PartisanZ
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
For him the mutual interdependence of man and nature was what was essential and anything else seemed unreal.
The part I emphasised is crucial,in my view.
You still do not answer the question.
Answer Robbo’s very simple straight forward question and point.
Now deal with the arguments that demolish your crackpot non-Marxian idea about the need for scientific theories to be democratically voted upon by the global population.
This article was submitted to multiple “progressive” publications touting a principled commitment to freedom of speech. It was rejected by all of them.
Not submitted to us surely?
What actually Happened in Bristol – and How a Narrative is Built
Yes, thanks for this link.
I got a similar story about the arrival of the riot cops and setting of the dogs as the spark.
You and your elite with a special consciousness are keeping hold of the social production of truth, aren’t you?
What damned elite? You are havering. You seem to be the one with a special consciousness of minority led Leninist debacles, are needing to,lay out procedures for the revolutionaries to follow.
We say the ones who make the revolution, the immense majority who make the revolution will make it work.
In an advanced , post-capitalist society, run by us all, locally, regionally, globally, in democratic administration over resources and not a government over people.
Answer this..
I found that even with school uniform differences was noticeable. Blazers, grey trousers, the shirts, the shoes, the schoolbags were all discernable in quality and price paid for them. People knew who came from families with money.
Yes I ended up in the last years with an old British Rail jacket as a substitute for my blazer and I was happy to do so to save my mum getting into debt at a ‘tick’ warehouse.
It was actually more robust, warmer and better than the shoddy real thing.
My problem with the uniform was being identified as a Catholic when venturing outwith safer precincts.
Where anywhere does Marx say we will be voting on the ‘truth’.
So he does not and you’ve been spouting mince.
And why are you so opposed to them being socially produced by democratic methods?
The phsysicians and specialists are and will be part of the masses.
So, certainly not so. As previously indicated several times.
The people who make the revolution, will set the determinations.An advanced , post-capitalist society, run by us all, locally, regionally, globally, in democratic administration over resources and not a government over people.
I am just opposed to the stupidity of your claim.
Answer this..
Do you trust intelligence sources, after all, it is all about deceiving.
https://apnews.com/article/national-security-iran-only-on-ap-army-1285df40348182e1b74dc403607c5928
Iranian Revolutionary Guards were intending to stage an attack on a Washington DC army base and also plotted to assassinate a US general.
No of course not, but I could understand them wanting to get revenge for the scientists and others who had been taken out by US /Israeli ops.
Where anywhere does Marx say we will be voting on the ‘truth’ of scientific theories.
Answer this..Here is a partisan view of the recent US -China meeting.
(Below from An A to Z of Marxism #M )
The Socialist Party has made its own contributions to socialist theory whilst combating distortions of Marx’s ideas. In the light of all the above, the three main Marxist theories can be restated as:
The political theory of class struggle
The materialist theory of history
The labour theory of valueThese are tools of analysis, which have been further developed and modified by socialists, to explain how the working class are exploited under capitalism. Marxism is not only a method for criticising capitalism: it also points to the alternative. Marxism explains the importance to the working class of common ownership, democratic control and production solely for use and the means for establishing it.
And while it is desirable that socialist activists should acquaint themselves with the basics of Marxism, it is essential that a majority of workers have a working knowledge of how capitalism operates and what the change to socialism will mean.
Surely it’s obvious by now, robbo, that I want to engage with the question of by who and how are the practical limits set, which will then lead to what they are
You have already been given this several times.
The people who make the revolution, will set determinations.
An advanced , post-capitalist society, run by us all, locally, regionally, globally, in democratic administration over resources and not a government over people.
It will be a market -free, money -free, production for use (not for sale), free access (not rationed access) commonly owned,(not private, corporate or state owned) revolutionary permanent break with the present capitalist one.
It has never existed anywhere.
It is not a ‘reformist’ nor a ‘statist’ version of capitalism which retains wage slavery in any form.
It will be the mature, politically conscious task of the immense majority to make it happen and not the minority vanguardist led actions of pseudo-revolutionaries.
“The organising tenet will be from each according to their abilities, to each according to their needs.”
You have not answered Robbo’s question.
