Steve-san-francisco off-topic post

[moderator2]

Tim Kilgallon wrote:

 

Whilst I respect and am grateful for the role of the moderators and genuinely understand the difficulties you face trying to moderate the forum, I am also of the personal opinion that the current rules, especially those which ban the questining of moderation decisions in public are unfit for a Socialist Orrganisation, However I am happy, until new rules and guidance are developed, to go along with them as they are written. I also think that this is a principle which should be applied to all participants in the forum, including moderators

 

 

.

.

.

@Tim Kilagllon,

or Anyone interested in Debate for 5 minutes the proposition that . . .

Google docs has the rules built into it that I want in our forum. Google alows a document owner, such as Steve SanFrancisco, to specify at document creation time that the document is 100% public. Anyone can publicly warn me by posting a comment in my google doc for all to see.  Google docs is a comunistic friendly privacy rights and confidentiality policy set compared with the rules in this forum.

[moderator2]

moderator3 wrote: I tried.Reminder: Rule 1. The general topic of each forum is given by the posted forum description. Do not start a thread in a forum unless it matches the given topic, and do not derail existing threads with off-topic posts. May I remind users that there already exists a thread in the Web/Tech section of this forum, where suggestions regarding moderation can be discussed.http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/website-technical/moderation-su…  Should I go there and discuss my survey and questions and focus on time?  Anyone want me to spend 5 minutes writing on a topoic of your choice in the moderation suggestions forum?

[Author]

Posts