Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Not really, because we’ll never need any paper again.
Today’s nuclear missiles EACH have multiple warheads: that’s EACH ONE multiple thermo-nuclear bombs, thousands of times more powerful than what struck Hiroshima.
Nor would only one or two of these missiles be fired, but hundreds.Safe to say, we would all, on these islands, be obliterated in seconds.
But, despite all this, the DPP president of Taiwan herself has NOT proclaimed independence, and the US will advise her not to.
The Kuomintang are also mounting anti-independence marches, and that should satisfy China, which will nonetheless continue flexing its military might, as it has always done whenever independence is hinted at.
Thanks, ALB, for the elucidation. I am no longer bothering with Youtube videos on the subject. One can easily get sucked into catastrophism.
Yes, but in 1962 the Soviet Union was not facing war on its borders, threatening its regime’s existence, so it could back down.
But it obliges all of NATO to officially declare war, whereas at the moment it is unofficial. And surely, where Europe is concerned, an official and open war with Russia could not but be nuclear.
What if Article 5 is triggered? Movimiento says no nuclear weapons will ever be used, but, because of Article 5, NATO will be obliged to, won’t it?
Youtubers are really hyping up the nuclear war angle; really pushing catastrophism.
Do you think all this military muscle-flexing by all states at the moment is to divert workers from class issues and climate change? And to reinforce patriotic hysteria?
What is the real reason they are doing all this now, more than the usual?
Now that TS is gone, I want to ask again: why is Russia the only power constantly threatening nuclear use?
