PartisanZ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 769 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: More on Brexit #226728
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    It is just ore nationalist huffery puffery. The Tories priorities are to be the government at any cost.

    Jeez! They even sold out business.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226714
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    It’s fascinatingly stuff apart from the UK idiots.

    in reply to: Left and Right Unite! – For the UBI Fight! #226635
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    I was really pleasedfor them. I thought it looked pretty good for the category, it was helping.

    They, or some of them, will still need the help of ‘wiser’ counsel given their special circumstances.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226512
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    “But the wheel’s still in spin and there’s no telling who that’s naming”. (Dylan)

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/15/duma-manouevre-points-to-kremlin-impatience-in-ukraine-standoff?fbclid=IwAR2jRQLJMWBFAn1pNAMcHwocHCoIApJYombcTQtwbA1eyMS0L1rnRKaFWzc

    It is as yet, unfinished business, he is keeping all on tiptoes.

    He’s wrestling NATO’s fingers away from his throat. A defensive measure it could be seen as, however strong the smell of war.

    It’s no’like they have ever been invaded before is it?

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 9 months ago by PartisanZ.
    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226459
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    Did they say 6 am?

    So I can have a coffee and watch Everybody Loves Raymond first, to settle me before switching on the news.

    Look out the window first, to see if everyone has been fried.

    If you expect ‘credible reports’ from the Mail, Jeez

    “De omnibus dubitandum” [doubt everything] Marx.

    Also by Søren Kierkegaard
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_omnibus_dubitandum_est

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 9 months ago by PartisanZ.
    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226385
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    What’s the problem?
    It’s just everyday diplomatic negotiations between two rival power blocs, NATO and Russo-Chinese

    Whats the purpose?
    Whatever they can get.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226380
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    What’s the problem?
    It’s just everyday diplomatic negotiations between two rival power blocs, NATO and Russo-Chinese

    Whats the purpose?
    Whatever they can get.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226270
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    It is not presently on the cards. It just that some of your sources for the negatives, are Establishment ones.’The Daily Mail’,for Pete’s sake.
    Do not give any credence to any of,’em
    Even ‘altnatives’.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226268
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    Perhaps an invasion would be the only way of removing the danger of Ukraine joining NATO.

    Danger to whom?

    You are a one trick pony seeming to advertise a war scenario above all else.

    They’ll bumble through this crisis, shouting ‘Boo’ and sow the seeds of the next one, if every one is not satisfied.

    Either way, we in the WSM, will not be taking sides with any of them.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226245
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    Much more like I’d buy AlJazeera’s take long before The Mail or any of them.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #226182
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    Oh hardly. NATO was warned ages ago after the breakdown of the Warsaw Pact countries alliances,about expanding their territory and chose to ignore the warnings of their diplomats and commanders and government others.

    in reply to: The Dark Future of the USA #226149
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Transforming_Labor_Based_Parties_in_Lati.html?id=aeXD9F8OkFoC&source=kp_cover&redir_esc=y

    He can sound a bit ‘nutty’ himelf to my ears.

    This book seeks to explain why some contemporary Latin American labor-based parties adapted successfully to the challenges of neoliberalism and working class decline. It argues that loosely structured party organizations tend to be more flexible… Google Books

    May the blurb doesn’t explain adequately.
    working class decline.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 9 months ago by PartisanZ.
    in reply to: Scotland’s free buses #226066
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    It is a useful reform measure for huge section of a huge section of the general public, who don’t have access to cars or the cash to get about.

    It covers the whole country,so provide you are able bodied enough you can have a wee party to yourself.They docate fro disaled passemges also.

    A great public service methinks, as as I managed to terrify relatives who thought they’d seen the last of me.😡

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 9 months ago by PartisanZ.
    in reply to: Status differentiation in a socialist society #225713
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    I hope the above isn’t directed at BD’s last post as I found it very amusing. We need more humour in the ‘Party

    It is directed at everyone.

    in reply to: Status differentiation in a socialist society #225710
    PartisanZ
    Participant

    Forum rules
    Your use of the forums indicates your agreement to abide by these rules, to abide by the decisions of the moderators in interpreting and enforcing these rules.

    1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.

    2. The forums proper are intended for public discussion. Personal messages between participants should be sent via private message or by e-mail.

    3. Do not use the forums to send spam, advertisements, charitable appeals, solicitations, or other messages primarily intended to promote a particular product, service, campaign, website, organisation, venture, or event, unless it is relevant to the SPGB or its companion parties, without first obtaining permission from the moderators.

    4. Do not use the forum to send any material that you know or should know would expose the SPGB to criminal or civil liability. This includes but is not limited to material which constitutes libel, harassment, or violation of copyright. You may, of course, quote portions of third-party publications for ‘fair dealing’ purposes such as criticism or review.

    5. Do not use the forum to send any material or links to material that you know or should know contains or exposes readers to malware, computer viruses, trojans, and so forth.

    6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).

    7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

    8. Do not register or operate more than one account without first obtaining permission from the moderators. Do not share your password with others or allow anyone else to use your account. Do not use your account to post messages on behalf of any suspended user, without prior permission from the moderators.

    9. Do not vandalise or tamper with the forums in order to deface them, to impersonate or deny access to others, or to evade the enforcement of these rules.

    10. You retain the copyright to the original material you post. By posting on these forums you grant the SPGB and its successors and assigns a non-exclusive irrevocable right to publish your posting in any manner it or they see fit without notice or compensation to you.

    11. Do not abuse the report function. Only highlight posts that genuinely require moderator attention.

    12. Moderators may move, remove, or lock any threads or posts which they deem to be off-topic or in violation of the rules. Because posts and threads can be deleted without advance notice, it is your responsibility to make copies of threads and posts which are important to you.

    13. Moderators may temporarily or permanently suspend posting and private messaging privileges for posters they deem to be in violation of the rules.

    14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.

    15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 10 months ago by PartisanZ.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 769 total)