DJP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 2,084 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General election #252901
    DJP
    Participant

    I’m not an apologist, I’m a sympathiser. I feel very sorry for them. (Weak attempt at humour I know).

    in reply to: General election #252898
    DJP
    Participant

    So it’s not wishful thinking or fantasy to think that some fringe candidate in a UK election will have a meaningful sway on Israeli military policy? Another interesting take.

    in reply to: Labour Party facing bankruptcy #252877
    DJP
    Participant

    “No words.”

    Meme warfare

    in reply to: Cost of living crisis #252871
    DJP
    Participant

    I was asking more about how you thought this is connected to your more general claims about the impossibility of achieving socialism and the futility of even trying. The fact that the price of gas has temporarily fallen doesn’t seem to be here or there.

    in reply to: Cost of living crisis #252860
    DJP
    Participant

    So what!?

    I’m still puzzled at what you think the relevance of this is to anything?

    in reply to: More people choosing a blindfold. #252719
    DJP
    Participant

    But if what you’ve said is a universal truth how would *any* change ever be possible?

    in reply to: More people choosing a blindfold. #252717
    DJP
    Participant

    I was just merely trying to provide some evidence for my anecdotal assertion. And I wasn’t just talking about academic conferences for other academics. I’ve been to the grand total of one of them in my whole life. But doesn’t seem much point labouring over it here.

    in reply to: More people choosing a blindfold. #252714
    DJP
    Participant

    Communism, properly understood, isn’t an obscure idea at all. It’s widely known, internationally and especially in political theory circles. I meet and talk with people from all over Europe and wider that know about it. The SPGB didn’t invent communism – as we all know.

    The SPGB, unfortunately doesn’t get a wide reach with its publicity. It could ands should do much better at using digital media. But that’s another back-seat driver comment from me. Make of it what you will.

    in reply to: More people choosing a blindfold. #252708
    DJP
    Participant

    TBH I don’t think SPGB vote shares are a very good metric of anything and, given the current climate, am also unsure of the publicity value of standing in elections. But that’s just my back-seat driver opinion.

    Most people that understand socialism in the non-market sense will not have learnt it from the SPGB and most likely never even heard of it.

    But there’s nothing in this which means that a mass socialist movement is a logical or psychological impossibility, just an indication of the long and lonely road to get there. Which we all knew already.

    in reply to: More people choosing a blindfold. #252701
    DJP
    Participant

    It must be a tough life being the only cultured genius in the village.

    in reply to: More people choosing a blindfold. #252699
    DJP
    Participant

    Even if they took the time to read the Leaflet the SPGB would be written off as cranks by 99% of workers. The minute they read the word “Socialism” it’s the kiss of death.

    But that’s not at all true.

    67 per cent of young Brits want a socialist economic system, finds new poll

    in reply to: More people choosing a blindfold. #252672
    DJP
    Participant

    Those changes were not the result of the conscious actions of the world’s population. How could they be? There were no means in place (videre licet, universal suffrage), to record the collective will, even in the extremely improbable likelihood one even existed.

    You’ve made a silly slip up here. Something existing is not dependent on the possibility of it being recorded or measured. Obviously you know that.

    But anyhow, a shift in the use of technology (BTW I can’t see how that can occur ‘unconsciously’, without people being aware of it), is different from a political shift in how a society organises itself. Technological determinism isn’t a useful way to understand politics.

    DJP
    Participant

    Saito’s book “Slow Down: How Degrowth Communism Can Save the Earth” was published in English in January of this year. I guess that’s why he is appearing in places such as the Intellegence Squared podcast which do a have broad listenership. Can only be a good thing that some of these ideas, such as his conception of communism, are getting a wider airing.

    https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5zb3VuZGNsb3VkLmNvbS91c2Vycy9zb3VuZGNsb3VkOnVzZXJzOjI0NjE2NjMvc291bmRzLnJzcw/episode/MTU5ZjExYzgtZjQzYy0xMWVlLTk4ZTktNWIzMWJmMjJhOGJl

    in reply to: Waiting on the vote results #252010
    DJP
    Participant

    I glad the conservatives, especially in their current BNP mode, are on the way out. But what follows from them will of course only be marginally different. Though marginal differences affect those on the margins most.

    How much better these marginal differences will be for workers we will have to see. They will be inheriting a bad situation.

    Schadenfreude is a hollow type of happiness.

    DJP
    Participant

    But hasn’t it been seen to be a threat in the Middle East, South America and Africa?

    The only way you can speak of “fascism” in these places is by using a broader definition than the one used in the quote above.

    Like I said orignally, it’s all about how you define it.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 2,084 total)