imposs1904

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 790 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Abstract Propaganda in a Hollywood Movie #92140
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Just noticed via my sitemeter that there is another Brooklyn based reader on the forum. If you want to contact me offlist . . . 

    in reply to: SWP Pre-conference Bulletins 2012 #91244
    imposs1904
    Participant

    For anyone wanting to be brought up to speed on what's been happening in the SWP, Green blogger Jim Jepps has provided a nice timeline with links from all concerned:http://www.jimjepps.net/?p=273

    in reply to: SWP Pre-conference Bulletins 2012 #91236
    imposs1904
    Participant

    That's one scenario, of course, but another scenario is that the growing opposition to the SWP's CC response to all this generates enough support to trigger a recall Conference – I've read in a couple of places that they need 20% of Branches to spark such a recall Conference – and you have the much thoroughgoing challenge to the leadership from middle-ranking cadre and rank-and-file members in the SWP's history.That's never happened before. The recall Conference . . . a widespread rank-and-file revolt . . . it's all new, and therefore totally unpredicatible.

    in reply to: SWP Pre-conference Bulletins 2012 #91232
    imposs1904
    Participant

    I think this post from Richard Seymour on his popular blog, Lenin's Tomb:http://www.leninology.com/2013/01/crisis-in-swp.htmland China Mielville's quotes in Laurie Penny's New Statesman article about the events in the SWP:http://www.newstatesman.com/laurie-penny/2013/01/what-does-swps-way-dealing-sex-assault-allegations-tell-us-about-left is pretty much a game changer for the SWP. I'd be genuinely surprised if this time next year the SWP resembles the organisation it currently is, the organisation it has been for the last forty plus years. It's the most serious schism in the IS/SWP tradition since the IS Opposition split in the mid-seventies. I don't think it was this recent sad chain of events that prompted some members of the SWP to look at its democratic deficit. It took the internet. It wouldn't have happened otherwise.

    imposs1904
    Participant
    imposs1904
    Participant

    An article on Morris from the same author that appeared in an old issue of the ISJ along the same lines as the book: http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/isj2/1996/isj2-071/mahamdallie.htm

    in reply to: Bring back the pamphlet! #90672
    imposs1904
    Participant

    We should be looking to convert pamphlets – both old and new  – into epub and mobi formats and placing them on the Party website for free download.

    in reply to: Speakers Corner Project #91075
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Hopefully the 80s generation of Party members who are now either detached or semi-detached from the SPGB will be contacted about this.

    in reply to: World Socialist 1984-7 #90813
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Sterling work.There's some real gems in amongst those issues.

    in reply to: Libertarian Socialists Alan Woodward 1939-2012 #90641
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Seems strange (and a little sad) to read that Woodward sought to distort our position, 'cos I remember he was actually a guest speaker at a Central London Branch meeting in the early 2000s. (Sorry, I can't remember the exact year, though the meeting would probably have been advertised in the Standard at the time.)The invite to speak at the branch came about because a couple of us got chatting to him at the SWP's Marxism that year –  we may have had adjacent stalls outside the event –  and we were interested in his political history and political trajectory, I guess. Someone who was in the IS/SWP position for 35 plus years and then decides on his own special take on councillism is not something you encounter every day.I don't remember much about the meeting itself, except that the ICC turned up mob-handed (all 3 of them) and proceeded to denounce him in the gentlest of terms during the question and discussion period. ;-)It turns out that his pamphlets had turned up on their radar at the time, and they thought it needed the extra effort to speak out in public against him.He seemed like a nice enough bloke at the time.

    in reply to: Second Imperialist World War: book launch #89944
    imposs1904
    Participant

    How did the meeting go? Was there a recording of meeting?

    imposs1904
    Participant

    “I wouldn’t be surprised if he ends up a bishop.” I knew there was a method to my madness when I lent him my copy of Tariq Ali’s Redemption.

    in reply to: Speakers Corner (1982) #88548
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Cheers for uploading this. Fascinating stuff.

    in reply to: Speakers Corner (1982) #88543
    imposs1904
    Participant
    Ed wrote:
    is there any more of that peoples century video?  It looked like Harry Young had more to say on the subject.

     That’s the full clip of Harry Young from that programme. I know this because it was me who uploaded the clip to YouTube. ;-)Btw, as a point of interest, the consultant for that particular episode of People’s Century was Robert Service, who’s best known for his biographies of Lenin and Trotsky. I think a couple of his books have been reviewed in the Standard.

    in reply to: Speakers Corner (1982) #88539
    imposs1904
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqlXbJOpYiIFor newer members, the Party speaker is Harry Young.

     Look at the Standards they are selling in the clip. That’s later than ’82. Maybe ’86 or ’87. I left a comment to that effect on the YouTube page and the cheeky sod deleted it.

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 790 total)