KAZ

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #248281
    KAZ
    Participant

    is that really generally true? certainly the history of every country will involve bloodshed. but the only country whose foundation is intimately associated with ethnic cleansing and genocide is, surprisingly enough, jizzrael’s number one fan.

    in reply to: Labour Party facing bankruptcy #248260
    KAZ
    Participant

    As I was in Waterstones yesterday I had a look inside the book by Rachel Reeves, the would-be future Chancellor of the Exchequer, on “The Women who Made Modern Economics”. I see it has a chapter on Rosa Luxemburg. Which would mean that if she actually read anything by her (which is by no means certain since she has been exposed as a common plagiarist) she might have some acquaintance with Marxian economics.

    She ends the chapter by saying that she is a Fabian rather than a Marxist. But even that’s not true as the Fabians stood for state capitalism (run by them) while she stands just for the predominantly private enterprise capitalism that we know today — and is under the illusion that it can be made to serve the interests of the majority class of wage and salary earners. She is in for a shock.

    isn’t it bizarre how these place(wo)men write(ish) books? i just can’t imagine anyone buying this one. weirdly enough, people did seem to buy blowjob’s book about churchill. naturally, i didn’t read it but i glanced at it. the most godawful trash.

    in reply to: Women and children #248246
    KAZ
    Participant

    i dinnae think it’s a femmo thing. i think it’s pointing out that men might be combatants whereas women and children are very unlikely to be. of course, it might be that hamas has a battalion of death. bit difficult fighting wearing a horse blanket and blinkers though innit. in contrast, the idf is a fully integrated fighting force whose lasses are just as happy to kill and eat puppies and kittens as their male counterparts. as a feminist i definitely fink you should support genderneutral jizzrael. (as an aside, my ex-, who will probably be reapplying for membership sooner or later, secretly supported the afghan war for those sort of treasons).

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #248195
    KAZ
    Participant

    Just to let you know that Party members and sympathisers plan to distribute the famous leaflet at the demonstration planned for Saturday 11 November. It’s from Hyde Park to the new US embassy the other side of the river in Vauxhall.

    Leaflets can be collected from 10.30 onwards from our premises at 52 Clapham High street, SW4 7UN (2 tube stops from Vauxhall).

    Further details later under “World Socialist Movement”.

    https://palestinecampaign.org/events/national-march-for-palestine-ceasefire-now-november-11/

    vauxhall? ain’t that where the spies is? is this some sort of redoubt in the making? the new hitler’s bunker. anyway, good luck with the leafleting.

    in reply to: We should correct the party statement on our website #248175
    KAZ
    Participant

    no (i likes a nice rhetorical statement that really didn’t call for an answer, especially not from a schmoo like me). the attraction of the spugub is its universal and timeless appeal. it’s not supposed to issue statements every time a warlord or plutocrat takes a dump on the workers. bloody hell! you’d be at it all the bleeding time. that’s every trots calling in life innit.

    anyway. why do you let these embittered exs on your blatherskittery thing anyhow? first thing the aycog does is chuck em off. “why aincho achieved socialism after 119 years, four months and 29 days?” “fark off mate, you have a go.”

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #248048
    KAZ
    Participant

    i tried to use the quote function but the system blocked me. i’m never sure if there’s a malicious member hanging about (traitor! traitor! let’s nail his balls to the wall) or whether it’s just poor quality programming.

    anyway, got no beef wiv the spugub gaza statement. corblimey. luvaduck.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #248047
    KAZ
    Participant

    ZJW: the ACN is a split from the ACG of some of its most active members. ostensibly on the perennial transgender issue (we weren’t nice enough). but really because those who left have different ideas on how to organise. in my opinion there is no ideological difference.

    whee doggy! how you like them apples buddy! yeehaa! (is manky (mock yank talk) any better?)

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #248013
    KAZ
    Participant

    come here looking for the spgb gaza piece. damned if i can find it. wanna pick holes. wanna be smart arse.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #248011
    KAZ
    Participant

    iran-linked sites. it’s still a proxy war. just like in ukraine. the septics are off their noodles on blood and guts but they still have the sense not to engage where they’re going to lose (which is pretty much everywhere).

    in reply to: Dorking – No War But the Class War #245349
    KAZ
    Participant

    by the way, i probably ought to mention that the ACG-CWO alliance wasn’t particularly successful. they did an “intervention” (disrupted a meeting) and tried to poach one of our boys. good job they didn’t try me. i’m anyones for a big sloppy cream slider. however, i feel they may have anticipated that and hidden away the comestibles.

    in reply to: Dorking – No War But the Class War #245348
    KAZ
    Participant

    would that come by shemail or is there something on here? t’is a terrible format this here. always going to admins who are invariably sleeping. costs a bleeding packet too. acg one’s free. you can “like” a post or a comment just like on facebook. and it’s got built in messaging. i’m on faecesbook as keith scholey so you can contact me there. i’m the one with hedgehogs.

    in reply to: Dorking – No War But the Class War #245335
    KAZ
    Participant

    aye, that i be. your monicker seems vaguely familiar. hello chuckaluck if i knows you (not landlord wiggers shurely?).

    anyway. for myself, i’d say socialist consciousness is formed both before and during the revolution. that’s the nature of consciousness. if it’s not formed in the course of experience (struggle as the schmoos say), it’s false consciousness (or summat like).

    insurrectionalism is very old hat. pretty much a liberal thing these days. find me a wolfie smith and i’ll find you a bod who salivates over rights and identities and all that gas.

    will there be a barney? oh i should think so. them buggers won’t surrender without a fight. should we do weapons training right now in preparation for the glorious battle of tooting bec? pull the other one.

    the difference between marxists and anarchists (put the classic in front because everyone’s a wanker now) is not whether we can duke it out with the pigs but whether the pigs (and the grunts and the smarmy suits and the grubby bollock boxes and all the other crap of the modern state) are a suitable means for transforming society.

    in reply to: the bread book #228676
    KAZ
    Participant

    not one we use but one needs to cater to the children and their foibles. dear little things.

    in reply to: Glasgow Anarchist Bookfair 7/5 #228622
    KAZ
    Participant

    i’ll be at this one. there is a vague invite to the spgb. the comment was “better you goys than idpollers, trenchists or cafflicks.”

    in reply to: the unfortunate cover of the Dec 2021 issue #225285
    KAZ
    Participant

    zounds like someone should be appointed Head Inspector of Socialist Standard Covers. on the principle of you complains, you bleeding does it, an application has already been submitted. dragons and the wrong tang. nuh!

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 143 total)