Ozymandias

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 332 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russell Brand #107632
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    Pathetic. Couldn't watch any more of it. Just a celebrity in awe of another celebrity. 

    in reply to: Russell Brand #107624
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    Surely here he was referring to Russia etc. His remark about Christianity is dodgy as fuck though. 

    in reply to: Russell Brand #107619
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    Ach well. It was just a thought. I know Brand is basically a reformist and his meeting with Miliband is proof positive. Brand never goes far enough and from what I've read it looks as if Miliband swayed him. Fuckin hell! I guess the whole world and his dog will be sniffing about to get on his show. I just don't know how the party will ever get out of its quagmire of obscurity. It's a fuckin shame.

    in reply to: Russell Brand #107614
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    Couldn't the party get an interview on "The Trews"?

    in reply to: Brand and Paxman #97382
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    Well I might have set the ball rolling with the Kliman thing. In a similar vein wouldn't it be an idea to do a video of a party member being interview by this taxi driver guy in his cab?. Could you contact him and angle it as opportunity to give him the party case as well as an opportunity to speak about real democracy and  comment about the farce of the election. I watched him interviewing Brand and both of them seem desperate for answers. 

    in reply to: Critisticuffs seminar on elections #110443
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    Who are these Cristicuffs guys? Are they like Anti Capitalists or TZM minded? 

    in reply to: Communications technology and human behaviour #110414
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    Recently some poor guy in Telford succeeded in throwing himself to his death because of the encouraging shouts of "Jump", "Get on with it" and "How far can you bounce?" from a crowd of "Workers" below him. Some of these fuckin cretins were filming this horror on their smartphones then uploading it onto "social media" for a laugh. This isn't the first time this kind of thing has happened. Well the smartphone phenomenon is making our glorious "working class" anything but smart. Let's face it they were a shower of stupid bastards before all of this…now made even more stupid with the emergence of this technology. They are more addicted, more myopic, more desensitised and more detached as a consequence. This is what you are dealing with now. The masters are turning them all into DRONES! You only have to look at the kids. World Socialism? That'll be right…FORGET IT! 

    in reply to: Movies they should have made #107916
    Ozymandias
    Participant

     Uch ah wiz only kiddin ye on ya bam!

    in reply to: Movies they should have made #107913
    Ozymandias
    Participant
    rodshaw wrote:
    Any film that acknowledges the distinction between proper socialism and what we are generally told is socialism/communism, and can present socialism clearly and convincingly as highly desirable. Not in some sci-fi film set in the distant future, but in a realistic fiction set in the present. In short, a film that makes people say, "We can have that now and we want it!"

    But we are never going to see a film like that are we? You can sneer all you want smart arse. As it happens I watched "Snowpiercer" the other day and I thought it was excellent. I recommend it to any party member. I can understand why the Capitalist Harvey Weinstein demanded 20 minutes of cuts then strangled any general release of this movie. It is too thought provoking and incendiary. The train as depicted in the film is obviously an allegory of Capitalism. Maybe workers would relate to a movie set in the future. Sadly the prospect of the 99% ever waking up in our lifetimes is truly the stuff of Science Fiction fantasy.

    in reply to: Movies they should have made #107910
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    A couple of years ago a Sci Fi movie by the name of "Snowpiercer" was made but it failed to get any kind of general release despite it's starry cast. It concerns the class struggle on board a futuristic nuclear train. I have an illegal download copy on DVD which I haven't watched yet. I guess it might come to the same lame conclusions as "Elysium" which was released a couple of years ago. 

    in reply to: Does Parliament matter #105250
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    I share your sense of foreboding Socialist Punk. A great many of these "squaddies" are impoverished dullards who have already been brutalised in childhood even before they start learning how to be killers. This article exposes what happens to these murderers when they come back home. Apart from the deeply entrenched ultra nationalism inherent in military culture the fact is that we as depending on these people to join the class war when a large proportion of them are fucking psycho's whether Sergeant Major, lowly private or Brigadier General. And the global arsenal they've got behind them! It's terrifying. I think a bloodless revolution would be a total miracle. It could end up being a very dangerous situation indeed…if we ever actually get there of course. Fuck I'm being a pessimist again. Canny help it. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/oct/18/collateral-damage-ex-soldiers-living-with-ptsdI just hope this link works. Can't seem to cut and paste properly for this forum from my iPhone.

    in reply to: Russell Brand new book: Revolution #104954
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    If this review is anything to go by then it looks as if Brand's new book is going to be mostly a lot of mixed up irrelevant shite. Apparently Brand's revolutionary ethos stems from the 12 Steps of the AA cult! I've got a ticket for his Guardian Live event for next Thursday but I'm preparing to be disappointed. That same sinking feeling when I watched Naomi Klein totally missing the point at her own Guardian Live event. I get the feeling that even if Brand read a Standard, the case would either go over his head or he would repudiate it on grounds of it being outdated or something. I guess he has opened up the debate about revolution but for all of his flowery verbiage the guy is politically inarticulate. How could he not be I guess? At least the guy is trying I suppose. Christ I sound so patronising! What the fuck do I know? Haha http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/oct/17/revolution-russell-brand-review-political-manifesto

    in reply to: It’s just all about me me me! #105331
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    I'm sorry but I just had to remove most of that last post. Cannot believe what I'd written. Talk about compulsive disclosure! What is wrong with me. Sorry folks! 

    in reply to: Piketty’s data #101956
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    I doubt Zizek would pass the knowledge test what with all his rambling I've just read from the GuardIan Webchat. He pisses me off as much as Naomi Klein, Michael Moore, David Harvey, Richard D Wolff, Chomsky, Peter Joseph and all the rest of them. By contrast I recently watched Richard Headicar's devastating talk on how Labour came to gift us the Atom bomb. This guy could blow any of these muddled charlatans out of the water. Philosophers my arse. 

    in reply to: Monbiot #105052
    Ozymandias
    Participant

    Pasted not payed damn it!

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 332 total)