jondwhite
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I would have thought orthodox trotskyists would have seen unorthodox trotskyists as soft non-revolutionaries. From recollection of WSWS, this seemed to be the view of SEP on Cliffite and Grantite groups etc.
Putting forward even personal views contrary to party agreed policy as if it were the agreed party policy from the platform of party meetings, or printed publications, stalls, pamphlets etc. would seem to be action detrimental.But in the context of pub talk, private e-mails, private letters, internet forum or internet comments or questions are surely to be distinguished from the above.The party case is indifferent to law, including but not limited to that we do not offer our support to upholding the laws of the land.
Some more upcomingBrighton 3 August Liverpool 3 August Leeds 4 August Glasgow 10 August Stoke 10 August Swindon 10 August Wakefield 11 August
The comment is at the bottom of this pagehttp://www.brixtonblog.com/tulse-hill-by-election-the-candidates-speak/14428
Quote:*** July 18, 2013 at 9:12 am ·So Steve Nally, Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition, believes in putting people before profit. This means he still supports profit making.And doesn’t his condoning of breaking the law invalidate his candidacy?An academic point perhaps, but aren't all unorthodox trotskyists dismissed as reformists by orthodox trotskyists?
Not as bad as I hoped, and the interviewee seemed too keen to appeal to authority (PhD, scholarly work etc.) – but at least the interviewer from Fox could have read the first few pages of the book rather than Muslim-baiting.
thanks for the report. A stall will be overkill next year if there is another Marxism Festival.there is a report of an incident via urban75, not sure if this is the same alleged assault retweeted by leninology (richard seymour)http://howiescorner.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/the-swp-wont-call-police-over-alleged.htmlthere is also a piece herehttp://bloggingjbloggs1917.wordpress.com/2013/07/13/occupy-marxism/
