DJP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 2,084 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Boris promises a high wage economy #223286
    DJP
    Participant

    Even those manufacturing and retail capitalists who backed Brexit are turning on Johnson for blaming business for relying on low wage immigrant labour and telling them to pay their workers more instead.

    I wonder how much of a switch around we will see, with Labour becoming the “party of business”

    The financiers who funded the Brexit referendum campaign are not saying anything.

    But are they getting what they wanted?

    On the question of wages and migration I think this article by Critisticuffs is always a good one to share:
    https://critisticuffs.org/texts/immigrants-take-our-jobs

    in reply to: Hong Kong #222667
    DJP
    Participant
    in reply to: Social Credits. Vax Passports. We are fucked. #222368
    DJP
    Participant

    Everything else aside, you do know the UK government is not going to do vaccine passports after all?

    in reply to: The ‘Occupy’ movement #222299
    DJP
    Participant

    There was a lengthy article featuring interviews with founding figures of Occupy in this weekend’s FT. Worth a look.

    https://www.ft.com/content/761f5219-f35e-43e6-88a2-4634f25fd1a9

    From the article:

    Micah White left Adbusters in 2013 and declared Occupy a “constructive failure”. In his book, he argues that mass protests are no longer an effective tool for bringing about change. Speaking to me via video call, White now believes that Occupy should have made a plan to leave and come back, rather than trying to endure both New York’s winter and its police. “The occupiers were delusional,” he says. “They were just like living in a fantasy land. The encampment model doesn’t actually manifest sovereignty over the government, even if it does manifest a better form of democracy temporarily. It was a good experiment, but it was a dead end.”

    in reply to: ‘The ideological foundations of Critical Race Theory’ #221748
    DJP
    Participant

    A more accurate article about what CRT is and is not.
    https://theconversation.com/critical-race-theory-what-it-is-and-what-it-isnt-162752

    in reply to: ‘The ideological foundations of Critical Race Theory’ #221701
    DJP
    Participant

    good article.

    No, I don’t think it is. It’s just carelessly recycling right-wing tropes about the Frankfurt school (what they used to attack as “cultural Marxism). And if they make a hash of that I’m presuming they’re making a has of the rest.

    A better article on why race essentialism is no good for socialism is the recent Anarchist Communist Group pamphlet on “identity politics”, or Kwame Anthony Appiah’s book The Lies that Bind. A version of the book as a series of audio lectures is here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07z43ds

    This Youtube channel has some interesting stuff about identity and activist morality:

    in reply to: ‘The ideological foundations of Critical Race Theory’ #221589
    DJP
    Participant

    Critical Race Theory doesn’t really have much to do with Adorno and Horkheimer either, or even Habermas. I guess the name sounds similar to “Critical Theory”, but CRT is its own thing, coming from the academic field of law.

    Critical Theory isn’t “postmodernism” either, Habermas was critical of Foucault and Derrida.

    Adorno’s writings on culture and music are worth reading if you like that kind of thing, but I agree his style isn’t the easiest to read.

    in reply to: SPGB leads on Washington Post! #219302
    DJP
    Participant

    This is not the Washington Post!

    in reply to: BBC Discussion Programme Capitalism #218928
    DJP
    Participant

    Get an account on Twitter then write something, then end it with #BBCTricky

    The programme was interesting thanks for sharing

    in reply to: missing: Yehudi Webster #218767
    DJP
    Participant

    In case you don’t know, sometimes content that has disappeared from the web can be found by typing the URL into the Waybackmachine at Archive.org

    in reply to: This week’s election results #217701
    DJP
    Participant

    The Conservatives got a 23% increase this year. The UKIP / Brexit party vote has completely disappeared and probably gone to them. Quite a few factors playing in their favour I think.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartlepool_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2020s

    in reply to: This week’s election results #217694
    DJP
    Participant

    Perhaps. Though I wonder how much of a factor the ‘vaccine bounce’ is playing in all of this.

    in reply to: Amazon workers voted against union #216881
    DJP
    Participant

    A more interesting article here, mentioning non-unionised wildcats that have been happening at other Amazon facilities

    Editorial #2 -Thoughts on Bessemer

    in reply to: Holodomer denier? #216852
    DJP
    Participant

    My advice would be to avoid these kind of social media “discussions”, nobody ever changed their mind that way. It’s just timewasting rather than useful activity.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 7 months ago by DJP.
    in reply to: Digital Technology and Socialism #216324
    DJP
    Participant

    Thomas Moore may have been slightly annoying but when there’s only four people posting to a forum do we really have to worry about derailment? Not that I particularly care, this is really just a form of procrastination for me.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 2,084 total)