[moderator1]

LBird wrote:

gnome wrote:

LBird wrote:

Vin Maratty wrote:

Another load bollocks from LBird. Same rubbish on every thread. 

I'll leave Paramjeet and Steve in your capable hands then, shall I, Vin?

Quite frankly I think you should, because your brand of 'obscurantism', rather than providing much needed clarity is simply muddying the waters still further.

Well, your clear-sighted thinking, along with Vin's obvious talents, will be enough to advise Paramjeet, then, won't they?Yeah, the world's 'so obvious', isn't it, gnome? There isn't really a problem for socialists, in their relation to workers. Just keep saying "it's obvious" to them, and they'll be attracted in droves, just like always.

1st Warning:  7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

[moderator1]

gnome wrote:

LBird wrote:

Vin Maratty wrote:

Another load bollocks from LBird. Same rubbish on every thread. 

I'll leave Paramjeet and Steve in your capable hands then, shall I, Vin?

Quite frankly I think you should, because your brand of 'obscurantism', rather than providing much needed clarity is simply muddying the waters still further.

1st Warning:  7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

[moderator1]

Vin Maratty wrote:

Moderation Rule Bookrule 1  Call marattyy whatever you want, feel free we will do nothing as he already has a bad name around hererule 2  Soon as maratty responds issue a warningrule 3 this will  piss maratty off enough and the EC will never let him back in and it will be proved that we were right  all along   

2nd Warning:  15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.

[moderator1]

Vin Maratty wrote:

I have sent you private messages but you ignored them and allowed the attackes against me to continue.How else do I communicate my disatisfaction and ask that the attacks be dealt with?Why don't you answer my private messages and explain why you have allowed this to continue Why dont you simply warn the perpetrator ?

1st Warning:  15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.

[moderator1]

Reminder:  15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.

[moderator1]

Reminder:  15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.

[moderator1]

Reminder:  7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

[moderator1]

Reminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

[moderator1]

Reminder:  1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.

[moderator1]

Reminder: Rule 7.  You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

[moderator1]

Reminder:  Rule 12. Moderators may move, remove, or lock any threads or posts which they deem to be off-topic or in violation of the rules. Because posts and threads can be deleted without advance notice, it is your responsibility to make copies of threads and posts which are important to you.I am seriously considering enforcing this rule and locking this thread, due to: 1. Posts not staying on thread.  2. The discussion is becoming personalised and not generalised. 3. The thread appears to have run its course.If I do decide to enforce Rule 12. I will not issue an advance warning, 

[moderator1]

Socialist Punk 1st Warning: Rule 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

[moderator1]

Reminder:  Rule 2. The forums proper are intended for public discussion. Personal messages between participants should be sent via private message or by e-mail.

[moderator1]

Reminder:  Rule 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

[moderator1]

Reminder:  Rule 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.

[Author]

Posts