mullrae

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Liverpool fans booing the anthem #243184
    mullrae
    Participant

    Can anyone remember this anthem being booed before.

    in reply to: 2nd oldest political party #233555
    mullrae
    Participant

    Workers of the world, surely.

    in reply to: 2nd oldest political party #233553
    mullrae
    Participant

    Well socialism isn’t just about you.

    in reply to: 2nd oldest political party #233507
    mullrae
    Participant

    I think people are missing the point, the point is if we claim to be the second oldest political party in the UK, then we have to be able to back that claim up, otherwise we are no better than any other political party.

    in reply to: 2nd oldest political party #233504
    mullrae
    Participant

    So as far as you are concerned the labour party didn’t exist in 1900, it was a committee and not a party as such.

    in reply to: Capital vol 1 #204936
    mullrae
    Participant

    The conclusion is that capitalism is an incredibly wasteful society and as Marx/Engels and others pointed out needs abolishing and replaceing  with a saner society of production for use without the need of coins , bills of payment and paper/plastic notes .

    in reply to: Capital vol 1 #204931
    mullrae
    Participant

    I didn’t say that the banks control the system and banks as you pointed out flout the rules , they go bust , overlend and like any other business in capitalism will make use of any means that they think will bring in more money , and as you point out react to the market and not control it .

     

    in reply to: Capital vol 1 #204913
    mullrae
    Participant

    To me at least what his quote says is , the bankers were using notes to gain more control over the financial sector .

     

    in reply to: Capital vol 1 #204905
    mullrae
    Participant

    I understand what has been written , but if it makes no difference if sovereigns are put into circulation or notes , then why would Marx make such a statement , surely the bankers have to be saving or gaining by notes being issued rather than gold coins , otherwise there’s no trick .

     

    in reply to: Capital vol 1 #204886
    mullrae
    Participant

    Is the simple answer to this there wasn’t enough gold in the 1850s to carry on minting sovereigns as the economy expands , gold being used for foreign exchange at the time in the form of bullion  , read a fair bit about the Bank of England at that time . Although banking hasn’t changed the mint doesn’t use gold coins anymore other than to sell to collectors ,  the link doesn’t explain the bankers trick , if the gold is only worth its face value then having a pound or a sovereign makes no difference .

     

    in reply to: Marx and the bluebooks #121594
    mullrae
    Participant

    The only thing I could find was this but how Marx was supposed to have falsified anything is beyond me https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/iwma/documents/1867/blue-book-speech.htm any views gratefully accepted regards ian.

    in reply to: Marx and the bluebooks #121587
    mullrae
    Participant

    Lynx kepler on Quora stated that marx had basically falsified steel and iron imports,exports to belgium in support of the belgium workers union.I followed the link but it doesn't make much sense to me so I wondered if anyone else had any views on Marx and the blue books regards ian.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)