[moderator1]

reminder: 6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).

[moderator1]

Reminder: 6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).

[moderator1]

Reminder: 14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.

[moderator1]

Granted at one time Pozzi was deliberately bumping his posts to advertise his link.  However, the last time he posted on that thread was 11/04/17 and it contained no advert.  The thread was then bumped up by Marcos on the 12/04/17.  

[moderator1]

Just because a post gets bumped up by a poster (whose not the original OP) is not a breach of the rules. If on the other hand if it is bumped up by the original poster and it contains the advert Possi will be suspended for breaching the rules.

[moderator1]

Vin wrote:

Any chance that Admin could remove the Advert that remains the first item we see when entering the most frequented part of the forum. I am referring to Ponsi in GENERAL DISCUSSION. Ponsi is  taking the piss and making us look naive and  foolish. 

There are two options:  1. I as moderator remove the post to the Off-topic or Rubbish section. 2. Posters refrain from bumping it up by responding to every little nuance contained in the previous post.Option 1, is out of my remit.  Option 2. is down to posters PM'ing the main culprits and requesting them to do the obvious. 

[moderator1]

alanjjohnstone wrote:

One question has now been answered – what chemical was used http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-39648503

Quote:

"Incontrovertible" test results show sarin gas or a similar substance was used in the chemical weapons attack in Syria earlier this month, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) says.

Now the matter of what is settled it is now the questions who and why?

Now that the investigation has identified the chemical as sarin the finger must pointing at Assad. As for the why is that relevant in a war situation?

[moderator1]

Sympo wrote:

moderator1 wrote:

Interesting commentary:  http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-the-latest-claims-against-assad-are-a-pack-of-lies/5584556

I haven't read the article you linked but the guy who owns the site Globalresearch is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist. So be sceptical of everything you read on that site. RationalWiki has an article about it:Globalresearch – RationalWiki

I was aware the site pushes half truths.  I found it interesting for the confirmation that the actual chemical is still unidentified.

[moderator1]

Interesting commentary:  http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-the-latest-claims-against-assad-are-a-pack-of-lies/5584556

[moderator1]

Vin wrote:

Yeah, that was probably me. But I was told that it was  my browser. Shame because it is a good way to advertise the forum and the partyPerhaps you will have more joyI couldn't share this thread even with another browser

Alternatively you can copy and paste the URL.

[moderator1]

Reminder: 6. Do not make repeated postings of the same or similar messages to the same thread, or to multiple threads or forums (‘cross-posting’). Do not make multiple postings within a thread that could be consolidated into a single post (‘serial posting’). Do not post an excessive number of threads, posts, or private messages within a limited period of time (‘flooding’).

[moderator1]

Sympo wrote:

Didn't I write a new post in this thread? Was it deleted or did I forget to send it?Ugh, it was pretty long one…is there any way to get it back?

No posts on this thread have been deleted or removed.

[moderator1]

alanjjohnstone wrote:

should read Inequality OR unfairness

Would you like me to change it?

[moderator1]

John Pozzi wrote:

robbo203 has commented on: "100% reserve banking"—-/John Pozzi/ wrote:.Real money values the product of nature, i.e. the natural resources that are basis of our economy.John Pozzi, your comments are becoming more and more bizarre and surreal. Do you know what money is and what it signifies? How is it a product of nature? Natural resoruces are not money, for heavens sake, though they can bebought for money and that only relatively recently in human histiryJohn Pozzi: Stat money like US$ signify taxes on the product of labor to pay the interest to capitalist banks like the Fed.Rear money, i.e., GRB ecos, signify the universal value of the product of nature, i.e., the generation of biomass in an ecosystem, usually expressed in units of mass per unit surface (or volume) per unit time, for instance, grams per square metre per day (g m−2 d−1). The mass unit may relate to dry matter or to the mass of carbon generated. Productivity of autotrophs such as plants is called primary natural productivity, while that of heterotrophs such as animals is called secondary productivity.Secondary production is the generation of biomass of heterotrophic (consumer) organisms in a system. This is driven by the transfer of organic material between trophic levels, and represents the quantity of new tissue created through the use of assimilated food that everyone consumes.Vin, Thanks for the hoot, it made me laugh, John ;o)

3rd and final warning: 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts.This 3rd and final warning will apply for the next 30 days.If this user persists in breaching the rules during that time he'll be issued with a suspension.

[moderator1]

John Pozzi wrote:

mcolome1 has commented o the GRB "100% reserve banking"Hi mcolome1,Thank you for your comment on The People's Global Resource Bank Economy.John Pozzi – http://www.grb.net.

2nd warning: 3. Do not use the forums to send spam, advertisements, charitable appeals, solicitations, or other messages primarily intended to promote a particular product, service, campaign, website, organisation, venture, or event, unless it is relevant to the SPGB or its companion parties, without first obtaining permission from the moderators.

[Author]

Posts