Jordan Levi

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 67 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Dark Future of the USA #230897
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    agreed that Hedges may use the term “fascism” too loosely, but there’s definitely a historical precedent to evidence the fact that liberals will ally with genuine fascists in a heartbeat to stomp out more radical elements than them.

    in reply to: Protest in Ecuador #230896
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    damn, i had no clue about this, solidarity with them! also, what do you think of colombia’s new president, marcos?

    in reply to: Summer School #230895
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    all these talks sound great, mike! will they be livestreamed on the discord server?

    in reply to: ICC on Ukraine #230894
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    aj, i’ll be asleep for the saturday one and i have a book club meeting on sunday at 7 PM UK time, but i can hop in for the first couple hours of that one at least. thanks for the info!

    in reply to: Making short videoes #230893
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    not bad, AJ!

    in reply to: ‘The ideological foundations of Critical Race Theory’ #221689
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    good article. i haven’t read enough about CRT yet, but it does seem incompatible with marxism on a surface level. what sucks is that all the “marxists” with the biggest platforms seem to be gung-ho. it’s hard enough explaining to someone that AOC and I agree on very little without also having to explain why many of her positions are the complete opposite of Marxist

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #217282
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    dawkins is a coward. he asked a very reasonable question that every sane person asks when confronted with this group’s logic: if not anyone can identify as black (rachel dolezal, for example, was villified), then why can anyone identify as a woman? not a single solitary person answered his question soundly. this is a question i’ve asked numerous times and have never gotten a reasonable answer, either. all they say is “it’s different,” then call you a transphobe. and that’s how you know it’s not based on any sound logic. he’s a coward for backing down.

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #217049
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    AJ, extra “genders” have always been reserved for gender nonconforming or homosexual men and women. i hate when people bring this up, cuz it shows a blatant misunderstanding of how homophobic these societies are. but these people are never considered a separate sex regardless, every society’s recognized there’s only 2

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #217048
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    i kept procrastinating on posting in here that i dropped part 1 of that essay a couple weeks ago

    Gender ideology – a summing up part 1

    also, somebody sent me that book in a group chat, ALB. i might have to buy it just to review it. they have a chapter on judith butler’s “science” lmaooo!

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #215967
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    KAZ, there’s no way to take a neutral stance on accepting reality. you either do or don’t. these people think gender roles didn’t exist in indigenous societies before they were colonized. they think homo and heterosexuality is based on gender identity, which they can’t even prove exists. they think there are more than 2 sexes, even tho they can’t point out even a 3rd gamete. literally all their ideas are based on obfuscation.

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #215966
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    P. Abelard, OMG that clip was great! XDDD also, if both of those blatant men decided to say they identify as women, they would then be considered pre-op trans women by the woke crowd and be considered a lesbian couple. no bullshit.

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #215965
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    KAZ, i think censi will always be important

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #215964
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    ALB, yeah, the ONS instead went with filling in sex, plus whether you’re transgender and, if so, your gender identity. what’s so mf crazy and gives up the whole charade is that so many people were still mad about this and are telling “trans women” to just put themselves as women, without the transgender designation. that’s so utterly mf backwards, cuz accurate numbers could give transgender clinics more funding. they’re more focused on arbitrary “validation” than accurate data.

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #215963
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    rob, almost every “trans woman” on twitter would disagree with that statement, call you a transphobe, say there’s no such thing as a man’s or woman’s body, then tell you to suck their “lady dick.” also, that study’s equating sex characteristics with sex itself. someone’s sex is based off which reproductive path one went down after gonadal differentiation. that is the singular determinant of sex. certain structures only develop in one of the 2 directions. LMAOOOOOO! THEY QUOTE ANNE-FAUSTO STERLING TO BOLSTER THEIR POINT! SHE LITERALLY ALREADY ADMITTED SHE WAS TROLLING WHEN SHE WROTE “THE 5 SEXES”! XDDDDDD

    also, rob, Zach Elliot already ripped that article to shreds lol

    and it’s not a generalization to say there are only two sexes. sexes are reproductive roles. there are only 2 gametes, and thus only 2 reproductive roles. TRAs like to bring up mushrooms here., but mushrooms don’t have sexes, they have mating types. even when species are hermaphroditic, there are still only 2 sexes lumped together in their reproductive system. there is no 3rd sex anywhere in reality. therefore, sex is binary. sex characteristics exist on a spectrum, but not sex itself. also, that suicide rate is complete bullshit

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #215962
    Jordan Levi
    Participant

    AJ, there should be LGBT wings in men’s prisons to prevent transgender males from being raped. to send them to women’s prisons after so many women have been raped that way is unacceptable. it just happened again in washington recently.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 67 total)