Moo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 287 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Passing Show: the Death of a Clown #231137
    Moo
    Participant

    https://www.facebook.com/ledbydonkeys/videos/560420942266948

    Try not to laugh at all the times he promised not to do something, then did it. What’s poignant is all these evil b*stards could have been good people if they were born into a socialist world.

    P.S. Thanks, ALB, for posting a link to the source of the claims.

    in reply to: The Passing Show: the Death of a Clown #231114
    Moo
    Participant

    “[The collective West] back in February had suggested Zelensky should surrender and flee”

    I find that highly questionable.

    in reply to: Scottish referendum…again #230912
    Moo
    Participant

    If western governments really cared about the Ukrainian people they would match humanitarian aid with military aid.

    in reply to: Scottish referendum…again #230876
    Moo
    Participant

    Yet again, the burning questions of the referendum will be:

    1. Will Scotland join the EU or the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), or neither?

    2. What will happen to the UK’s nuclear weapons (that are based in Scotland)?

    3. What will happen to the border between England and Scotland?

    4. What will happen to non-Scottish Brits living in Scotland, and vice versa?

    5. What currency would Scotland use?

    6. Will Scotland join the Commonwealth Realm or become a republic?

    Apart from number 4, the above questions are a bunch of trivialities that distract from the real problems facing the world. Although, sadly, just like Brexit, people will get very passionate about whether the workers of Scotland should be exploited by Scottish/European capitalism or British capitalism.

    in reply to: Scottish referendum…again #230869
    Moo
    Participant

    “Will it be seats won or votes cast for the SNP (and the Green Party)?”

    I predict the SNP would win a majority of the seats, but they (and the Greens) wouldn’t win a majority of the votes.

    However, the issue will likely be resolved before the general election. This is because the SNP apparently wants to hold a consultative referendum (i.e. a non-legally binding one), so if they win it they can say to Westminster: “The people have spoken and they want freeeeeedoooooom!”.

    in reply to: French presidential elections #230657
    Moo
    Participant

    It’s confusing when people use the terms ‘left’ and ‘right’ to describe social as well as economic policy.

    After reading dozens of Socialist Standards, the consensus (in the SPGB) seems to be: Hard-Left = Leninists; Soft-Left = Greens, Corbynistas, the SNP; Soft-Right = Blairites, Liberal Democrats; Hard-Right = Conservatives, Reform UK.

    With that in mind, Macron is a hard-right social liberal; Mélenchon is a soft-left social liberal; and Le Pen is a soft-right neo-fascist. What do they all have in common? They’re all on Team Capitalism.

    in reply to: Scottish referendum…again #230504
    Moo
    Participant

    Damn it! I was one month out! I said after the 2019 General Election, there would be a second Scottish independence referendum in September 2023.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jun/15/nicola-sturgeon-second-scottish-independence-referendum-october-2023

    in reply to: New World Order #227335
    Moo
    Participant

    Thanks for the feedback, Adam.

    Another interesting article from the standard archives. This one is about the World Economic Forum; their annual meetings in Davos; and real-life Bond-villain Klaus Schwab: https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-standard/2014/2010s/no-1315-march-2014/davos-elites-think-globally-act-greedily/

    in reply to: New World Order #227309
    Moo
    Participant

    A very long article that goes into much more detail:

    Technocracy: The Operating System For The New International Rules-Based Order

    in reply to: Labour win less than 2% of the vote #219883
    Moo
    Participant

    The Alliance for Green Socialism won 104 votes in B & S. I checked them out the other day, and they appear to be a cross between the Green Party and the Socialist Party (England & Wales); in that they are very reformist; believe in zero-growth capitalism (what an oxymoron!); and they want to nationalise big businesses.

    in reply to: Labour win less than 2% of the vote #219803
    Moo
    Participant

    I recommend starting a new topic for the Batley & Spen by-election.

    in reply to: Labour win less than 2% of the vote #219778
    Moo
    Participant

    Thanks, Adam, for the helpful information regarding why the SPGB didn’t advocate universal suffrage in the early 20th century.

    in reply to: Labour win less than 2% of the vote #219464
    Moo
    Participant

    You’ve made a good point. However, here’s a question for you:

    If there was a referendum this year on extending the franchise to 16 & 17 year olds, what (do you reckon) would be the SPGB’s position?

    in reply to: Labour win less than 2% of the vote #219463
    Moo
    Participant

    I never wrote or implied I’m against people who don’t have the right to vote being allowed to join the Party (and participate in party affairs) as equal members.

    in reply to: Labour win less than 2% of the vote #219406
    Moo
    Participant

    Don’t read very much into the Chesham and Amersham by-election. Voter turnout was only 52%, whereas, it was 77% for the last two general elections. Although, it does say something about Labour’s strategy of attracting voters by copying the Conservatives.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 287 total)