at the idea that they are wage-slaves. If you mildly suggest that they’re a wage-slave, say goodbye to any amity or solidarity.
    If you call them, with yourself, a member of the working class, they walk away in disgust.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 1 month ago by Thomas_More.
Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,703 total)