Thomas_More

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,685 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New book on co-operation vs competition. #254629
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Agreed, but I would have to buy the book, and I am on benefits.

    in reply to: Pumping us with weight-loss drugs. #254624
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    More guilt-tripping of unemployed wage-slaves; and the danger of being forced to take dangerous drugs, when all genuine physicians tell us diet and exercise are the only safe options for weight-loss, not pills.

    in reply to: What are we talking about #254583
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Even when I mention things in passing, whilst having a normal small talk conversation, I am rendered speechless. For instance, the news that dinosaurs did not co-exist with humans has people reply, “Are you sure? How do you know that?”

    And I constantly have to dumb down my vocabulary.
    I also hate snobbery, and it comes because, as I am not an academic, I am asked “How would YOU know? You’re not a professor.”

    I’ve had doors closed on me whilst a friend was allowed through, because she had an academic title and I’m just a bum.

    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: What are we talking about #254579
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I’ve been ridiculed as a book reader all my life, long before the internet. Book readers for pleasure are not valued, especially not when they are male.

    And you can bet those dismissing books in favour of the digital are NOT, for the most part, going online to read Marx and Engels. Nor to read anything of substance.

    Money-making, gambling, porn, zombie games, jobs and sport are about all, plus conspiracies (for those of that bent).

    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: What are we talking about #254572
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Very few are researching historical materialism. Many more than that are researching flat earth, or Taylor Swift.

    Btw, do you see socialism as a bookless society, like in H.G. Wells’ Time Machine, where former libraries are full of dust, and books crumble like cookies when touched?

    We can hardly hope Shelley’s knowledgeable, well-read, coherent, eloquent and enlightened “rising lions” are still to be found anywhere, as we once hopefully saw heroic proletarians abolishing the wages system. That’s a Godwinian and Marxian fiction, you have to admit. And Rosa Luxemburg is long gone.

    The vocabulary of Marxism, or any extensive vocabulary, has no place in most people’s lives, and they have no interest in it.

    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 3 weeks, 6 days ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: What are we talking about #254562
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    The workers are not going to make the revolution through any understanding of historical materialism. Only a tiny minority know what that is, and I am mocked for my pleas on the importance of books and knowledge of history, and am told by socialists we don’t need people to read in order for them to make socialism. If that is so, we must hope for them to make it without any historical understanding of their role; just make it intuitively, out of the self-preservation instinct.

    in reply to: Japan #254488
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Death by work.

    in reply to: Japan #254487
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Workers harrassed.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #254482
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Point taken.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #254478
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c625p2wy3q7o.amp
    This could drag in more countries.

    in reply to: Japan #254469
    Thomas_More
    Participant
    in reply to: Wage-slave self-deception. #254454
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    It wasn’t Woolworth’s.
    I won’t name it.

    I did have a Xmas job in Woolworth’s in 1993.

    I was on the till, age 33, and the 21 yr old manager was supervising me, when a little old lady spoke to him and pointed at me:

    “It’s good to see the young ‘uns getting a proper start in life.”

    Woolworth’s had the habit of frisking all staff about to clock off early, in front of customers.

    An amusing true story. I worked in Debenhams in the 1980s, where a Mr. Mackay-like security guard gave us all the once-over at the end of the day.
    Years later I bumped into him (he was a customer, like me), in a CD shop. He shouted, with everyone turning to look at me: “STILL ON THE STRAIGHT AND NARROW?”
    As I was leaving the shop, he boomed again, with everyone turning: “KEEP YOUR NOSE CLEAN!”

    in reply to: Wage-slave self-deception. #254448
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    As part of the induction process to working in a department store a few years ago, I sat with young wage-slave hopefuls at a large table facing the managers. When it came time for a trade union rep to talk to us, we were told in advance that we don’t have to listen to him. While the young people (all avid fans of Love Island etc.) sat with heads bowed in silence and stayed silent when he asked for questions, I engaged with him, while the managers glared at me.
    Back at the jobcentre I was summoned to a private office and told “You’re a troublemaker, aren’t you?”

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #254446
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    A superb and accurate analysis.

    Plus, I don’t think the US could stomach Putin’s forestalling and quashing Obama’s planned and readied invasion of Syria, aimed at dethroning Assad, whom Putin saved.

    in reply to: Wage-slave self-deception. #254445
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    No I didn’t. Google banker. It is now the term also for a bank clerk, and they all call themselves bankers.

    In the days of Chaplin workers knew they were workers. They may have sheepishly followed warmongers and idolised monarchs, but they knew they were working class.
    The workers were the good guys in movies. The underdog was championed.
    Now, the underdog is a criminal whom the heroic cops deal with, and the regular fare for workers are “reality” shows and idolisation of the parasitic super-rich.
    Now, if you tell someone they are working class, or tell a bank clerk he isn’t a banker, you’ll be shunned.
    Just like telling someone the biological fact that they are an animal!

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,685 total)