moderator1
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Vin wrote:Brian Whywould you give a comrade a warning for that.?
3rd and final warning: 14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
Vin wrote:I am sure you are under pressure from committee but chill out and leave fun alone. Revolution will be fun or we wouldn't bother.People will turn away from boring strict bookworms and be drawn to positive things. Very early materialism I know but still intuitiveWhy remove jokes?2nd Warning: 14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
Vin wrote:Mod is removing friendly posts from this thread which is inexplicable the threads perhaps show NERB comrades sense of humour ffs Brian take a chill pill. It is harmless banter. Have you got a sense of humour?Yes I've got a sense of humour, but I've also got a sense of proportion and acceptable and appropriate behaviour. This forum of is for serious discussion it is not facebook where banter or otherwise is a constant feature.Please note I've always allowed a certain amount of banter and humour but come on 8 posts lets be serious that is way out of proportion. Like I've mentioned it was either issuing a warning or removing them to the Off-topic section.I choose the latter.
Will all users please note rather than issue several warnings under rule 1. for being off-topic I have taken the action of removing these 8 posts to the Off-topic section. Users can read them there.If however, these breaches continue I will issue warnings.
Mon, 07/03/2016 – 12:17am#16VinOnlineJoined:03/12/2011Send PM Tim have you noticed the Mod 1 removing posts?I used the word Git.
Mon, 07/03/2016 – 12:05am#14Tim KilgallonOnlineJoined:17/11/2015Send PM If you have any further problems with swearing, I can refer you to the offices of my solicitors messers Hadaway and Shite
Mon, 07/03/2016 – 12:01am#13VinOnlineJoined:03/12/2011Send PM Reprobate and foul mouthed I admit with pride but Young?? lol
Sun, 06/03/2016 – 11:54pm#11Tim KilgallonOnlineJoined:17/11/2015Send PM Comrade Marratty, Had I known you had used words like Hell, I would never have supported you. You disgust me, you foul mouthed young reprobate!
Tim Kilgallon wrote:moderator1 wrote:Tim Kilgallon wrote:As our Branch Secretary has now been indefinitely suspended from using Spintcom (with moderators citing issues from 2013, for god's sake). Can members of the IC or Spintcom/Forum moderators please explain to me how, with our Branch Secretary unable to use these crucial tools, our branch is going to function in the same way as other party branches? Is it the case that functions available to other branches will not now be available to our branch?The suspension of Cde Vince Marraty from SPINTcom and SPopen will not affect the activities of the NERB Branch. Other members of the Branch can still post on those lists and this forum is still open to all members of NERB. In addition, on this forum the Branch has an allocated section to conduct its business.Not all Branches take advantage of the functions available on the lists or indeed on this forum. Yet they still function by using other means of communication. Its highly unlikely that Branch activity will be affected by the suspension of one of its members from the internal party lists.
Ah, really glad you agree with my viewpoint that SPINTcom and SPopen are largely an irrelevence, as much use as a one legged man in an arse kicking competition, as my old man used to say.
I did not imply no do I agree with the viewpoint that SPINTcom and SPopen are "largely an irrelevence". In fact far from it for from my perspective the more medium available to individual party members the more choice they have on using the one most appropriate to their communication needs and skills.
Tim Kilgallon wrote:As our Branch Secretary has now been indefinitely suspended from using Spintcom (with moderators citing issues from 2013, for god's sake). Can members of the IC or Spintcom/Forum moderators please explain to me how, with our Branch Secretary unable to use these crucial tools, our branch is going to function in the same way as other party branches? Is it the case that functions available to other branches will not now be available to our branch?The suspension of Cde Vince Marraty from SPINTcom and SPopen will not affect the activities of the NERB Branch. Other members of the Branch can still post on those lists and this forum is still open to all members of NERB. In addition, on this forum the Branch has an allocated section to conduct its business.Not all Branches take advantage of the functions available on the lists or indeed on this forum. Yet they still function by using other means of communication. Its highly unlikely that Branch activity will be affected by the suspension of one of its members from the internal party lists.
Vin wrote:Thanks for the confirmation of my assertion Mod1 (member of the Internet Committee)1st Warning: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
Reminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
Vin wrote:This resolution by the February EC is beyond comprehension MOTION 14: The EC authorises the Internet Committee to contact the owner of the account and request that they specify that the account is not officially endorsed by the party (Craggs/Scholey) 5-0-0 Why on earth has the EC passed this motion without any explanation and without first contacting NERB? There is no explanation of why the IC wishes to close the account down It is beyond my comprehension and inexplicable that an EC of the SPGB would prevent this activity V maratty,Quite a bit of scaremongering on your part comrade! The motion is not requesting the IC to close this twitter account down but to ask the owner – yourself – to specify it carries no party endorsement.But I take it from your previous post that you closed this account down before the EC meeting.
jon brownOfflineJoined:07/04/2013Send PM In the current Socialist Standard in the Book Review section Adam Buick revirews "Who's Afriad of the Easter Rising?". He states people who are prepared to die for their beliefs deserve some respect. Cannot and do not agree with this. I am sure Adam didn't this to intend support for suicide bombers etc. I think we should reserve our respect for those who are conscripted against their will or even more so for the really courageous who refuse to be conscripted and take all the consequences for refusing.
