Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Thomas_MoreParticipant
Lavish expense alongside abject poverty in Washington DC:
Thomas_MoreParticipantChaplin summed it up physically when, pursued in the U.S. and shot at in Mexico, he straddles the border and walks with one foot on either side.
Similarly, Jean Genet as an unwanted vagrant played hopskotch on the German/Polish border.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by Thomas_More.
Thomas_MoreParticipantYep. Read the links elsewhere on this thread about “Atomic Orthodoxy.”
Thomas_MoreParticipant“Now, Ukraine will be reduced to a parking lot, its people to penury.” (TS)
Makes you happy, eh?
“Liberate” people by reducing them to penury.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by Thomas_More.
Thomas_MoreParticipantDid he?
Wasn’t he dead soon after independence?
Can you quote him on the matter, because i’m sure you are wrong.Thomas_MoreParticipantBut are they capable of long-term thinking?
Thomas_MoreParticipantAlthough Hungary is in NATO?
How would that work then?Thomas_MoreParticipantRussian and Belarus propaganda, in comparison to NATO’s, is old-fashioned and crude.
Thomas_MoreParticipantThat is a Belarus report. To be taken likewise with a pinch of salt.
Thomas_MoreParticipantThe Christians, who held and hold a belief-based religion, were called atheists by the Romans. The Roman ruling class was what we would term today atheist, but only used the word to describe the Christian cult. This was because, for the Romans and others in the Roman world, religion meant the social etiquette of the rites. The Christians alone refused to participate in these. They also were intent on converting others, which meant discouraging others from participation in the principal forms of social etiquette and behaviour. Hence, the Christians were “atheists.”
The Jews were known, likewise, for rejecting the rites in favour of their Unknown God, but in their case it was an ethnicity phenomenon and was therefore tolerated, except in times of revolt. But the Christians were seducing good Romans and others away from the rites, so could not be tolerated. The Jews were leaving others alone. The Christians were not.
Thomas_MoreParticipantLooked them up. Just confirms what I was saying: lives distorted by the emptiness and frustrations engendered by life under modern capitalism; life without structure and worth.
Thomas_MoreParticipantClassic work on the social consciousness film in the silent era: Behind the Mask of Innocence by Kevin Brownlow.
Thomas_MoreParticipantWhat’s that?
Thomas_MoreParticipantReligion had nothing to do with belief in ancient Rome, nor does it in Hinduism, Buddhism etc. Religion meant social performance, or ritual, and represented social cohesion. In Hinduism it was interlaced with the stages of life: childhood, parenthood, vocation and old age. It could be argued that the lack of attention to the stages of life is why so many under modern capitalism are so obsessed with sex, into old age even. They have no trajectory, their lives frittered away by the wages system or by social exclusion.
The monotheistic big three are the belief-oriented cults, where one’s belief in a deity is paramount. This also explains their historical intolerance.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 12 months ago by Thomas_More.
Thomas_MoreParticipantI always say hello to magpies, and ravens, crows, chuffs, foxes etc. Not out of superstition, but respect. So did the Japanese of old.
-
AuthorPosts