moderator1
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
lindanesocialist wrote:Suggestion: Mod 1 would step aside. He is the only Mod continually sending posts from myself to offtopic. He is clearly bias and prejudice
If another moderator was available they would have taken the same action. All such actions are agreed by a majority of the moderators.This being the case would you care to retract the allegation of bias and prejudice?
Reminder: 14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
Mon, 05/09/2016 – 8:59pm#11Tim KilgallonOnlineJoined:17/11/2015Send PM Well I've got to say mate , if the one on the right is your sister in law, any chance of an introduction "ding bloody dong". If she played her cards right she could be the future Mrs Kilgallon.
Mon, 05/09/2016 – 8:38pm#10lindanesocialistOnlineJoined:28/03/2016Send PM Vin said I'm a the one with the appearance of a Troll but that doesn't make me one. That would be racist The other two is wor lass and her sister and they look nothing like sockpuppets. It would be very insulting to say so.
Mon, 05/09/2016 – 8:38pm#10lindanesocialistOnlineJoined:28/03/2016Send PM Vin said I'm a the one with the appearance of a Troll but that doesn't make me one. That would be racist The other two is wor lass and her sister and they look nothing like sockpuppets. It would be very insulting to say so.
Mon, 05/09/2016 – 6:12pm#8lindanesocialistOfflineJoined:28/03/2016Send PM Pictures taken from our passports, proof positive that we are neither sock puppets nor trolls Top
Mon, 05/09/2016 – 5:51pm#6lindanesocialistOfflineJoined:28/03/2016Send PM Tim Kilgallon wrote: I've got to say Linda & Vin, if YMS is having a pop at you, which is by no means certain. Lad Haddywayinshite Hinnie, Ya naw nowt
Tim Kilgallon wrote:Hi Alan, I asked a question in a previous post, which I think kind of got lost in the deluge of posts, but I'll pose it again.As an ex trade union rep/steward, would you have found acceptable a management procedure that involved an apeeal/review against a disciplinary matter or a dismissal, being undertaken by a panel which contained the manager whose decision was being reviewed?Tim may I reassure you we are addressing this very issue at this moment in time. Presently we are deliberating on the draft document and once we decide our efforts are acceptable they will be communicated to the full IC in their draft form for further discussion. If the IC agree in principle to the document then its open for amendment and alteration and will eventually end up in front of the EC.On the other hand if a majority of the IC do not accept the principle we start again. Not that I think its likely to happen. If I may say so it is not a narrative on "guidelines" but a working document invoking Direct Participatory Democracy for all users of the forum. And as such it will be a new departure for the party in terms of involving non-members in the rules for conversations on the internet.In this respect we have also had to take into consideration internet etiquette so it matches with the party's practice of DPD, common complaints procedures, how to handle a grievance which is acceptable and appropriate to all parties and last but not least the setting up an independent panel.Hope this helps.
Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts. 2. The forums proper are intended for public discussion. Personal messages between participants should be sent via private message or by e-mail.7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
Sat, 03/09/2016 – 1:10pm#128Tim KilgallonOfflineJoined:17/11/2015Send PM lindanesocialist wrote: SocialistPunk wrote: You keep peddling the same distortion regardig Vin's last suspension. It wasn't for off topic, it was for breaching rues 7, 14 and 15.http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/world-socialist-movement/twitte… Your post is disrespectful and contadictory, I am 'peddling' only a bike. Your link show Vin being banned for challenging the unfairness of moderation.Which moderation do not like to hear. I am leaving this subject, it has been flogged to death but I will ask quarterly if the ban still stands.Vin repeats he will follow the forum rules but will not make an act of contrition, This is a revolutionary organisation, some members need to stop treating it as a religious sectquia nunc vale Benedictum tibi, filia. Pax moderator esse teum. Vale et ampilus iam noli peccare.I knew a catholic education would come in useful eventually!!!!
Reminder: Rule 15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal.
Reminder: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.
Reminder: 7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
Mon, 22/08/2016 – 2:33am#1moderator1OnlineJoined:03/11/2013Send PM After due consideration by the moderators it was decided to reinstate the following post on this thread. The post was seen as a satirical and humourous contribution and was placed where all jokes go. The moderators now realise it is going to be part of a serious appeal to the EC and so its returned to the appropriate thread and express our apologies for mistaken the intent of the post. Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty's indefinite forum banSun, 21/08/2016 – 6:10pm#39lindanesocialistOfflineJoined:28/03/2016 Send PM After further consideration, Vin has decided to appeal against the decision to effectively ban him for life from party forums and has asked me to post this appeal: Appeal against Moderators decision on Vin Maratty Suspension dated 18th August 2016 As a way forward can I suggest Father Ted, Father Jack and Father Dougal (aka as Mods 1, 2 & 3) take a step down from their pearly thrones and have a think about how they have gone about this process As my main complaints were against the way Mod1 moderated my posts, surely he ought to have stepped aside for the sake of natural justice. I neither see, nor am aware of, any specific reference to this sub-committee of the Executive Committee having been given the authority to dispense 'summary justice' in the form of an indefinite ban upon a forum user. In the case of an infringement by a party member, should the transgression be considered so egregious, the appropriate course of action would be for the Executive Committee to instigate a charge of action detrimental to the interests of the party as provided for under Rule 31. As for appealing to the EC Executive Committee is elected annually by the party membership, meets monthly and runs the day-to-day affairs of the party in accordance with the rules and democratic decisions agreed by the membership. Most EC members do not frequent online forums, and some have made it clear their bias towards me by dismissing my work with nothing but insults. How can we expect the present EC to come to an informed unbiased decision as it becoming increasingly apparent this present EC doesn't know its arse from its elbow. Some members don't know how to watch a video let alone make one. I submit that the Holy Trinity be dissolved temporarily to consider my appeal. ‘Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.’ I ask that Mod1 steps aside for the sake of natural justice and the decision discussed again by the remaining two Mods YFS Vin Maratty
