moderator1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • moderator1
    Participant
    gnome wrote:
    Vin wrote:
    Is it not against forum rule 8 to have more than one account? 

    Yes it is, and this individual has had numerous.

    And every time he appears the account he's using gets blocked.  

    in reply to: Science for Communists? #103804
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

    in reply to: The Big Thinkers #110421
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.

    in reply to: Science for Communists? #103775
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

    in reply to: Nationalism – a failure of Marxist theory? #110384
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.

    in reply to: Missing Posts #110395
    moderator1
    Participant

    It was only 2 posts which were missing.  I've reposted both.

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108103
    moderator1
    Participant

    alanjjohnstone has commented on: "General Election – Campaign News"  —- They have also supported our own spoiled ballot paper tactic  "Where there is no supportable candidate, the CPGB urges voters to spoil their ballot papers with some suitable message: eg, ‘For socialism’ "  So no lesser evil, vote labour without illusions holding your noses recommndation as from others on the Left and have come out against any nationalists , even the left-nationalists of the SSP…No doubt inviting the wrath of being accused of sectarianism…the CPGB frequently taking that mantle from oursleves these days  Unfortunately, during a technical cleanup of the server data base the above post was inadvertently deleted.

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108102
    moderator1
    Participant

    jondwhite has commented on: "General Election – Campaign News"  —- Although the CPGB-PCC supported the SPGB at the 2014 Euroelection, a letter in Weekly Worker today states they were campaigning for Left Unity party in Vauxhall where an SPGB candidate is standing.  http://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1050/letters/ %5B1%5D  Whether they support other SPGB candidacies remains to be seen.  [1] http://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1050/letters/ Unfortunately, during a technical cleanup of the server data base the above post was inadvertently deleted.

    in reply to: Missing Posts #110394
    moderator1
    Participant

    These missing posts are not lost.  I'm sure they are still in my mailbox.  I can repost them with a suitable explanation.

    in reply to: Lamark and other things #110304
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder:  1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.  6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).

    in reply to: Hunter gatherer violence #109768
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

    in reply to: Ideology and class #110216
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.

    in reply to: Chomsky wrong on language? #110084
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder: 6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).Predicatable given the nature of this thread.  Duh!

    in reply to: Chomsky wrong on language? #110059
    moderator1
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
    Hud955 wrote:
    Chomsky claims that underneath all the superficial differences of actual grammars, there is a single underlying universal grammatical structure which was installed in our brain through genetic mutation some time in our ancestral past.  The problem is, he has never been able to identify a single rule belonging to  his underlying universal grammar which all languages have in common.

    Let alone identifying the gene or genes involved

    Hud955 wrote:
    I am no linguist, but I am also aware that languages divide the observable world up in different ways.  One particularly obvious example is the way they divide up the colour spectrum.  Colour words in Welsh for example do not map on to colour words in English. Welsh has a single word to cover what in English we would distinguish as dark blue and grey, for instance. 

    I didn't know that and I had to learn Welsh yn ysgol. As a matter of curiosity, what is the word?

    Here you go.The Celtic spectrum was different to the one the Western world is now used to, and based on the quality of a hue rather than its wavelength. So "llwyd" can mean brown (paper), blue (mould) or grey (rabbit); "glas" can mean blue (sky), green (grass), grey (horse) or transparent (saliva); "coch" can mean brown (sugar) or red (meat) and so on. There are learned papers on this "spectrum overlap", which is present in the traditions of Scotland and Ireland also.

    in reply to: Chomsky wrong on language? #110042
    moderator1
    Participant

    Reminder: 12. Moderators may move, remove, or lock any threads or posts which they deem to be off-topic or in violation of the rules. Because posts and threads can be deleted without advance notice, it is your responsibility to make copies of threads and posts which are important to you.

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 845 total)