lindanesocialist
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
SocialistPunk wrote:Tim Kilgallon wrote:I am aware that you have probably not seen that report, it has taken our branch a while to get hold of it.YFSTim
Tim,You seem to suggest that some kind of delay was taking place, yet when Steve contacted HO a paper copy was sent to him in reasonable time.
Vin (subject of the report and branch secretary) requested a copy from the IC on 16th April and was refused. A digital copy could easily have been sent vi email.
There is also an email to the the Internet Committee from NERB informing them of the twitter account @world_Socialism. So why they should say this to the EC remains a mystery https://www.dropbox.com/s/sz33v8qb8oj8e0k/Emailto%20IC3rdFeb%20Tw.png?dl=0
Matt wrote:It is on the record if you trawl through the Forum. There was never a problem with the 'branch' having a designated twitter feed.We have it on record that the account @worldsocialism was refused. and is still refused and underused unlike the one later opened by Vin and later challenge by the IC https://twitter.com/World_SocialismIs there any hope that this will be left to propagate socialist ideas?
Matt wrote:Nonsense. The individual deliberately set out to fall foul of guidelines everyone else respects.The individual had no concern for others, in his branch, or on the forum, or in the party.A branch member remonstrated with him prior to the event of suspension on this forum.To the effect ."Are you really going to set out to be suspended".EC decisions are accountable to the members via the branches.Matt wrote:Nonsense. The individual deliberately set out to fall foul of guidelines everyone else respects.The individual had no concern for others, in his branch, or on the forum, or in the party.A branch member remonstrated with him prior to the event of suspension on this forum.To the effect ."Are you really going to set out to be suspended".EC decisions are accountable to the members via the branches.This is insendiary. You have accused a comrade and I suggest you withdraw your abuse of a hardworking volunteer.You know what the sad thing about all this is? Vin wanted to run a twitter account, make videos and use the forums to promote them.If he had been allowed to do that there would be no problem. back off
Matt wrote:No one has 'positions of power' in the party, as there are none.The evidence of the use of power is there.Internet Committee prevented branch and individual on line activityExecutive Committee ignored branch nominations to appoint their own members on those committees.
As far as paranoia is concerned, you may alter your opinion if you were warned and expelled for petty misdemeaners that everyone is guilty of.
Ozymandias wrote:Clearly the "forum" is contributing to the ongoing death of the SPGB. In fact if anything the forum is hastening the demise…If the forum is contributing to the death of the SPGB that merely proves the case against it.
Wonder where the virus went attributed to my account? Seemed to disappear when NERB decided not discuss the charges against the Internet Committee. fortuitous
I am breaking forum rules here:True but I need to fight more than the ban on the forums, the ICis making policy and preventing activies etc. Misleading the EC to close twitter accounts etc et etc. I will leave my house to attend face to face meetings voluntarily and not at the dictates of the same people who are controlling my online activitiesedit Tho will try tto do both.
Vin has asked me to post"Apologies comrades but I do not have the time to do the EU Video as the IC is continuing with my suspension which is time consuming and is a matter I have to deal with, as I cannot attend branch meetings."
"The capitalist class – national and international – being in possession of the wealth stolen from the workers," exploitation is not theft. It is legal. Theft presuposes property. Vin
