rodshaw

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 440 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Thomas More and Abolition of Money #109204
    rodshaw
    Participant

    It depends greatly on whose version of history you like, but, Utopia apart, wasn't More just an arch-conservative who felt insecure about the changes afoot? Principled he might have been, but he was, after all, responsible for a fair number of torturings of those nasty heretics.The fictionalised Mantel view is poles apart from the fictionalised Robert Bolt view. How close can we get to the 'true' view, if there is one?

    in reply to: The Great problem with Socialism #109108
    rodshaw
    Participant

    Altruism comes from the Latin alter, meaning other. Its has nothing to do with elevation.

    in reply to: BBC Program on the History of Democracy #109056
    rodshaw
    Participant

    They are having a 'democracy season' at present. How important Magna Carta was, etc. David Starkey interviewed a couple of people who said that our democratic rights won since Magna Carta are being eroded by the laws against terrorism. Then Starkey made some comment to the effect that our liberties need restricting when it comes to maintaining order.That's probably about as democratic as the BBC will get.Ho-hum.

    in reply to: Whoo-hooo Scottish tea! #109132
    rodshaw
    Participant

    Socialism or not, just don't smoke near me.

    in reply to: Bob Dylan has a solution for unemployment #108856
    rodshaw
    Participant
    SocialistPunk wrote:
    But another song I like by Black Sabbath is more appropriate  to us lot, and the last line in the second verse sums up Dylan fairly well. But I guess Dylan is all grown-up and has left the politics of idealistic youth behind and focuses on the practicalities of the real world.

     That's a common problem – so many of these types "mellow with age" and see revolution or even protest against the status quo as the preserve of rebellious youth. When will they ever learn?

    in reply to: Movies they should have made #107915
    rodshaw
    Participant
    Ozymandias wrote:
    rodshaw wrote:
    Any film that acknowledges the distinction between proper socialism and what we are generally told is socialism/communism, and can present socialism clearly and convincingly as highly desirable. Not in some sci-fi film set in the distant future, but in a realistic fiction set in the present. In short, a film that makes people say, "We can have that now and we want it!"

    But we are never going to see a film like that are we? You can sneer all you want smart arse.

    I beg your pardon? Who are you directing your smart arse comment to?

    in reply to: History #108798
    rodshaw
    Participant

    As socialists we have little time for the Great Man Theory of History but have there been any truly great men or women? If so, what defines greatness, and what makes some people stand out? Or is greatness simply not in our vocabulary?

    in reply to: Movies they should have made #107912
    rodshaw
    Participant

    Any film that acknowledges the distinction between proper socialism and what we are generally told is socialism/communism, and can present socialism clearly and convincingly as highly desirable. Not in some sci-fi film set in the distant future, but in a realistic fiction set in the present. In short, a film that makes people say, "We can have that now and we want it!"

    in reply to: Marx’s Scientific Method #107920
    rodshaw
    Participant

    SardaI quite agree. We in the Socialist Party say that socialism is intelligible to the vast majority – otherwise there'd be no point advocating it – so I think postings like #1 have to be taken for what they are – to be discussed by those who enjoy discussing such things (not me), and not to be thought of as essential reading for all.

    in reply to: To the Patriotic Socialist Party. #107491
    rodshaw
    Participant

    On the bright side, a recent survey has revealed that only 1 in 4 people in Britain would be prepared to go to war for 'their' country. A university professor of war studies thinks this is largely to do with people being less willing to trust authority and what their governments tell them.A step in the right direction, at least, though the global average of people who'd be willing to go to war is apparently 60 percent.

    in reply to: Can the workers ever be wrong? #105554
    rodshaw
    Participant

    Someone I argued with (a normal working class chap) told me that not only did he not agree with my idea of socialism, but he would actively oppose such a society being established.I think that most people who have heard the case for socialism and rejected it (and I'm not convinced there are that many) are doing so because they know their world view belongs to the majority and they don't really think there's any chance of it happening. Or if they do, they see it as a threat to their lifestyles. If socialism were to gain significantly more support (presumably from people other than the type described) their views would start to change too.

    in reply to: Is this photo an insult to the working class? #98328
    rodshaw
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
    This is what we mean when we use the term, but are we sure it is what most of those who read or hear us understand us to mean?

    Most definitely not. We are at odds with the vast majority in our interpretation of the term 'working class'. Most people don't see the world as simply divided into working class and capitalist. They see things as being far more complicated than that, with at least three classes and various shades of grey in between, because they don't get the essential political distinction.So unless we always qualify the term whenever we use it, people will mostly misunderstand what we mean. Not their fault, really.Maybe we should switch to using 'producer' and 'parasite' instead.

    in reply to: Brand and Paxman #97356
    rodshaw
    Participant

    He's certainly hit a nerve with the braying horses of the establishment. He's getting revolution talked about, and good for him.Imagine the vitriol that would be hurled at the WSM by the mainstream press if we got as much publicity as Brand is getting. I wish.

    in reply to: Wikipedia #105809
    rodshaw
    Participant

    “every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge”“What is remarkable is that these principles have underwritten the collaboration of tens of thousands of people across the world in the production of a massive global resource. Wikipedia shows that productive non-market egalitarian collaboration on a very wide scale is possible.”Have we approached them and asked what they think about extending this to apply to all the world's resources, not just knowledge? We may have a few allies there.Their own article on censorship is also interesting, if not surprising. It doesn't mention them being censored in the US but I bet they are watched pretty closely from certain quarters.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_Wikipedia

    in reply to: Remembrance Day Song #105700
    rodshaw
    Participant

    It's well and good to remember the horrors of war and the people who die so needlessly in them. But the underlying message of all this poppy stuff, and the TV programmes about WWI, is that it's a necessity and an honour to fight and die for your country. And then of course there's all the puke-inducing religious stuff that goes with it.Refuse to have anything to do with it and people think you're churlish or mad.Not forgetting having Children In Need rammed down your throat as well…the BBC are really milking it this time of year.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 440 total)