Moo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 322 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Tensions #247010
    Moo
    Participant

    “We can achieve socialism without women.” – Mr. Nobody

    in reply to: Will sport & competitive games exist in socialism? #246980
    Moo
    Participant

    “Batéy was the name given to a special plaza around which the Caribbean Taino built their settlements. It was usually a rectangular area surrounded by stones with carved symbols (petroglyphs).

    “The batey was the area in which batey events (e.g. ceremonies, the ball game, etc.) took place. The batey ceremony (also known as batu) can be viewed from some historical accounts as more of a judicial contest rather than a game. Because historical accounts of the game and court space come from (mostly Spanish) European explorers, the true nature, history, and function of the batey is still contested. Neighbouring tribes may have used batey matches to resolve differences without warfare.” SOURCE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batey_(game)

    in reply to: Will sport & competitive games exist in socialism? #246939
    Moo
    Participant

    I can’t believe socialists are defending rugby & boxing! You’d get an immediate red card (& be booed off the pitch) if you did any rugby moves in football. As for boxing, Muhammad Ali couldn’t speak for the last years of his life due to being so brain-damaged.

    ‘Or offside.’

    My knee-jerk reaction to that was: you can’t get rid of the off-side rule! But, actually, it would mean a lot more goals, so that’s a good idea. VAR is good (as long as it ONLY benefits the teams I support). 😉

    in reply to: Will sport & competitive games exist in socialism? #246932
    Moo
    Participant

    ‘On the one hand, it’s very hard to imagine a world without sport & competitive games, but on the other hand, it’s hard to imagine a socialist society with them.’ What I mean by this is games are fun, but will anyone care about being the winner when we live in a society based on co-operation instead of competition?

    Violent sports such as rugby & boxing almost definitely won’t exist in socialism. It’s hard to imagine trophies existing in socialism because some people would like to steal them, so they would have to be guarded, so we’re talking about security guards in a socialist society (which doesn’t sound right).

    I’m a casual football fan, but it’s hard to imagine socialist football where the fans don’t give the referee & linesmen/women a hard time, and fans of arch-rival teams (e.g. Celtic & Rangers) are nice to each other.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #246923
    Moo
    Participant

    From the above song (that Paula likes so much): ‘I dreamed I saw a mighty room,
    The room was full of [world leaders].
    And the paper they were signing said,
    They’d never fight again.’

    That could only happen in a dream. While its a lovely song, it shows how effective capitalist propaganda is, because it assumes wars are caused by mad world leaders, and also, it’s the ‘plebs’ who do the fighting, not world leaders. Finally, it was obviously written a long time ago, because the world leaders are all men.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #246901
    Moo
    Participant

    Thanks for the very interesting historical information, ALB.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #246891
    Moo
    Participant

    – ALB

    I’m confused. Wasn’t Ukraine part of the USSR at that time?

    in reply to: Pinochet, Allende and Chilean path to socialism #246788
    Moo
    Participant

    The Left believe that weak countries which defy imperialism from the powerful ones are doing so because they want to help their people. The reality is they want to support their OWN capitalist class at the expense of the capitalist class of the powerful, imperialist country.

    in reply to: Poetry #246787
    Moo
    Participant

    Fair enough. Another reason to get rid of capitalism: copyright laws!

    in reply to: Geordie logic #246752
    Moo
    Participant

    There’s nothing make-believe about social ownership and social control for social purposes (i.e. social-ism).

    To which group of Leninists to you belong, Lizzie?

    in reply to: Geordie logic #246743
    Moo
    Participant

    – Young Master Smeet

    What you wrote about Geordies is so offensive, I can’t believe it was written by a fellow socialist!

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #246681
    Moo
    Participant

    The Left are no better. They believe Russia & China are justifiably(!) defending their ‘back-gardens’ from U.S dominance.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #246528
    Moo
    Participant

    Cheers. 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #246525
    Moo
    Participant

    ‘When Russia first invaded Ukraine two cities negotiated to allow the Russian army to take over without armed resistance – Kherson on the Black Sea coast and Kupiansk near Kharkov and the border with Russia. This saved the places from destruction and their population from being killed in any crossfire and was obviously the sensible thing for the local authorities to have done.

    ‘But it wasn’t to last. Last year the Ukrainian nationalists recaptured Kupiansk and later the Russian army withdrew from Kherson. They were “liberated” but were now in the front line and both have since been bombarded and large parts of them reduced to ruins.’

    ALB, may I use this quote in a letter I’m currently writing in response to the below Ukrainian nationalist article in the Frome Times?

    http://www.frometimes.co.uk/2023/08/30/frome-honours-ukrainian-independence-day/

    in reply to: Party news #246375
    Moo
    Participant

    DJP, I didn’t mean literal fighting. I meant trying to persuade the workers of the world to become socialists.

    The way I see it is: if the world socialist revolution was meant to happen, then it will, but if it wasn’t, then it won’t.

    All we in the World Socialist Movement can do is help it arrive sooner, rather than later.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 322 total)