The Young Karl Marx (2017)

December 2024 Forums General discussion The Young Karl Marx (2017)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #85258
    jondwhite
    Participant

    The Young Karl Marx (2017) English trailer has been released

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6orwBQiS6f0

    One comment I read was

    Quote:
    Kinda hate how they portray Engels as just a bankroller or cheerleader for Marx. Engels was a great writer himself, his work on the state and the family and how these notions have been shaped and carved out of the development of capitalism are crucial for all socialists.
    #124205
    Dave B
    Participant

    While in Manchester between October and November 1843, Engels wrote his first economic work, entitled "Outline of a Critique of Political Economy."[24]Engels sent the article to Paris, where Marx published it in the Deutsch–Französische Jahrbücherin 1844………. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Engels it wasn’t too bad really for a 23 year old in 1843 and was on a different planet compared to where Karl was at the time.  Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy by Frederick Engels We have seen that capital and labour are initially identical; we see further from the explanations of the economist himself that, in the process of production, capital, the result of labour, is immediately transformed again into the substratum, into the material of labour; and that therefore the momentarily postulated separation of capital from labour is immediately superseded by the unity of both. And yet the economist separates capital from labour, and yet clings to the division without giving any other recognition to their unity than by his definition of capital as “stored-up labour.” The split between capital and labour resulting from private property is nothing but the inner dichotomy of labour corresponding to this divided condition and arising out of it. And after this separation is accomplished, capital is divided once more into the original capital and profit – the increment of capital, which it receives in the process of production; although in practice profit is immediately lumped together with capital and set into motion with it.  https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/df-jahrbucher/outlines.htm and; https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/10/23.htm

    #124206
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    We must  be very careful with those movies or documentary on Karl Marx. There is one movie made in Argentina, and another one made in Cuba which do not represent the real point of view of Marx, on both  he is presented as a Social Democrat. I received one from Cuba, and I am going to send it for the SPGB library. Until now, none of them have subtitles

    #124207
    jondwhite
    Participant

    The first review is herehttps://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/feb/12/the-young-karl-marx-review-communist-bromance-raoul-peck

    #124208
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The Marxist-Humanist and other grouos have been dealing for years with the nonsenses of the so called Young Marx, or the so called young writting of Marx, and trying to create two different persons. Marx like any beginner he was wrong in many aspects, and he was also wrong in many aspect when he was an adult person. The impportance thing is to take the most essential ideass of Marx, even more, without Marx socialism and the Socialist Party would have existed, it would have taken a long time to understand certain principles,  The Marxist Humanist have also tried to create a different Lenin, the Lenin before 1914 and Lenin after 1914. Lenimism is Leninism

    #124209
    alanjjohnstone
    Keymaster

    Ah, the proper thread for this posthttp://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/events-and-announcements/marx-movies

    #124210
    moderator1
    Participant

     alanjjohnstoneOfflineJoined: 22/06/2011Send PM Marx at the MoviesIt's been referred to before on the forum but i can't find the thread.BBC Review From the Berlin Film Festivalhttp://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20170213-film-review-the-young-karl-marx"I have no country to fight for; my country is the Earth, and I am a citizen of the World." – Eugene V. Debs

    #124211
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Dave B wrote:
    While in Manchester between October and November 1843, Engels wrote his first economic work, entitled "Outline of a Critique of Political Economy."[24]Engels sent the article to Paris, where Marx published it in the Deutsch–Französische Jahrbücherin 1844………. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Engels it wasn’t too bad really for a 23 year old in 1843 and was on a different planet compared to where Karl was at the time.  Outlines of a Critique of Political Economy by Frederick Engels We have seen that capital and labour are initially identical; we see further from the explanations of the economist himself that, in the process of production, capital, the result of labour, is immediately transformed again into the substratum, into the material of labour; and that therefore the momentarily postulated separation of capital from labour is immediately superseded by the unity of both. And yet the economist separates capital from labour, and yet clings to the division without giving any other recognition to their unity than by his definition of capital as “stored-up labour.” The split between capital and labour resulting from private property is nothing but the inner dichotomy of labour corresponding to this divided condition and arising out of it. And after this separation is accomplished, capital is divided once more into the original capital and profit – the increment of capital, which it receives in the process of production; although in practice profit is immediately lumped together with capital and set into motion with it.  https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/df-jahrbucher/outlines.htm and; https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/10/23.htm

    Engels was the economist, then Marx studied Political Economy

    #124212
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    A movie is just that. All illusions and allusions even when informative or entertaining.

    #124213
    jondwhite
    Participant
    Matt wrote:
    A movie is just that. All illusions and allusions even when informative or entertaining.

    Is this philistinism? Would you say the same about 'Capitalism and other Kids Stuff?' or Hardy's video lectures?Another review albeit in Germanhttp://www.spiegel.de/kultur/kino/berlinale-2017-der-junge-karl-marx-i-am-not-your-negro-a-1134210.htmland elsewhere Alan posted thishttp://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20170213-film-review-the-young-karl-marx

    #124214
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I don't think so. Ours were educative, the movie is a 'bums on seat' commercial venture.I really don't take movies seriously.

    #124215
    Bijou Drains
    Participant
    Matt wrote:
    I don't think so. Ours were educative, the movie is a 'bums on seat' commercial venture.I really don't take movies seriously.

    What? not even Bambi?

    #124216
    jondwhite
    Participant
    Matt wrote:
    I don't think so. Ours were educative, the movie is a 'bums on seat' commercial venture.I really don't take movies seriously.

    From wikipedia on film festivals

    Quote:
    most [film] festivals operate on a nonprofit membership-based model, with a combination of ticket sales, membership fees, and corporate sponsorship constituting the majority of revenue. Unlike other arts nonprofits (performing arts, museums, etc.), film festivals typically receive few donations from the general public and are occasionally organized as nonprofit business associations instead of public charities
    #124217
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Very interesting but I still don't take movies seriously.

    #124218
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Matt wrote:
    Very interesting but I still don't take movies seriously.

    Me either, especially those about the life of Marx or Engels. All of them wanted to present both as left wingers

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.