moderator1
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 3, 2018 at 5:25 pm in reply to: How relevant is the Marxist theory in the twenty first century? #131754moderator1Participant
Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
moderator1ParticipantReminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
moderator1ParticipantBob Andrews wrote:Vin wrote:Can you offer any proof for this? I have never committed any act of violence and anyone who knows me would testify to that.I'll swear on a dozen Communist Manifestos. Last time Vin had a fight he was just eleven. Only won that because she had an asthma attack.
1st warning: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
moderator1ParticipantTheMightyYoghourt wrote:Vincent, you disingenuous cockwit, it was only a few years ago when you were boasting about your history of knocking opponent's teeth out when they didn't agree with you. And it was shortly after that when you said some very abusive things to me personally on Fuckbook. Since you were being such a wanker, I blocked you and carried on writing. Then you realised that I'd blocked you because people were writing about what I'd written and you couldn't see what I'd written. At that point you tried to get party members to be outraged by the fact that I'd blocked you for being a cunt.Then you got expelled from the party. For being a cunt. You voted against me being elected as an EC member. Whilst serving on the EC I witnessed your machinations to get back into the party. I spoke against you being re-admitted, because you'd caused no end of trouble with your puerile bollocks and threatened me personally. (Which, I might mention, I derived much amusement from. You are a stupid old man and I hold a third dan black belt and could easily kick your bitchy little ass.) I left the party for two reasons. The main one was the fact that ten reasonably intelligent people are incapable of making a rational decision together. Witness the Election Broadcast that cost £3000. And the other one was that you were going to get back in the party. Motherfucker, you'd know who I am if you had half a brain. I am no coward. I am the Mighty Motherfucking Guru Yoghourt. Get in the ring,No, actually, don't bother.Indefinite suspension:7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages. 8. Do not register or operate more than one account without first obtaining permission from the moderators. Do not share your password with others or allow anyone else to use your account. Do not use your account to post messages on behalf of any suspended user, without prior permission from the moderators. This user has been suspended indefinitely for using a sock puppet account to gain access to the forum when he had been previously suspended indefinitley under Rule 7.
moderator1ParticipantReminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
moderator1ParticipantReminder: 6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).
moderator1ParticipantReminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
moderator1ParticipantReminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.8. Do not register or operate more than one account without first obtaining permission from the moderators. Do not share your password with others or allow anyone else to use your account. Do not use your account to post messages on behalf of any suspended user, without prior permission from the moderators.
moderator1ParticipantReminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
moderator1ParticipantVin wrote:moderator1 wrote:But surely you already knew this seeing you was party to bringing it into operation?Just to clarify: NO I have had nohing to do with the formation of Forum Rules.
This is not to do with the rules but the procedures.
moderator1ParticipantVin wrote:I see third waning has been issued. So it is 4 warnings before suspension?No its 3 warnings, then a 30 day cooling off period. If the rules are breached during this 30 day period then its an automatic suspension. But surely you already knew this seeing you was party to bringing it into operation?
moderator1ParticipantVin wrote:May I request clarification?Is there a new rule in force? Two second warnings in place10.51http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/general-discussion/myth-overcrowded-britain?page=4and 1.12http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/general-discussion/statisation-possible-flaw-world-socialism?page=1#comment-45142Thanks fo0r that.
moderator1ParticipantIke Pettigrew wrote:ALB wrote:You've missed the point. The objection is not to you (or anyone else) criticising what we do stand for, but to you asking us to defend something you attribute to us but that we don't stand for (i.e.to defend something that doesn't exist). You can of course criticise that idea too but don't attribute it to us and don't expect us to defend it.I think you misunderstand me, but I'm not interested in discussing it anymore.I'm sick of internet discussions in which people like you with a sense of entitlement and imagined grievance go round in circles with:"But you're asking us to defend X, Y and Z", etc. and similar.I'm not asking you to defend anything.I wish you would grow up and either just add a constructive comment in the thread OR fuck off.
3rd and final Warning: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.This user is informed that if he breaches the rules within the next 30 days he'll be immediately suspended.
moderator1Participantalanjjohnstone wrote:Quote:you decide who you want here.Our moderator is very even-handed, Ike.I think every member of the forum has been warned to stick to the topic and desist from personal comments. I know. I have been suspended a fair number of times. Vin, i believe, holds the record. Despite holding political views that i sometimes find offensive and which have the potential consequence of providing support for the nastiest of people, this discussion list abides by its guidelines https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum-rules-and-guidelinesI think how we deal with those who break the rules of the forum, in a little way, reflects our response of how we consider rules inside socialism will operate.
Actually, its not Vin who holds the record, he's had 3 suspensions. In fact its LBird with 5 suspensions.The rule of thumb on the forum is the first breach of the rules draws my attention but I rarely take action. The second breach means I automatically post a reminder that a breach has occurred. Further breaches of any of the rules by the same offender means a 1st warning is posted. After the 3rd and final warning a 30 day cooling off period is actioned. If a breach occurs during this period its an automatic suspension – the length of which depends on the seriousness of the breach and the past record of the offender. For example, LBird got suspended for 60 days on his last breach due to him failing to get the message that the rules are there for a purpose so as to enable and encourage discussion and not further argumentation. I only action indefinite suspensions on spammers and those who make threats of violence.
moderator1ParticipantIke Pettigrew wrote:My post was clearly not abusive, but it's your forum, you decide who you want here. It makes little difference to me.Here's a tune I think Vin will specially like:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QES-eQ4lR5U2nd Warning: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
-
AuthorPosts