[lindanesocialist]

By the way, this guy who can/t work harmoniously with others has played in the same rock band with the same people for 20 years. Where is the evidence to the contrary?  

[lindanesocialist]

Verging on the 'disruptive' there Tim. I think DJP has banned Vin for life for less than 'cheeryarse'

[lindanesocialist]

alanjjohnstone wrote:

 However, it is disrespectful to other forum contributors to purposefully derail and detract from a thread with extraneous comments to the topic. The role of a moderator is to remind members of the forum of that and to take action when his warnings are ignored.

It is not the role of a moderator to misrepresent and lie about another member of the party. THAT IS DISRESPECTFUL

[lindanesocialist]

moderator1 wrote:

 The NERB member took umbridge at this information and responded with an insult which resulted in an indefenite suspension.

 prove it. As he is not here to defend himself becausr YOU suspended him, WHAT insult???? Withdraw you accusation

[lindanesocialist]

A h I see, just following orders.  Can't argue with that. Rules ar rules. They are there for our own good.Even if it means censorship. Not something I wish to be part of, thankshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_orders    

[lindanesocialist]

Hello mod. Why cant all comments and opinions be out and open to scrutiny for all to see? Open democracy. Why not?Where is your right to censor opinions?   I have worked for many community organisations ', welfare rights, unions and age UK and they take in all opinions without censorship.

[lindanesocialist]

Tim Kilgallon wrote:

 and am aware that Mods are implementing the rules as they exist 

 but they have not and when it is pointed out they silence and  censor those who point it out What we need to look at – motives?

[lindanesocialist]

Mod rules that result in the permanent suspension of a party member for going 'off topic' is absolute rubbish. Or as Dickens wrote:"If the law supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically in both hands, "the law is a ass – a idiot".

[lindanesocialist]

moderator1 wrote:

Vin wrote:

So I am warned 3 times for nothing but YMS can be insulting and denegratining and mod does nothing. Well , I can tack the shite so why cant others. if only Mod could understand plain English.  NB Nothing I have said in this post is any different from what anyone else has said to me – I am defending mysself -NO? But I will be referred to as abusive. Well Hock dickedi shit. And 'hell' and 'jesus' 'christ' and all those other words that upset the revolutionary socialist on this site   

Suspension:7. You are free to express your views candidly and forcefully provided you remain civil. Do not use the forums to send abuse, threats, personal insults or attacks, or purposely inflammatory remarks (trolling). Do not respond to such messages.14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules. 15. Queries or appeals relating to particular moderation decisions should be sent directly to the moderators by private message. Do not post such messages to the forum. You must continue to abide by the moderators’ decisions pending the outcome of your appeal. Despite have a 3rd and final warning, plus a PM from myself this user has continued to breach the rules. This user is suspended for an indefinite period.

   I am finding it difficult to believe that there is any justification for one member censoring and silencing another member. Especially in the light of the fact that the two members are involved in a dispute on moderation expressed in a motion in the NERB branch. This censorship prevents cde Maratty from speaking on his resolution and embarasses and brings the party into disrepute.He was clearly remove for criticising and exposing the internet committee. Well you can run but you can't hide

[Author]

Posts