Szaviels
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yet they corrode into such. With people taking opportunity in wake of the ability to gain some form of power. Yes, there have been nonviolent revolutions, but, with the way the world is today, I cannot see one succeeding.
Marxism at its core remove class boundaries, and at the start of the movements in China, Korea and Russia, they did that, and could well have made a system that stood true and stood firm, free of contestation. Opportunists, Such as the mentioned Mao, Kim Il-Sung and Lenin manipulated the ideal of equality and socialism to create a hysteria, a way of controling the people into surrendering the freedoms they had just fought to secure. Filling the minds of the people with propaganda and lies. The Russian Revolution is perhaps the most accurate way of showing how it started with Marxism but warped into something else entirely. It started with the driving force of a class struggle, yet devolving into something of the same ilk, creating a new class, the political dictatorial class under Stalin (Earlier Lenin). The use of the word "Utopian" is merelyu my opinion, however I shall explain as you were good enough to inquire. A society that have no class coundaries where everone has the same opportunities be they rich or poor, is to me, beautiful, as opposed to the ugliness of the capitalist aristocracy of current.
Revolution represents rapid change, I have said many times online and offline on differing forums and to associates that revolutions, although sometimes needed (and sometimes agrivated by opportunists) are rapid, and change when forced like a revolutionary change leaves little room for correction, it can leave a resonant scar for years and years, We still feel the scars of the second world war, the French and Russian Revolution's brutality. A revolution is foolish, unless there is no other choice. On the other hand, a gradual, monitored and planned change would work better, we organise, remove the stigma around socialism, grow as a group and unite with others to form a sword and shield, the sword to smite the enemies of the people (not physically, more in the sense of removing corruption from goverment) and the shield to protect. Once we are strong enough, which together, nothing is impossible, imagine what we could do if funds going towards politicians were rerouted to medical, scientific and social research, our technology and understanding would skyrocket.
