Thomas_More

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,706 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243191
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Thank you, but i’m housebound.

    Horrifically, I did in fact desert to the King’s side, from Devereux’s regiment to Sir Bevill Grenvile’s! (Oh, horror!)

    Yes, I had a pash for the three pretty sisters who ran the royalist regt, and preferred being with them to being with beer-bellied middle-aged roundheads.

    Not all bad news though. At least I signed up for the rebel side in the 1985 Monmouth re-enactment, and got kicked in the groin by a royalist colonel on Glastonbury Tor.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243189
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Next you’ll say Alexandre Dumas was a reactionary for making his musketeers try to save Charles I. in Thirty Years After.
    An admirable novel. You’d do well to read it, to give you some “pluck” and buckle your swash a little.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243188
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    No I do not. But if it gives you pleasure to say so, so be it.

    The overthrow of Charles I. was an essential stage in the English bourgeois revolution. There, I said it, and I acknowledge it.
    I still like him for his pluck, and I still oppose his execution.
    There! 🙂

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243178
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Who then grew up and became a sound and coherent materialist thinker and writer.

    Are Socialists Sadists?

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243175
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Weren’t the Highland Clearances and the various indigenous genocides around the world also progressive in marxian terms? Does that mean I should support them?

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243174
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I do like the first for certain things. He was a thorn in the side of the bourgeoisie. He stopped enclosures. He stopped witch-hunts.
    I never read of the parliamentary side stopping witch-hunters. In fact Hopkins flourished with roundhead protection, and had to flee when the King’s forces gained ground.
    I do commend Cromwell for outlawing bear and bull-baiting, but I suspect it was more on religious grounds than anything else.
    Rather than the forerunners of socialism using the revolution, wasn’t it more the revolution using them? And then packing them off to kill Irish people?
    I like to think I would have kept my head down, and therefore on, whereas you would have either been hanged by Cromwellians, or hanged, drawn and quartered by Charles II for signing the death warrant.
    Coppe kept his head down, and on.
    I like him too.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243169
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I avoided the whole thing. I watched My Family on W, and Not Going Out on Dave.

    Have a look at the Spike Milligan skit above. It’ll cheer you up.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243165
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    My opposition to executions is not dependent on culpability or innocence, nor does it denote support for the executed.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243164
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    It’s because his father was executed that Charles II sought vengeance!

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243157
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I’m not going to support the execution of Charles I, nor am I going to support the hanging of the Levellers.
    I shall oppose the death penalty under all circumstances and shall remain consistent in that, just like the man I admire most in history, the Marquis de Sade – observing the follies of men but remaining guiltless of any participation in their crimes.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243151
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    ” Next you’ll be telling us that James II was a good bloke too.”

    ———

    Next you’ll be saying Matthew Hopkins was a good bloke. Only the retreat of Roundhead forces put an end to his crimes.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243146
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Like Tom Paine, i’m against the death penalty, even for kings.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243145
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Tell it to the Levellers murdered by Cromwell.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243141
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I put this on the off-topic thread, but it seems also apt to post here:

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243140
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    “Stunning observation, TM 🙂”

    Gramercy, madame.

Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,706 total)