Thomas_More

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,685 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Tensions #242537
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    ” there are Anarchist groups who have published some of our publications and some have made translation of our publications and they have been published, ”

    AK Press, based in Edinburgh, but also in the US, stocks our pamphlets, and Anarchist classics we respect and agree with, such as MUTUAL AID. The Anarchists suffered as genuine socialists did at the hands of the Bolsheviks, and, with us, they opposed World War II.

    in reply to: Chinese Tensions #242493
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    China was then in no position to fight the U.S., except in a proxy war like Korea. And Stalin, I think, would have left Mao on his own.
    Chiang at that time was talking about the retaking of mainland China, which Taiwan today can’t possibly consider.
    Also, KMT forces were launching forays from Burma.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #242489
    Thomas_More
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Tensions #242488
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    But Zelensky is adamant about the return of Crimea, and I don’t see NATO anytime soon advising him to accept a deal.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #242486
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    So if Ukrainian forces with NATO supplies push into Crimea, nuclear missiles will be launched?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #242480
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    But America etc. isn’t saying it out loud every day, unlike Medvedev & Co.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #242478
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Why is Russia the only power threatening the use of nuclear weapons?

    in reply to: Chinese Tensions #242464
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    But this makes them as impervious to genuine amity as it does to genuine enmity.

    As Voltaire says, crooks have accomplices, not friends. So I suppose it boils down to the definition of “buddy.”

    In any case, Chiang and Mao were definitely on each other’s death list.

    And please note, Movimiento, that we both have the same understanding of socialism, and I am quite well-read, starting from childhood.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: Chinese Tensions #242452
    Thomas_More
    Participant
    in reply to: Chinese Tensions #242451
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    They made a reluctant alliance in 1936. The arbiter of that alliance, Chang Hsueh-liang, was punished with lifelong house arrest on Taiwan.

    Why take Hoxha, himself a tyrant, as an authority?

    in reply to: Chinese Tensions #242450
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    ” Look like ‘buddies’ to me… ”

    ???

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #242449
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    A samurai would have dignity.

    in reply to: Chinese Tensions #242426
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    No, I don’t think Chiang and Mao were “buddies” at all. Both came from the Kuomintang, of course. It was with reluctance that Chiang, after being kidnapped, agreed to a united front in 1936.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #242425
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Since we are in TS’s mind so little and pathetic, isn’t it bizarre that, all the way from Japan (where he tells us he is) he expends daily so much time and energy here, on us?

    in reply to: Chinese Tensions #242407
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    It’s paradoxical that the party of Chiang Kai-shek is the one mainland China wants to stay in power in Taiwan, to keep the 70-year old status quo. The Taiwan issue has flared because the Kuomintang lost the last election.

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,685 total)