What is the ‘Islamic State’?
- This topic has 8 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
And of course we should read this alongside knowledge of how all 'states' were/are formed and that the French, UK and US governments were murdering and looting, instilling fear in the population and living on stolen goods from gangster-like gangs long before ISIS appeared on the scene.
Following is a discussion on the page titled: What is the 'Islamic State'?.
Below is the discussion so far. Feel free to add your own comments!I think here are significant differences to 'tradiotnal state formation', whilst primary accumulation (i.e. extraction of raw surplus) is an inherent part, most states emerge from within a wider culture, hence the formulation of 'selective inventive tradition', myth of the Norman Yolk not withstanding. This is important, because most states have some element of buy-in from the local population, and as they develop, there is the element of the state as the terms of the class truce.With regard to Empire and Colonialism, don't forget that the European empires were outgrowths of free enetrprise, i.e. that there were classes of people outside the state who did the slave trading and primary accumulation (albeit with the backing of the state).IS aren't looking for buy-in, and their membersdon't have private enterprises (AFAICS) outside that organisation. Their plundering is more akin to the Spanish Conquistadors, more direct and naked (and, thus, weaker). IS is more akin to an imposed culture (and it hasn't been round long enough to see what sway the apparent allegiance of the tribes will have).
Young Master Smeet wrote:myth of the Norman Yolk.Norman Yolk? Is that connected with the myth of Humpty Dumpty?
This might make interesting reading. Building a viable country rooted in fundamentalist theology was the central aim of ISIS. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/07/leaked-isis-document-reveals-plan-building-state-syria
Quote:“If the west sees Isis as an almost stereotypical band of psychopathic killers, we risk dramatically underestimating them…It’s not a big departure from the works of Mao, the practices of the Viet Minh in Indochina, or other movements for whom high-profile actions were really just the tip of a far more nuanced iceberg of organising activity.Quote:“Far from being an army of irrational, bloodthirsty fanatics, IS [Isis] is a deeply calculating political organisation with an extremely complex, well-planned infrastructure behind it.”YMS, I will have to agree to disagree on that one. To my knowledge there has never been a 'social contract' . States are not set up by consent, consent is later manufactured thro' violence and propaganda and lies. The idea of a contract was concocted by the boureoisie and it political philosophers to justify their theft and ownership rights.Take the US of A for example. We murdered, raped burned suppressed and stole from the indiginous population in a more horrific fashion than ISIS could even imagine. The state was established by murderous gangster style groups and the constitution, for what its worth, written by a handful of people.
I didn't say social contract, but truce. The US constitution contains the hidden hand of Shay's rebellion, the role of slaves who joined the British during the War of Independence, etc. The British state contains laws demanded by the workers movement. The US did conquer groups like the Navajo Empire, who were themselves busy expanding over other trabal groups (and remain the Native American Nation today: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_reservation).The idea of reservations shows the quasi truce like nature of legal systems, since these legal entities now shape a relationship that has underlying force. As I recall, in many instances, the state in the US lagged behind the private enterprise of the settlers (indeed, in some senses, the British intention to recognise the Native Borders and stop expandsion was a proximate cause of the War of Independence).Agency is not a one way street. A 'selective invented tradition' means appropriation and recuperation of culture by the hegemonic elite, but also implie that there is a dialogue and something like a common language.
Further evidence that ISIS is essentially a gang of marauding bandits under the guise of religion:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3360382/ISIS-extorts-millions-captive-residents-Syria-Iraq-Jihadis-uses-army-tax-collectors-fund-coalition-bombing-targets-oil-fields.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
More background info on the system of economic exploitation imposed by ISIS in the areas it controls:http://www.syriahr.com/en/2015/12/islamic-state-seizes-half-of-some-businessmens-money-in-the-countryside-of-deir-ezzor-and-it-covers-the-expenses-of-its-military-operations-from-collecting-zakat/Basically direct plundering to share out amongst its fighters, all under the guise of religion of course.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.