[lindanesocialist]

Perhaps that is our problem. We talk a lot of irrelevant rubbish , while  Corbyn talks about issues affecting the working class. 

[lindanesocialist]

alanjjohnstone wrote:

But for those who seek no moderation at all, that post is one of the more gentler exchanges you will expect to find being posted – so be pre-warned if that is the path you wish to tread  

Alan I appreciate what you say but you talk as if you don't have a member suspend for six months and probably permanently which to some is VERY harsh moderation.But as for the list of possible culprits? It;s a case of Who Killed JR LOL.   

[lindanesocialist]

northern light wrote:

Lindanesocialist said;  quote [ Wow, wish you defended Vin so well] unquote.You seem to have forgoten who it was who fought in Vin's corner on the previous occasion that he was suspended from the Forum.

Vin said:No, I will never forget that cde,  and I have told him so.  I understand Mod3 your son is having health problems, please wish him well. His health is more important than all this crap Keep well Joe and Steve Vin and Linda 

[lindanesocialist]

moderator3 wrote:

I am aware it was a comment designed to illicit an emotional response. My point is, this forum is littered with posts that are aimed at doing just that. Do we block all users when they go a trolling?I have contacted Admin to see if he can sged any light on the issue.

Thankyou mod3. Very much appreciated

[lindanesocialist]

moderator3 wrote:

Just logged on and I can report that the flag/report function has been activated. Forum users can no longer see when it has been activated.I'm not really sure what action can be justified against the post in question? Do users wish to see accounts blocked every time a single, non threatening, inflammatory comment is made?

Didn't they teach you anything at moderation classes. He is a troll, his only contribution has been to illicit an emotional response.Furthermore, he is clearly a member of the party. Wow, wish you defended Vin so well

[lindanesocialist]

Dropthebomb wrote:

Hooraaaaay! Do you think they mean it this time?

Hello ComradeYou obviously rejoice when members leave the party. Why?How many members have you seen off? Why do you prefer small sects to mass movements?By definition a mass movements will contain people you don't like. This leads me to believe that you prefer a cosy little sectarian group.Do you think you have contributed to the  lack of growth of the SPGB? 

[lindanesocialist]

Why has this troll not been removed? How can moderation justify this,  

[lindanesocialist]

Why can't  the report button be used on dropthebomb post?

[lindanesocialist]

Tim Kilgallon wrote:

 I sincerely hope that Vin and Linda have had time to rethink their contribution and that "drop the bomb" goes and crawls back under whichever rock they crawled out from under.

Thanks Tim, we will wait until ADM, if Vin is restored as an equal then we will stay, if ADM does not restore his basic rights vis a vis forum membership and the right to be nominated onto committees, then we will be off.Surely that is understandable to all.As for  members like dropthebomb? There's more than one but it helps confirm my beliefs about where the party is right now.

[lindanesocialist]

Tim Kilgallon wrote:

Are you really naive enough to think that it's jsomeone who joined in the last few days, Considering they are referring to past events, do you not think it's more likely to be someone who has been a regular contributor who has set up a second account to send this message, because they haven't got the courage or the integrity to express an opinion like that in an open and honest way? I sincerely hope that Vin and Linda have had time to rethink their contribution and that "drop the bomb" goes and crawls back under whichever rock they crawled out from under.

Yes Tim  This is very creepy. Even more creepy is the fact this anonymous individual, receives no warning from moderation and is allowed to continue on the forum. While a hard working comrade like Vin is forced to leave the party because of said creep.Make no mistake this a party member  in disguise  and a coward who does not have the courage to show their  face.And under such circumstances their comment is worthless. Unllike the character assassination email sent to CB secretary about Vin. =  There's one suspect.I think I know who it is and I can understand why you want to see the back of Vin This not a school yard. Have the courage to speak under your real name CREEP. You have done nothing for the Party but sit on your arse and criticise others trying to work. Moderators should remove this account which is obviously an SPGB member Trolling under another account 

[lindanesocialist]

Vin said:"I know I have said this before but that's it. Definitely finished with the SPGB. "So its goodby from me and its goodbye from him

[lindanesocialist]

mcolome1 wrote:

 L Bird, specially is constantly breaking the rules of this forum, and he is always trying to impose his own point of view, and always try to change the topics, insulting members of the forum, calling stupid and clowns the members of the Socialist Party,  and nothing has happened to him, and Vin was suspended permanently, and he is a member of the SP .

Indeed, and the mods passionately defend LBird's right to post  while at the same time declaring that they have no intention of ever letting Vin back on the forum unless ordered to do by a 'higher authority'. Vin is suspended for breaking less rules and being less offensive than LBirdThere is a reason and an explanation for this  somewhere. But I believe that I will be joining my partner in suspension before it is allowed to come to light.

[lindanesocialist]

I think this and similar posts should include  a list of excluded members, in order to avoid embarassment of refusal. 

[lindanesocialist]

jondwhite wrote:

The topic is supposed to be about why are the Labour Party in Britain relatively large. This can include comparisons to the SPGB but not irrelevant stuff or claims that there is no difference, ideologically or otherwise.

This flaunting of the rules is repeated throughout the forum, rules persistently ignored by the many.A member is permanently suspended from this forum for breaking the same rules (allegedly)  and these very same, self righteous hypocrites that are breaking the rules now – including  Moderators –   will say and indeed DO say  'well you shouldn't break the rules' , 'Go ask the EC for forgiveness' ad nauseam.Repeat after me "Vin is suspended for breaking the rules" Say it long enough and you begin to believe it 

[lindanesocialist]

Are there any members of the SPGB excluded from applying for this post for reasons other than lack of technical ability? 

[Author]

Posts