moderator1
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
alanjjohnstone wrote:Perhaps the mod can change the thread title since i cannotWhat do you suggest?
Young Master Smeet wrote:Can I just make it clear, for the record, that this post/thread is not about the specific incident, but about the policy of retrospective warnings, and how ineffectual it is.I hasten to disagree, because if this specific incident had not occurred you would not be whinging now. As for warnings, retrospective or otherwise, are very effectual by drawing attention of the users that they need to acquaint themselves with the rules more often.If anyone feels strongly on this feel free to use the complaint procedure. All you have to do is PM me.
I have to follow the guidelines and rules which stipulates issuing a warning once a breach has occurred. The adoption of issuing a reminder was agreed upon to get over the old problem of seemingly issuing warnings retrospectively. If I were to agree to your suggestion I would in effect be issuing two reminders. When one should suffice.The banter was going OTT with Stuart noticably pushing it in that direction. I also took into consideration that this was a repeat performance of his previous suspension only this time it was not abusive or anti-social.Nevertheless because its only a minor infingement he will get off very lightly and have his suspension lifted on Friday.
ALB wrote:You don't appear to have read The Road to Wigan Pier.2nd Warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
ALB wrote:Isn't Corbyn teetotal and a vegetarian and believes in homeopathy? I wouldn't be surprised if he wore sandals and drank carrot juice too.1st Warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
Reminders: 15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.
stuartw2112 wrote:Is there anything wrong with not drinking alcohol, drinking carrot juice, eating vegetables or wearing sandals? Doesn't homeopathy do a great deal of good, working at least as well as placebo (which works surprisingly well, even if you know it's placebo, probably because merely to be listened to and sympathised with does you more good than the average trip to the reductionist materialist GP). As for Rush, better leave that to another thread!3rd Warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.This poster is suspended for an indefinite period.
Vin wrote:The 60s may have give us the Who and Lennon but it also gave us Freddy and the Dreamers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZckiY81Gi9E2nd Warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
imposs1904 wrote:stuartw2112 wrote:Excellent point Darren, but you're forgetting that your taste in music is wrong and punk was just awful.
post-punk, cheeky chops.I made a point of mentioning it twice in my post just in case someone got the wrong end of the drumstick. Now, please leave the thread with your Rush albums tucked under your arm. You have no place on a thread that touches on great music.
2nd Warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
stuartw2112 wrote:Another plus point from Alan: vote Corbyn for the better drugs2nd Warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
stuartw2112 wrote:Excellent point Darren, but you're forgetting that your taste in music is wrong and punk was just awful.1st Warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
alanjjohnstone wrote:What should be the musical anthem""We won't get fooled again"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYMD_W_r3FgBut to be truthful, i thought it was drugs we all took that made the music good…1st Warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
