Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Thomas_MoreParticipant
Leave comments please, to this:
Thomas_MoreParticipantGibbon on Christianity.
In his monumental work, Edward Gibbon, in his chapters on Christianity, has to pay lip-service to the “truth” of the mythology, yet his brilliant sarcasm throughout, but thinly veiled, makes reading him a real pleasure.
Thomas_MoreParticipantTribal people are shown Carl Sagan video.
And yet in the US and UK, where we have all this technology, we are plagued with oafs!
- This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by Thomas_More.
Thomas_MoreParticipantNo, it isn’t idealist.
Thomas_MoreParticipantI know. Tell it them then.
I wrote to Carl Sagan in 1988 about socialism. He didn’t reply, but I wrote, and I think it’s important to do so.
And what Dawkins should be looking at, rather than at the stupidity of creationists, is WHY are people still choosing such paths.
Thomas_MoreParticipantYes. I have left a comment on that.
Party members should leave comments. Even if Dawkins doesn’t see them, others watching the video(s) will.Thomas_MoreParticipantSome very funny bits in here:
Thomas_MoreParticipantA ruba’i (plural: rubaiyat)
He was a poet who didn’t know it,
A materialist not quite with it,
Reliant on the old rather than new,
and to some an argumentative git.- This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by Thomas_More.
Thomas_MoreParticipant“the idea that the senses provide us with direct awareness of objects as they really are”).
I never said that and I would be wrong if I did.
” I just thought you might be in view of your seeming rejection of any active role for the mind in understanding the world of reality.”
I would be wrong to do that too.
“Pannekoek understood material reality to be a ‘continuous and unbounded stream in perpetual motion’”.
Something I have always said too. Even Taoism says that.
Good ol’ Heraclitus. He is right.
Marx too much for me? Rude!
Well, I’ll be an Heraclitan, thank you.
- This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by Thomas_More.
Thomas_MoreParticipantThat is correct about maps. That at last puts it succinctly.
Thomas_MoreParticipantThank you. I’ll be reading this too. Looks very interesting.
Thomas_MoreParticipantI will read this, but I just wonder if many of you are so engrossed in Marx that you confuse that with everything, even the natural sciences like astronomy.
Atoms exist, even if the word atom is invented by humans to assist understanding and converse.
Why am I a “naive realist”?
I’m a party member, aren’t I?
I just don’t put Marx into everything.
(I wondered the other day what a suspicious character who resembled him in my Asterix book was up to).What’s next? “A Marxian Analysis of the Planets”?
- This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by Thomas_More.
Thomas_MoreParticipantI only proffered the quote to elicit a discussion.
Thomas_MoreParticipant
Richard Dawkins/Mitchell & Webb.Thomas_MoreParticipantYou are starting to sound more and more like an idealist.
Are you denying material, physical reality, and saying it’s all in our minds?
- This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by Thomas_More.
-
AuthorPosts