DJP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 2,088 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • DJP
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
    I think that should be "workers' share of newly created" or "added value" since, by definition, "surplus value" is the part of this that precisely doen't go to the workers.

    Yup 

    DJP
    Participant
    alanjjohnstone wrote:
    On some thread i think it is stated that Kliman goes against the common belief that workers income has declined

    Well that's not quite it. He says that there wasn't a decline in workers income before the advent of the crisis and that the workers share of surplus value should be calculated including non-wage benefits such as health care etc…

    in reply to: Money Free Party #106887
    DJP
    Participant

    I don't think they should have used child labour I found the kids voice irritating and they could have cut it in half by not having the Jacques Fresco clips. I think the short format of our election video was good.

    in reply to: Knowledge #105571
    DJP
    Participant

    I read this book by Simon Blackburn earlier in the year. It's good, but more like a guide through the arguments as they have taken form through the millennia than an out and out solution to the problem…http://www.theguardian.com/books/2005/may/21/highereducation.news1

    in reply to: The Internet, Social Media and Socialism #106736
    DJP
    Participant
    Quote:
    How do people come across the WSM on reddit?

    In the past articles have been shared on there (probably by members of the public) and have got click backs in the high double figure range, maybe more…

    Quote:
    As old hat as the public meeting and leaflet drop?

    Well no, but will be before you know it. Remember Myspace? Good to try and be a bit ahead of the curve…

    in reply to: The Internet, Social Media and Socialism #106732
    DJP
    Participant

    Twitter and Facebook are old hat now. Forums even more so. We sometimes get quite a lot of success from Reddit.com now…

    in reply to: The Internet, Social Media and Socialism #106730
    DJP
    Participant
    in reply to: Erich Fromm #86306
    DJP
    Participant

    It's been years since I read that stuff but I think he saying something like emotionally damaged (what he would call armored) people will be unable to see a socialist revolution through because they are too dependent on hierarchy etc and it is only until an undamaged generation is raised that socialism would be possible. Though he did change his views as his life progressed and ended up dying thinking that his experiments had summoned UFOs from space…

    in reply to: Erich Fromm #86305
    DJP
    Participant

    I really don't think there's anything in Reich's orgone theories (though I used to when I was a excitable teenager and not so good at critical thought) which is a shame since they obscure what useful stuff he did write.I don't think he claimed people automatically become socialists through therapy either….

    in reply to: The Internet, Social Media and Socialism #106725
    DJP
    Participant
    Vin wrote:
    People have and will continue to join the party because of social media contact and discussion, DJP. Whether we like it or not people  will become more and more influenced by social media as opposed to going to a public meeting or reading a leaflet that comes through the door or a newspaper from the corner shop.

    You've misunderstood me.I mean that our approach to the internet and social media should be concerned with what will make us more visible / give us most exposure to people who may already agree with some or all of what we say rather than trying to activly get involved in the infinite amount of endless (and in my opinion low quality) "discussion" that takes place online. It's about what is the most effective use of our limited time and resources.I think the Debunking Handbook that I think I mentioned in another thread is a good source for ideas…http://www.skepticalscience.com/Debunking-Handbook-now-freely-available-download.html

    in reply to: The Internet, Social Media and Socialism #106722
    DJP
    Participant

    Perhaps this sums it up.In all honesty I think it's more about us being visible to people that might agree with us rather than trying to endlessly get involved in every online "debate" going..

    in reply to: search forum #104395
    DJP
    Participant

    This is also fixed now. Thanks for letting us know.

    in reply to: Peter Watkins “The Commune” #106715
    DJP
    Participant

    There's also that TV series with Patrick Stewary as Lenin, sure I started watching it online once but can't seem to find it again…

    in reply to: Peter Watkins “The Commune” #106711
    DJP
    Participant

    The Rosa Luxemburg film is on youtube tohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiR0MmxB2qU

    in reply to: Marxist Animalism #106250
    DJP
    Participant

    From one of the articles mentioned above.

    Quote:
    The author of Animal Farm, George Orwell, commenting on the genesis of this work, stated: “Men exploit animals in much the same way as the rich exploit the proletariat”

    I don't think that's right, we don't enter into social relations with animals, but then that does not mean that we should not have ethical concerns about them. It's just that these concerns can only arise from a singular direction only, from us. In much the same way that we have relations with future generations etc…

Viewing 15 posts - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 2,088 total)