chelmsford

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 193 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Did the SPGB get it wrong? #250854
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Academic questions – needn’t be answered. No one knows why.

    We could generalise this question without going off thread. For example, the SPGB at one time argued that a rise in unemployment would follow from the introduction of a minimum wage. This hasn’t happened. Or has it?

    in reply to: George Galloway to vote Tory #250805
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Hamilton wants to see more homes with solar panels. Hamilton is a self-employed heating engineer specializing in the fitting of solar panels. Hmmm.

    Interesting dunghill of policies.

    in reply to: Big capitalists anticipating nuclear apocalypse #250558
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Certainly does speak for itself – there’s one born every minute.

    in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #250529
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Ghastly photograph on the front page of the Times today. Some sort of perverse victory for feminism I suppose.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #250489
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Not so long ago predicted a war between Russia and Turkey (which would have involved NATO). There isn’t going to be a Third Great War.
    Start digging that fall-out shelter.

    in reply to: King Charles cancer shock news #250330
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Well this is in bad taste isn’t it? And from a moderator too!

    A bank holiday some time during the summer would be nice.

    in reply to: Big capitalists anticipating nuclear apocalypse #250313
    chelmsford
    Participant

    And what about all the Russian capitalists who own expensive properties in London? They wont want them knocked about by Russian atom bombs. Blistered paintwork, the odd cracked window pane and what have you. Would be a bit of an own goal there.
    So if nothing else Greater London ought to be all right. Well, the swankier parts.

    in reply to: Labour Party facing bankruptcy #250300
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Given the brutal realities of capitalism, Steamer and his crew may find themselves reneging on its promises to the capitalist class. Poor things.
    Why do Labour make appeals to these people? After all, in terms of number of votes they are little more than a skid-mark on the gusset of the big knickers that is the electorate.(Delicious metaphor).

    in reply to: Big capitalists anticipating nuclear apocalypse #250257
    chelmsford
    Participant

    I can’t see Mr Biden attacking Iran. After all he is an old man who has never had any military training as far as I know, and therefore would be no match for the Iranian army. Besides a man of his age would look ridiculous tripping about like the sugar-plum fairy in military fatigues.
    I fancy his chances against Russia tho’.

    in reply to: Lenin still dead – after 100 years #250238
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Barltrop made the telling point that if it were not for the Bolshevik revolution, today Marx would be as well known as Lassalle or Duhring or Proudhon to name but three. He would be by and large unknown.

    • This reply was modified 9 months, 3 weeks ago by chelmsford.
    in reply to: Big capitalists anticipating nuclear apocalypse #250174
    chelmsford
    Participant

    My old mother was an extra in the 1960’s BBC docudrama The War Game, playing ‘dead housewife supine on the sidewalk’. Sadly, she was so badly charred it was impossible to distinguish her from the other corpses so her acting career ended there.

    in reply to: US talks about “human rights.” #250081
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Look on the bright side. At least he will be spared dying in the coming atomic unpleasantness.

    • This reply was modified 10 months ago by chelmsford.
    in reply to: Big capitalists anticipating nuclear apocalypse #249972
    chelmsford
    Participant

    I wonder if capitalism’s ideologists adhere to some theory that it is no bad thing for the working class to have the Brad Pitts put up it every now and again, as some obscure means of social control or something. If so, I would like to hear the theory plainly stated.

    in reply to: Labour Party facing bankruptcy #249832
    chelmsford
    Participant

    To be fair to Steamer, on that leaflet you could swap his name for almost any bougeois politician in the ‘democracies’ and it would still make sense. Politicians are devious and power mad – who knew?

    in reply to: Chinese Tensions #249827
    chelmsford
    Participant

    At a state dinner given for Nixon, a US diplomat asked Mao what would have happened if Khrushchev rather than Kennedy had been assassinated. Mao thought for a bit and replied: I don’t think Mr. Onassis would have married Mrs Khrushchev.
    Although indifferent to the suffering of millions of peasants thanks to his agricultural policy, Mao did have a sense of humour.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 193 total)