lindanesocialist

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 504 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: I Daniel Blake by Ken Loach #122807
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Of course Daniel Blake does not live in a vacuum. He and the rest of us are engaged in a class struggle. Here is a list of his class enemies. 

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118694
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

     May I deal with the EC's criticism of the video: “The EC recognizes the efforts behind the video but is unwilling that it be adopted as an official party publication. Criticism of the video include its generally unprofessional and clichéd presentation such as that it is ineffective in getting the socialist case across. For example among other things the use of overly “dramatic” music, the appearance of cartoon capitalists, the emphasis on individual rather than a class approach.” Not to mention the demonisation of individual capitalists    

    in reply to: 100% reserve banking #86945
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
    If we get his name we can challenge him to debate and publically expose the bollox he's talking.

    Good idea, Perhaps we could also have a  debate publicly exposing  the bollox about  'free sex in socialism' : No pun intended. And if they are successful,  we could move on to a public debate with LBird exposing the bollox about   'science for communists'.Should get the working class queuing up at the door.  Only joking by the way, no offence meant.  Just saying. 

    in reply to: Report of the proceedings of 2016 ADM #122695
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    No doubt the November  EC will be considering the ADM floor resolution re the 'indefinite' suspension of a party member. It seems the Internet Committee has took no heed of the wishes of Branch delegates expressed at the Party's 2016 Annual Delegate Meeting.It is not  the EC nor the Party  that has the member suspended but the three forum moderators: and they will continue  'until ordered to do otherwise by a higher authority' Members and visitors to the forum may come to their own conclusions, but it is clear the Internet Committee has no intention of burying the hatchet and moving on and ending this  animosity.

    in reply to: 100% reserve banking #86942
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    DJP wrote:
     I suggest you read this thread from the beginning or search the site for "fractional reserve"

     No Thanks  

    in reply to: 100% reserve banking #86941
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
    Have to agree with DJP that the speaker, whoever he is, is talking a load of bollox, especially when he claims that banks can lend what they haven't got. To record and expose such nonsense is the reason for this thread.

    'load of bollox' lol.  Well that blows his argument out of the water. Your comments are usually a little more sophisticated  But you must think  his comments are interesting  or relevant otherwise you  would not have a full thread on the subject.Personally I think the whole thread is a load of bollox, there are better issues we could be discussiing. I regret posting it now   

    in reply to: 100% reserve banking #86935
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    DJP wrote:
    lindanesocialist wrote:

    That guy is a UKIP MEP, a currency crank and probable anti-semite too. These people are not our friends!

    Three personal insults  does not really counter his argument, tho, does it? This is the way our own position is criticised. Is it not more constructive to deal with  the substantive content of what he is saying rather than simply sticking labels on him?  

    in reply to: 100% reserve banking #86933
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    in reply to: Richmond by-election #122784
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
     (£500 for the election deposit and another £500 or so for leaflets for the post office to distribute free to every household). 

    Is this possible? Pay to have a manefesto delivered even tho' we are not standing?  Money well spent! 

    in reply to: Richmond by-election #122782
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Perhaps the money that would otherwise be "wasted" on the election could be used for newspaper adverts, leaflet drops, letters to the editor etc around the time of the election.Perhaps we could put a video together and promote it around election time. Online debates etc

    in reply to: socialist board games #122678
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    in reply to: I Daniel Blake by Ken Loach #122800
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    Young Master Smeet wrote:
    The big question I have is: since when have Geordies qualified for human rights?

     Am  a Mackem so I wadent knaw. We dinit think Geordies should   have a football team nivver mind  human rites.   

    in reply to: Left Unity.org / People’s Assembly #93542
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    Tim Kilgallon wrote:
    A little tip I used when I moderated on a site:If I was wearing my Darth Vada outfit, then I knew I was a moderatorIf I was wearing my Princess Leia costume then I knew I was plain old ordinary meIf I was wearing my spiderman pyjamas then I knew it was bedtime.Try it, it worked for me.

    That solves the riddle of why you sometimes came to Branch meetings with the Darth Vada outfit, had us  baffled for years. 

    in reply to: Richmond by-election #122777
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
     We won't be contesting of course (since the party's stopped standing in by elections after being beaten by Mr Blobby) 

      LOL   

    in reply to: Cooking the Books: Beyond Economics #122796
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
    Alan will never get beyond this:

    Quote:
    Pij = Ajλa Eijλe / ∑j>=1jλaEijλe

    He wouldn't be alone. 

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 504 total)