lindanesocialist

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 504 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should Moderators take part in debates? #121065
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Who are the three moderators. Are they on the IC and do they agree with the  Vin's  (SPGB member) permament ban from party forums, lists ? 

    in reply to: Socialists Are Scarcity Deniers! #121180
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118489
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Vin saidWell I asked on our Youtube site  here   https://www.youtube.com/user/TheSPGB1904/discussion  

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118487
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Vin said:I requested some time ago that this video     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKdMi39yr8Qbe uploaded to the party's video site.   here :  https://www.youtube.com/user/TheSPGB1904/videosIs there a problem? or explanation? I have received no reply YFS 

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118484
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    gnome wrote:
    Although the minutes of the August EC meeting have yet to be published, I'm reliably informed that the following motion was passed with just one dissenter:

    Quote:
    That all members be reminded that in accordance with Rule 17, any publications except leaflets and hand bills are to be authorised by the EC prior to publication (including on public websites such as YouTube) and be requested not to publish in advance of such authorisation any items which may be reasonably construed as published by SPGB.

     

    Vin wrote:If that is the case then the following outlets contavene rule 17 and I wrote to the EC for clarification but it was not dealt with. Can the EC confirm that the following videos and twitter accounts have been authurised as per rule 17 ? As they "all  may be reasonably construed as published by SPGB."  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFZgYrHuoQfjE0JBkd_h57ghttps://twitter.com/officialSPGBhttps://twitter.com/worldsocialismhttps://twitter.com/4SocialismNowhttps://twitter.com/imposs1916https://www.facebook.com/socialistpartyofgreatbritain/?fref=tshttps://www.facebook.com/groups/worldsocialism/ And there are many many more.   

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118480
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Vin wrote:Should this video be promoted on Youtube, Facebook etc ? It may not be professional but it gives a lot of information about the party and is our only introductory video  out there.   It answers important questions: Who are you? How are you different from other  'socialist' Parties? .   Aren't humans too greedy for it to work? How can I contact you? Who is your leader? I am trying my best to promote the video as I know other comrades are.As a direct consequence of the EC's decision not to adopt – albiet by a slender majority – the video will receive no finance for promotion. I have to wonder what our absent comrades  who left inheretance for propaganda would think of this situation?YFS

    in reply to: Kent & Sussex Branch Street Stalls #88613
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118478
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Vin said: thanks for that Alan. I have tweeted this to the program and will send it via other routes  "Re your program #mackems http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p044fqv6 … Perhaps #corbyn would understand this #socialist message in #mackem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKdMi39yr8Q    "    

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118476
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

     Vin said:I posted Spencer's video on spopen last year as an example of what the party should be doing.https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/spintcom/conversations/messages/16794 Perhaps a party video committee would be a good start. It could come up with a script similar to Spencer's. Some experimentation[/quote]

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118475
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

     Vin said: Fantastic video. This is what the party needs. 20 million views   Imagine such a video going out in the name of the party  mentioning the SPGB!!  I watched this some time ago and spoke to Spencer about him helping the party produce a similar video for payment but he politely declined He explained he only did personal videos and didn't do it for money.We need a video introducing the Party and this is a great style and example.

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118472
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    Sympo wrote:
     I was slightly put off with the caricatures and drawings of people, like the one portraying David Cameron. I would prefer actual pictures of Cameron and other pro-capitalist politicians or capitalists.This might sound silly but I found the picture at 1:55 to be a little inappropriate. An actual picture of some capitalists would be better. The same goes with that cartoon at 1:04.After one minute of the video drums start playing. Is this a part of the song playing or is it a combination of two songs? Either way it sounded a little weird to me.The music is a little wimpy and sad in my opinion. Perhaps no music at all would be better?The sound of the alarm clock is unnecessary and loud.Again, no offence to anybody.

     Sympo, Vin has asked me to post this.Hi Sympo,I very much appreciate your constuctive criticisms and I am not offended in the least. It fact it is what I need as I am producing the video on my own. I dont like the caricatures myself; I used them because of fear of copyright or complaint.  I just somehow thought I needed permision. Perhaps I could have some legal advice? I notice they are used in newspapers and the Socialist Standard. But that is something that I can change.I can also improve my diction, or use an alternative speaker,  just needed someone to advise me and thanks for that. Much appreciated.The drums  are not part  of the song, they are war drums, symbolic of the class war that is raging, so I am surprised you find them 'wimpy' As a musician I noticed they were out of sync with the music (BPM) I intended to correct it when I found the relevant buttons to press in Vegas Pro software. That is probably why you find them 'weird'I deliberately made the alarm clock irritating and again sympolic of how workers cannot ignore the economic imprative of wage slavery.The party has no introductory video and a 'professional' production would cost thousands. With a little support and constructive criticism, I am capable of producing one for nothing as I, like the rest of us in this party,  wish to end capitalism.All the bestvinAgain thanks for your contribution. 

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118451
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    Ozymandias wrote:
     The commentary might be easy for you and I to understand but surely this is a global message and the guy narrating is going to cause people to switch off abroad. 

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKdMi39yr8Q

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118442
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    Aye OK 

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118440
    lindanesocialist
    Participant

    I am not sure how Kent  branch meeting keeps being  'bumped' above other posts? Is this done by mod or another user?

    in reply to: Party Video 2016 #118439
    lindanesocialist
    Participant
    lindanesocialist wrote:
     The EC moved to disassociate itself on behalf of the Party from the clips off YouTube and elsewhere produced and published by you for reasons of lack of prior consultation with the EC and unauthorised use of Party emblems. I have to let you know that in light of the above the EC rescinds your appointment to the Audio-Visual Committee" 

    Vin has asked me to say "Democratic Centralism at its best, as is my continued censorship by a central committee" 

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 504 total)