[lindanesocialist]

northern light wrote:

I'm curious as to the purpose of this post !  Is it to encourage the Mods. into providing written support for Vin's statement of intent to the E.C. ?

 According to the post #142 dated 10th March 2016 on the Forum thread – "twitter account @worldsocialism.org", the Forum moderators issued the suspension. Cde Stephen Davison, aka SocialistPunk, posted a link to this post from post #125 on the Forum thread – "Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty's indefinite forum ban".   If you have any evidence that the EC, not the Forum moderators, issued the ban, then could you please let me know.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Thanks. YFS, Oliver acting general secretary

[lindanesocialist]

gnome wrote:

On each and every occasion I experimented with this feature I was singularly unimpressed with the outcome and thus had my predilection confirmed.

As was I, comrade

[lindanesocialist]

Its George Orwell and off topic

[lindanesocialist]

Whimsical and humorous, satire and  a love for Orwell and freedom of speech.all the best Joe PS it is under off topic and jokesbut one can wonder what 1984 would have made of the need to beg for free speech  

[lindanesocialist]

gnome wrote:

Here's a possible contender as an introduction to the party made and uploaded by the newly appointed member to the Audio/Visual Committee.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFBXghoiRwU

new URL  address: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HemZYkiXz4

[lindanesocialist]

Send them to me I know someone who would be more than happy to make them accessible.According to its secretary, West London Branch will be considering a members' proposal to make short videos and an  'impressive' video at next Tuesdays meeting.  

[lindanesocialist]

As you know comrades, Vin can no longer make a contribution on this issue.

[lindanesocialist]

moderator1 wrote:

May I take this opportunity to remind users that the present situation has been unusually prolonged due to Vin failing to appeal to the EC since May of this year.  

 To be fair comrade, this EC would not have reinstated Vin    

[lindanesocialist]

moderator1 wrote:

By allowing this practice to continue the moderators were faced with the possibility of being confronted with an even bigger dilemma.  Namely, what action could we apply under the old Rule 8. which was appropriate and acceptable if the "Vin said" messages contained a further breach of the rules?

I would have thought that I (the account holder) would be responsible if the 'Vin said' comments broke the rules. I do'nt think they did before the mods changed the rules. Now of course it is against the rules.So there will be no more 'Vin saids'. Not from me anyway

[lindanesocialist]

ALB wrote:

There is in fact a Conference Resolution, from 2013, on the sort of videos needed:

Quote:

That the EC acknowledge the need for Party writers to produce 10-minute scripts on specific subjects for use at public meetings and on video.

i.e. 10 minute videos not block busters like Capitalism and Kids Stuff.

As Vin  suggests here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roJc5Ytu8LY   ?By the way the negative images are used just to show how video can be added. Better quailty can be achieved with a better green screen and studio lightingAnd this one is just over 8 minutes  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HemZYkiXz4

[lindanesocialist]

ALB wrote:

Good point, Vinda. 

 LOL   

[lindanesocialist]

mcolome1 wrote:

Maybe we can join the Hippie movement

They weren't that bad comrade 

[lindanesocialist]

mcolome1 wrote:

A society based on social production is what is going to bring real cohesion among human beings, it is going to be a natural relationship ( the unification of human beings with nature )  among all human beings around the world

 

[lindanesocialist]

moderator1 wrote:

lindanesocialist wrote:

moderator1 wrote:

 without prior permission from the moderators.”

 May I ask via what channels would permission be requested  and on what grounds would permission be granted/decided upon? How long will it take to come to such a decision?

Seeing you are currently in correspondence with the moderators via PM's on this very subject it appears this question is unnecessary.

Well I  (or we) appreciate the openess of the SPGB and wish to maintain such openess. 

[lindanesocialist]

moderator1 wrote:

 without prior permission from the moderators.”

 May I ask via what channels would permission be requested  and on what grounds would permission be granted/decided upon? How long will it take to come to such a decision?

[Author]

Posts