Theory and practice
- This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 9 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Off-topic post by Robbo moved from: temporal single system interpretation thread.
It seems LBird rejects this material analysis but doesn't have an alternative – apart from we all have a vote to value items – so resorts to obfuscation and becomes frustrated
That is hardly simplifying things for fellow workers, is it?
LOL.That is to put it mildly! But I dont think LBird has the foggiest idea just how daft what he is arguing for actually is. He is a completely lost in his own little fantasy world, bless his little cotton socks. Apart from anything else, the valuation of goods according to their socially necessary labour content is an abstraction relevant only to a society in which goods take the form of commodities. It wont be relevant in the slightest to a communist society in which commodity production has ceased to exist. End of.
YMS wrote:Ultimately, though, all lengths would never be resolvable to all measurements.LBird replied:But for any society to act, there has to be a social and historical (and thus temporary) resolution of 'length' and 'measurement'.And if this resolution is a social act, and the society doing the resolution is a democratic society (as a socialist one would be), then this necessary socio-historical resolution is amenable to a vote.The alternative is that an elite 'tells' us. We have that now.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.