Lizzie45
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Do we have a copy of the article we published on the coronation of George V in 1910? I think it was called “The Coronation of King Capital”.
Is this the article?
I ask myself the same question, but you’re probably asking the wrong people on this forum.
I think the word in English is rhetorical; in this case a question which is not expected to elicit a response. 🙂
According to Frankie Boyle, the royals are a crime syndicate we should throw molotov cocktails at…
“The time has come to say farewell to the monarchy. Let’s raise a bottle to them, filled with petrol and a burning rag.”
Why is this country having a coronation, anyway? No other European monarchy bothers. The last one in Spain was in 1555, and the Scandinavian monarchies in Denmark, Sweden and Norway had all deemed the archaic practice redundant by 1906.
He abandoned Socialism and embraced Propertarianism after reading Ludwig Von Mises…
Thanks for the clarification.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ramsay_Steele
Not to be confused with Tommy! 🙂
Was the author of the above article the same Steele who later underwent a conversion to libertarianism?
The difference between a man and a child is the type of toys that he plays with, and the devil is the devil because he is old, it is not because he is the devil
You really do talk an awful lot of shit, MC.
Please let TS come back – if only to liven up this forum once again! 🙂
You have the nerve to call others here hypocrites but I cannot help but notice your complete silence when it comes to rebuking TS for his absolutely reprehensible behaviour. Why is that Lizzie45?
Because I contend that the so-called absolutely reprehensible behaviour of TS is essentially no different to the abuse levelled against her by others on this forum.
TS, is very clearly a troll with no interest in serious debate only in insulting people whose views he doesn’t like…
And your response is to censor someone whose views you don’t like which in itself is a complete abuse of the democratic principle.
Fucking hypocrites!
Most peoples and organizations out there know the seriousness of our socialist principles
Bwhahahahahahahaha
No, I don’t think Chiang and Mao were “buddies” at all
Look like ‘buddies’ to me…
They can put Micky House at the White House and he will do the same job as the other ones
Is Micky House a pseudonym for the White Mouse?
That last h doesn’t have an a on it. Berk. Otherwise it’s a devastating response.
7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
So you can stick your sick sociopathic pro-nationalist pro-capitalist views somewhere where the sun doesn’t shine as far as I am concerned and crawl back under whatever rock you came from….
7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.
14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
The Moderators can be contacted via spgb.internet [at] worldsocialism.org
Being not particularly rational (whatever that means) would prompt one to vote for a candidate with a silly name. If you were sensible you wouldn’t.
Which aptly demonstrates that the people of Tunbridge Wells must be eminently more sensible than those of Uxbridge and South Ruislip. Shannon Phineas Trahern Kennedy received the grand total of 11 votes. 🙂
