lindanesocialist
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
lindanesocialistParticipantYoung Master Smeet wrote:gnome wrote:the consequences of copyright infringement have been grossly exaggerated.
No, the risk of getting caught is low, but the potential harm is high, especially if maliciously enforced: the remedy is simple, as there is plenty of public domain or creative commons material available: and being able to demonstrate a generally diligent response to issues of IP and copyright makes it easier to defend claims when we do slip up. It's not rocket science.
And good practice. Perhaps a word with the party's official Youtube site wouldn't go amiss
lindanesocialistParticipantNo thanks. I have only one warning leftbut just look around the forum, it is all there staring us in the face.
lindanesocialistParticipantI would have thought the answer to our lack of growth was obvious.
September 19, 2016 at 2:02 pm in reply to: Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty’s indefinite forum ban #121407lindanesocialistParticipantmoderator1 wrote:So any appeal by Vin goes to the EC.And so it has. I was just keeping you up to date on what was happening with it
September 19, 2016 at 1:58 pm in reply to: Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty’s indefinite forum ban #121406lindanesocialistParticipantmoderator2 wrote:Has Moderator 2 now made his attitude crystal clear for all to understand, even if they don't agree with it.Yes you have, for all posterity.
lindanesocialistParticipantThere's BBC recordings, also Cde's Slapper and Montague
lindanesocialistParticipantgnome wrote:Let's not beat around the bush. This was a blatant example of prejudice based on a member's past transgressions.There's a lot of that about! So I'm glad you said it and not me
September 19, 2016 at 1:29 am in reply to: Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty’s indefinite forum ban #121403lindanesocialistParticipantWith this evidence from the general secretary, Oliver Bond, would the Mods reinstate COMRADE Vin Maratty's account. Unless the mods have an EC resolution, a conference decision or a party poll instructing otherwise
September 19, 2016 at 1:24 am in reply to: Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty’s indefinite forum ban #121402lindanesocialistParticipantSocialist Party of GB via yahoo.com 23:52 (2 hours ago) to me Hi Vin, I am a bit confused about the first paragraph. I am not aware that the EC passed a resolution suspending you from the online Forum. According to the post #142 dated 10th March 2016 on the Forum thread – "twitter account @worldsocialism.org", the Forum moderators issued the suspension. Cde Stephen Davison, aka SocialistPunk, posted a link to this post from post #125 on the Forum thread – "Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty's indefinite forum ban". If you have any evidence that the EC, not the Forum moderators, issued the ban, then could you please let me know. Thanks. YFS, Oliver
September 19, 2016 at 1:20 am in reply to: Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty’s indefinite forum ban #121401lindanesocialistParticipantmoderator1 wrote:lindanesocialist wrote:So has the EC suspended Vin or not? CDE Bond says it is down to the mods NOT the ECCan you please clarify?I've already clarified this query. I have no intention of going down old roads when you are fully aware of the answer.
so is cde Bond a liar? he says the EC has not banned VIN
September 19, 2016 at 1:12 am in reply to: Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty’s indefinite forum ban #121399lindanesocialistParticipantSo has the EC suspended Vin or not? CDE Bond says it is down to the mods NOT the ECCan you please clarify?
lindanesocialistParticipantalanjjohnstone wrote:#249,Brian posted that on our blog with a couple of graphics http://socialismoryourmoneyback.blogspot.com/2016/09/why-do-people-hate-their-work.html#252If it is downloaded on your computer and the right format, perhaps the blog can use the videos. Not sure of the technicalities, so no promisesThey would of course require EC approval
lindanesocialistParticipantSocialistPunk wrote:Weird how two forum users who don't like the forum rules, but still choose to post, have used the report feature of this forum for, "experimentation" purposes only. I guess it must be scientific socialism at work?and why is that important? There are loads of things we could be doing. I havent noticed 'reprort' being used. can you show me?and who would those two forum users be. Why not name them?
September 19, 2016 at 12:11 am in reply to: Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty’s indefinite forum ban #121397lindanesocialistParticipantmoderator1 wrote:I have no idea where such a silly sugestion originated from.Nor does the Gen Sec or the EC. Do you have any idea?
September 19, 2016 at 12:03 am in reply to: Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty’s indefinite forum ban #121395lindanesocialistParticipantmoderator2 wrote:The indefinite suspension stays in place until further notice from the EC for it to be rescinded. We advise he follows the appropriate procedure and makes a formal appeal to the EC for the ban to be rescinded. Cde V Maratty should take the initiative himself of seeking redress from the EC and present his case so to ensure it contains a sincere contrition for past conductAgreed by Moderator 1 (Cde. Johnson), Moderator 2 (Cde. Johnstone) and Moderator 3 (Cde. Davison)Vin has attempted to seek EC redress from the EC and has received this reply from the acting general secretary From Oliver Bond Hi Vin, I am a bit confused about the first paragraph. . I am not aware that the EC passed a resolution suspending you from the online Forum. According to the post #142 dated 10th March 2016 on the Forum thread – "twitter account @worldsocialism.org", the Forum moderators issued the suspension. Cde Stephen Davison, aka SocialistPunk, posted a link to this post from post #125 on the Forum thread – "Moderators decision on Cde. Maratty's indefinite forum ban". If you have any evidence that the EC, not the Forum moderators, issued the ban, then could you please let me know. Thanks. YFS, Oliver I would appreciate a comment and advice from the Mods on the General Secretary
-
AuthorPosts